Abstract
As shown throughout this book, the health and care sector not only is a sector of great economic significance to municipalities, it also has great public interest and is of personal significance to many people. The amount, availability, content, and quality of the care services have an impact on the daily lives of an increasing proportion of the population, including both the users and the relatives who are involved in their lives.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Christensen K. 2005. “The Modernization of Power in Norwegian Home Care Services.” In Dilemmas of Care in the Nordic Welfare State: Continuity and Change, edited by H. M. Dahl and T. Rask Eriksen. Ashgate, 33–46.
Edvardsen, U. 2010. “The Work Situations of Home Helpers in Japan and Norway.” In Meeting the Challenges of Elder Care. Japan and Norway, edited by Y. Saito, R. Abe Auestad and K. Wærness. Kyoto Universtity Press/Trans Pacific Press, 88–103.
Edvardsen, U. 2012. Kvalitet og ressursbruk i pleie og omsorg [Quality and the Use of Resources Within the Health and Care Sector]. Audit report.
Helse og omsorgsdept. 2012–2013. Morgendagens omsorg. St. meld. nr. 29.
Helse og omsorgsdepartementet. 2005–2006. Mestring, muligheter og mening. Framtidas omsorgsutfordringer: + Omsorgsplan 2015 (tilhørende tiltaksplan). St.meld. nr. 25.
Hovik, S., I. M. Stigen, M. Blekesaune and S. Opedal. 2010. Evaluering av kvalitetskommuneprogrammet. Sluttrapport [Evaluation of the Municipal Quality Program. Final Report]. Collaborative Report by NIBR/NOVA/IRIS. Accessed February 9, 2014. http://www.nibr.no/filer/samarb-rapport%20NIBR-NOVA-IRIS.pdf.
Norsk standard. 2000. “Systemer for kvalitetsstyring—Grunntrekk og terminologi.” [Quality Management Systems—Fundamentals and Vocabulary] ISO 9000: 2000.
Rønning, R. 2004. Omsorg som vare? Kampen om omsorgens sjel i norske kommuner [Care as Commodity? The Fight for the Soul of Care in Norwegian Municipalities]. Gyldendal akademisk forlag.
Slagsvold, B. 1995. Mål eller mening. Om å måle kvalitet i aldersinstitusjoner. [Measure or Meaning. About Measuring Quality in Nursing Homes.] Oslo: NGI Report 1/1995.
Sosialdepartementet. 2002–2003. Betre kvalitet i dei kommunale pleie- og omsorgstenestene. St.meld. nr. 45.
Vabø, M. 2001. “Forbrukermakt—en kilde til bedre omsorgstjenester? [Consumer Power—A Source for Better Care Services?] In K. Thorsen, R. Dahle, and M. Vabø: Makt og avmakt i helse- og omsorgstjenestene, [Power and Powerlessness within the Health- and Care Services], 7–29. Oslo: NOVA Report 18/01.
Wærness, K. 1999. “Omsorg, omsorgsarbeid og omsorgsrasjonalitet—refleksjoner over en sosialpolitisk diskurs.” [Care, Care Work and Care Rationality—Reflections on a Social Political Discourse] In Blir omsorgen borte? Eldreomsorgens hverdag i den senmoderne velferdsstaten [Is Care Being Lost? Elder Care Realities in the Late Modern Welfare State], edited by K. Thorsen and K. Wærness, 46–62. Ad Notam Gyldendal.
Wærness, K. 2010. “Challeges for the Future of Public Care—Lessons from Norway.” In Meeting the Challenges of Elder Care. Japan and Norway, edited by Y. Saito, R. Abe Auestad and K. Wærness, 128–135. Kyoto Universtity Press/Trans Pacific Press.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2014 Campbell, Edvardsen, Midford, Saito
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Edvardsen, U. (2014). Quality of Care Services in Norway. In: Campbell, J.C., Edvardsen, U., Midford, P., Saito, Y. (eds) Eldercare Policies in Japan and Scandinavia. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137402639_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137402639_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-68036-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-40263-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)