Abstract
Most methodological issues you encounter when entering the field of prison as a researcher are common to other settings for research on institutionalised so-called ‘deviants’ (like hospitals, therapeutic communities and identifica- tion centres). The first problem is access to the field. As Goffman (2010 [1961]) argues, the world of inmates (as well as that of staff) is a world that is protected by physical and psychological barriers which make it particu- larly difficult for external subjects to access the field. It is no coincidence that the researchers who first studied prisons were in some way involved in the management of the institution (e.g. Clemmer, as a clinical sociolo- gist). Freedom of movement, in an environment which has been designated to limit freedom, and access to personal data, which are considered sensi- tive, are resources that are not easily made available to outsiders. Conversely, research as an inside observer involved in the running of the institution has considerable limitations and consequences, related to occupational pressures and moral dilemmas (cf. Mar quart 1986). A cultural variable can be added to this, that is to say the different countries’ recognition of the value of scientific research, criminological research in particular: some countries are interested in or at least willing to have their institutions undergo construc- tive assessment and constant monitoring; others are somewhat reluctant to open the doors to their prisons.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baiatta, A. (1982) Criminologia critica e critica del diritto pénale, Bologna: il Mulino.
Becker, H.S. (1967) ‘Whose Side Are We on?’ Social Problems 14: 239–47.
Bourdieu, P. (1992) Risposte. Per una antropologia riflessiva, Torino: Bollati e Boringhieri.
Bourdieu, P. (1993) La misère du monde, Paris: Editions du Seuil.
Bourgois, P. (2005) Cercando rispetto. Drug economy e cultura di strada, Roma: Derive Appro di.
Cicourel, A. (2011) Mêtodo y medida en sociologia, Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones en Sociologia, CIS.
Clemmer, D. (1958 [1940]) The Prison Community, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Ferreccio, V. (2012) ‘La larga sombra de la prision: un estudio de los darios colaterales del encarcelamiento en Argentina’, Paper presented at the 54 International Congress of Americanist, Vienna, 15 July 2012.
Ferreccio, V. (2013) ‘Familiäres de detenidos y violencia instituaonal en la provin-cia de Santa Fe’, Paper presented at the Workshop ‘Delito y Sociedad’, Santa Fe, 4 December 2013.
Foucault, M. (1975) Sorvegliare epunire. Nascita della prigione, Torino: Einaudi.
Garland, D. (1993) Punishment and Modern Society: A Study in Social Theory, University of Chicago Press.
Goffman, E. (2010 [1961]) Asylums. Le istituzioni totali: i meccanismi dell’esclusione e della violenza, Torino: Einaudi.
Liebling, A. (2001) ‘Whose Side Are We on? Theory, Practice and Allegiances in Prison Research’ British Journal of Criminology 41: 472–84.
Marquart, J.W. (1986) ‘Doing Research in Prison: The Strengths and Weaknesses of Full Participation as a Guard’ Justice Quarterly III, 1: 15–32.
Pavarini, M. (1992) ‘Historia de la pena. La justificacion imposible’ Delito y Sociedad. Revista de Ciencias Sociales 1(1): 22–36.
Pavarini, M. (1997) ‘Lacriminalitàpunita. Processi di carcerizzazione nell’Italia del XX secolo’. In L. Violante (éd.) La criminalità, Torino: Einaudi.
Pavarini, M. (2006) ‘La ‘lotta per i diritti dei detenuti’ tra riduzionismo e abolizion-ismo carcerari’ Antigone. Quadrimestrale di critica del sistemapénale epenitenziario 1(1): 82–96.
Rostaing, C. (2006) ‘La comprension sociologique de l’expérience carcérale’ Revue européenne des sciences sociales XLIV(135): 29–43.
Sarzotti, C. (2010) ‘Il campo giuridico del penitenziario: appunti per una ricostruzione’. In E. Santoro (ed.) Diritto come questione sociale, Torino: Giappichelli, pp. 123–79.
Sbraccia, A. and Vianello, F. (2010) Sociologia della devianza e della criminalità, Bari and Roma: Laterza.
Scheper-Hughes, N. (1992) Death Without Weeping: The Violence of Everyday Life in Brazil, University of California Press.
Sykes, G. (1958) The Society ofCaptives: A Study of a Maximum-Security Prison, Princeton University Press.
Vianello, F. (2013a) ‘Daily Life in Overcrowded Prisons: A Convict Perspective on Italian detention’ Prison Service Journal, May 2013, 207: 27–33.
Vianello, F. (2013b) ‘Biographical trajectories, prison careers and effects of detention’, Paper presented at the Interlabo on ‘Doing research in Prison’, Groupe Européen de Recherche sur les Normativités (Gern), Padoue, 11 October 2013.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Vanina Ferreccio and Francesca Vianello
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ferreccio, V., Vianello, F. (2014). Doing Research in Prison: How to Resist Institutional Pressures. In: Lumsden, K., Winter, A. (eds) Reflexivity in Criminological Research. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137379405_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137379405_20
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47874-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-37940-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)