Abstract
At the heart of critical theory is the examination of forms of consciousness and their relation to the social structures patterned by administrative-capitalist logics. The pathologies that plague mass societies are seen to be expressions of specific forms of life that lead to alienated or reified forms of consciousness that actively distract subjects from a critical confrontation with the constellations of power that constitute their social world. Underlying this research program was a tacit acceptance of a causal relation between the sociostructural domain of human life—of economic logics, of the imperatives of rationalized institutions, and so on—on the one hand and the content of subjective mental states, powers of cognition, experience, and the “lifeworld” on the other. This was at the heart of what we could call the classical paradigm of critical theory where Marxian insights of political economy, in one form or the other, were accepted as a basis from which to theorize the pathologies of consciousness. But this has been gradually displaced by currents in contemporary critical theory which have advocated the thesis that the basis of an emancipatory consciousness and praxis lies hidden within the rhythms of everyday life. Whether this is seen to be the structures of language and communication and everyday speech acts, or the intersubjective and recognitive relations that lead to a critical awareness of social injustices, the dominant approach that has concerned these theorists and their followers has been a pragmatist-inspired critique of Marxist and idealist ideas that predominated the classical paradigm of critical theory.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bottero, W., and K. Prandy. 2003. “Social Interaction, Distance and Stratification.” British Journal of Sociology 54, no. 2: 177–197.
Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
—. 1985. “The Social Space and the Genesis of Groups.” Theory and Society 14: 723–744.
—. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Choldin, H. 1978. “Social Life and the Physical Environment.” In Handbook of Contemporary Urban Life, ed. D. Street et al. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Chombart de Lauwe, P.-H. 1956. Famille et habitation. Vol. 1, La vie quotidienne des familles ouvrières. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.
Davis, S. 1986. Parades and Power: Street Theatre in Nineteenth-Century Philadelphia. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
—. 1959. Famille et habitation. Vol. 2, Scienes humaines et conceptions de l’habitation. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.
—. 1960. “L’évolution des besoins et la conception dynamique de la famille.” Revue Française de Sociologie 1: 403–425.
Deranty, J.-P. 2013. “Marx, Honneth and the Tasks of Contemporary Critical Theory.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16, no. 4: 745–758.
Deutsch, K. 1961. “On Social Communication and the Metropolis.” In The Future Metropolis, ed. Lloyd Rodwin. New York: George Braziller.
Downs, R. 1970. “The Cognitive Structure of an Urban Shopping Center.” Environment and Behavior 2: 13–39.
Downs, R., and D. Stea. 1970. “From the Outside Looking in at the Inside Looking Out.” Environment and Behavior 2: 3–12.
Foucault, M. 1986. “Heterotopias.” Diacritics 16, no. 1: 22–28.
Gale, N., and R. Golledge. 1982. “On the Subjective Partitioning of Space.” Annals of American Geographers 72, no. 1: 60–67.
Gilmore, D. 1977. “The Social Organization of Space: Class, Cognition, and Residence in a Spanish Town.” American Ethnologist 4, no. 3: 437–451.
Goffman, E. 1971. Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Harper and Row.
—. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper and Row.
Goodsell, C. 1988. The Social Meaning of Civil Space: Studying Political Authority through Architecture. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
Habermas, J. 1987. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
—. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Harvey, D. 1987. The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Conditions of Cultural Change. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
—. 2006. Paris: Capital of Modernity. New York: Routledge.
—. 2009. Cosmopolitanism and the Geographies of Freedom. New York: Columbia University Press.
Honneth, A. 1996. The Struggle for Recognition: A Grammar of Moral Conflicts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
—. 2008. Reification: A New Look at an Old Idea. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jacobs, J. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Vintage.
Ketcham, R. 1987. Individualism and Public L fe: A Modern Dilemma. New York: Basil Blackwell.
Kögler, H. 1997. “Alienation as Epistemological Source: Reflexivity and Social Background after Mannheim and Bourdieu.” Social Epistemology 11, no. 2: 141–164.
Kohn, M. 2003. Radical Space: Building the House of the People. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Lefebvre, H. 1991. The Production of Space. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Lofland, L. 1998. The Public Realm: Exploring the City’s Quintessential Social Territory. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Sanders, B. 1998. The Private Death of Public Discourse. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Soja, E. 1982. “The Socio-Spatial Dialectics.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 70: 207–225.
Sorre, M. 1957. Recontres de lagéographie et de la sociologie. Paris: Rivière.
Thompson, M. 2009a. “Democracy, Public Reason, and Suburban Life.” Monu: Magazine on Urbanism 2: 75–89.
—. 2009b. “What Is Antiurbanism? A Theoretical Perspective.” In Fleeing the City: Studies in the Culture and Politics of Antiurbanism, ed. M. Thompson. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
—. 2011. “Talcott Parsons and the Logic of Critical Social Theory.” Situations 4, no. 2: 141–168.
—. 2012. “The Suburban Origins of the Tea Party: The Spatial Origins of New Conservative Personality.” Critical Sociology 38, no. 4: 511–528.
Tonboe, J. 1986. “On the Political Importance of Space: The Socio-Spatial Relations of Trade Unions, Gender, and the Decentralized Danish Welfare State.” Acta Sociologica 29, no. 1: 13–30.
Urry, J. 1981. “Localities, Regions and Social Class.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 5: 455–475.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2014 Diana Boros and James M. Glass
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thompson, M.J. (2014). Spatial Form and the Pathologies of Public Reason: Toward a Critical Theory of Space. In: Boros, D., Glass, J.M. (eds) Re-Imagining Public Space. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137373311_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137373311_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-48052-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-37331-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political Science CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)