Skip to main content
  • 176 Accesses

Abstract

As we celebrate a century of Indian cinema, it seems like an opportune moment to take stock of the continuities as well as breaks that have attended to the formation.1 A hundred years after D. G. Phalke’s Raja Harishchandra first dazzled Indian audiences (1913), the notion of the figural, we suggest, continues to offer especially fecund points of entry. Consider, for example, the recent Hindi film OMG: Oh My God (2012) in which Bollywood star Akshay Kumar, quite literally, plays god. His new avatar, “Krishna Vasudev Yadav from Gokul,” wears designer suits, speaks in English, and in a particular sequence, watches the proceedings in the world below perched atop a skyscraper, rather like Batman. Like the Marvel superhero, Krishna swoops down the side of the building on a motorized vehicle—a gigantic motorcycle—and, via some rather clunky special effects, rescues the hapless (potential devotee) Kanji Lalji Mehta (Paresh Rawal) from a pursuing mob of would-be assassins. While this particular imbrication of the cosmic and the cosmopolitan may be somewhat novel,2 Indian cinema has a long history of locating the transcendental within the everyday, as in early mythologicals and devotionals, and it did so especially by mobilizing a figural mode.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Works cited

  • Basu, Anustup, “The Eternal Return and Overcoming ‘Cape Fear’: Science, Sensation, Superman and Hindu Nationalism in Recent Hindi cinema,” South Asian History and Culture, 2:4, 2011, pp. 557–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas, Moinak, “To Abbreviate/to Narrate: Ray’s Postmaster” in Sucheta Mukherjee and Aditi Das Gupta (eds), Cross-Currents in the Modern Short Story, Calcutta: Loreto College, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenez, Nicole, “Glossaire.” Admiranda, 5, 1990, pp. 75–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, Dipesh, “Clothing and the Political man,” Journal of Human Values, 5:3, 1999, pp. 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donna Haraway, “A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in The Late Twentieth Century,” in Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (New York; Routledge, 1991), pp. 149–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, Richard, Stars, London: BFI, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Internet trolls make Aamir Khan and Shah Rukh Khan quit Twitter?” IBNLive, March 6, 2013, http://ibnlive.in.com/news/trolls-make-aamir-khan-and-shah-rukh-khan-quit-twitter/376964-8-66.html (accessed on March 12, 2013).

  • Lyotard, Jean Francois, Discourse, Figure, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majumdar, Neepa, Wanted Cultured Ladies Only: Female Stardom and Cinema in India 1930s–1950s, Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Adrian, “Last Day Every Day: Figural Thinking from Auerbach and Kacauer to Agamben and Brenez,” Brooklyn, NY: Punctum Books, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazumdar, Ranjani, Bombay Cinema: An Archive of the City, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nandy, Ashis, “Introduction: Indian Cinema as Slum’s Eye View of Politics,” The Secret Politics of Our Desires: Innocence, Culpability and Indian Popular Cinema, London: Zed Books, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, Madhava, “Genre Mixing as Creative Fabrication,” BioScope: South Asian Screen Studies, 2, 2011, pp. 69–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajadhyaksha, Ashis, “The Phalke Era: Conflict of Traditional Form and Modern Technology,” Journal of Arts and Ideas, no. 14–15, 1987, pp. 47–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, Susan, “The Decay of Cinema,” New York Times Magazine, February 25, 1996, pp. 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasudevan, Ravi, “Devotional Transformation: Miracles, Mechanical Artifice, and Spectatorship in Indian Cinema,” Postscripts, 1.2–1.3, 2005, pp. 237–257.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Meheli Sen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sen, M. (2013). Introduction. In: Sen, M., Basu, A. (eds) Figurations in Indian Film. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137349781_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics