Abstract
In his “Notes on the Legacy of Rosa Luxemburg,” Stephen Eric Bronner reflects on the question of the contemporary significance of the ideas of the thinker and fighter he calls “the most important representative of a libertarian socialist tradition inspired by internationalism, economic justice, and a radical belief in democracy.” At a time when the global justice movement is leading more people to question neoliberal—and, for some, capitalist—certainties and to search for alternatives, Bronner’s question is timely. His rejection of dogmatically “regurgitating the old slogans or finding the appropriate citations from her pamphlets and speeches” and his suggestion that the inadequacies of Luxemburg’s thought deserve to be treated much as Luxemburg critically appraised Marx’s work are praiseworthy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This Marxist approach is concisely and eloquently restated in Michael A. Lebowitz, “Reclaiming a Socialist Vision,” Monthly Review (June 2001), pp. 41–47.
Rosa Luxemburg, Reform or Revolution (London: Bookmarks, 1989), p. 75.
Norman Geras, The Legacy of Rosa Luxemburg (London: Verso, 1983), p. 160.
Rosa Luxemburg, “The Russian Revolution,” in Mary-Alice Waters, ed., Rosa Luxemburg Speaks (New York: Pathfinder, 1970), pp. 393–94.
Luxemburg, Reform or Revolution, p. 41. Three notable relevant works on the state are Mark Neocleous, Administering Civil Society: Towards a Theory of State Power (London and New York: Macmillan and St. Martin’s, 1996);
Philip Corrigan and Derek Sayer, The Great Arch: English State Formation as Cultural Revolution (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1985);
Werner Bonefeld and John Holloway, eds., Global Capital, National State and the Politics of Money (New York: St. Martin’s, 1995).
James C. Scott’s Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998) contains much interesting material, although its theoretical framework is, in my view, weaker than that of the above-mentioned books.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2013 Jason Schulman
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Camfield, D. (2013). A Second Reply to Stephen Eric Bronner. In: Schulman, J. (eds) Rosa Luxemburg. Critical Political Theory and Radical Practice. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137343321_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137343321_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-46810-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-34332-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)