Skip to main content
  • 186 Accesses

Abstract

Progress is steady and gradual as the agricultural and services sectors switch ranks. Global manufacturing holds its share steady except during the Soviet collapse.

The rate of change in agriculture correlates to changes in wealth, but predicting future trends based on historic data proves questionable. In a complete reversal from past decades, a falling manufacturing share correlates with rising wealth; the cause is rising productivity. Developing countries can benefit from shifting to manufacturing while advanced countries can benefit by shifting to services. A chart of structural shift can be used as an indicator of political stability. Similarities are revealed between the path of mature industrial economies and today’s rising stars. China’s current path bears a remarkable resemblance to that of Sweden’s of a century ago.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.GROW/ countries/1W?display=graph (Accessed January 11, 2013).

  2. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Summary of Food and Agricultural Statistics 2003, Rome, 2003; p. 69.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid., p. 72.

    Google Scholar 

  4. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, International Accounts Products for Detailed Goods Trade Data. U.S. Trade in Goods (IDS-0008)http://www.bea.gov/international/detailed_trade_data.htm (Accessed January 6, 2013).

  5. Ibid., pp. 10, 18, 19.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Kuznets, “Quantitative Aspects of the Economic Growth of Nations: II. Industrial Distribution of National Product and Labor Force,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 5, No. 4, Supplement (July 1957), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. P. Smits, P. J. Woltjer and D. Ma (2009), A Dataset on Comparative Historical National Accounts, ca. 1870–1950: A Time-Series Perspective, Groningen Growth and Development Centre Research Memorandum GD-107, Groningen: University of Groningen. http://www.rug.nl/research/ggdc/data/historicalnational-accounts (Accessed 12 February 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  8. The equation is y = 114.4 x-1.09.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Joe Atikian

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Atikian, J. (2013). Speeding Up, Slowing Down. In: Industrial Shift: The Structure of the New World Economy. Palgrave Pivot, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137340313_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics