Abstract
Today the use of nuclear weapons is practically unthinkable. It is hard to imagine a circumstance in which the use of such weapons could be politically or morally justified. Yet the spectre of nuclear war ending history itself casts a surprisingly small shadow over how we have constructed the ethics of twentieth century foreign affairs. Cold War narratives have traditionally placed great emphasis on the idea that credible threats of mutually assured destruction explain the puzzle of ‘non-use’ since 1945. In so doing they uphold the realist account of time as one in which material power and military force shape past and present. Or in plainer terms, meaning is power and Thrasymachus was right in seeing visions of imaginative civilising action as illusory.
For our struggle is not against enemies of blood and flesh, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers of this present darkness.
Eph: 6: 12
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The key texts are Tannenwald (2007) and T. V. Paul’s The Tradition of Non-Use of Nuclear Weapons (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2009).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Jonathan Gorry
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gorry, J. (2013). Introduction. In: Cold War Christians and the Spectre of Nuclear Deterrence, 1945–1959. Histories of the Sacred and the Secular 1700–2000. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137334244_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137334244_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-46265-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-33424-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)