Abstract
Dynamic and pluralist religion plays a vital role in development in contemporary Brazil. As advisors that supplement and, occasionally, even substitute for a state bureaucracy absent or overwhelmed in many vulnerable areas, Brazilian religious organisations are once again becoming the favoured partners of the state. This reconfiguration is taking place under markedly different conditions than in the colonial era, when the throne and the altar worked together in an intimate relationship. Since then, successive constitutions have imposed the legal separation of politics and religion. On a social level, however, the two spheres today appear dedicated to cooperation. This chapter analyses the current tendency of the Brazilian government to ‘contract’ an increasing number of religious entities to deliver and manage many of its social development responsibilities in ‘Public-religious partnerships’. In light of this trend, the time has come to reconsider the historical relationship between the state and the Church (es) in Brazil, a phenomenon currently characterised by the advent of a ‘Supplemental secularism’.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Amirkhanyan, A., H. J. Kim and K. T. Lambright (2009) ‘Faith-Based Assumptions about Performance: Does Church Affiliation Matter for Service Quality and Access?’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(3), pp. 490–521, DOI: 10.1177/0899764008320031.
BÖckstrÖm, A. and G. Davie (eds) (2010–11) Welfare and Religion in 21st Century Europe, 2 vols (Farnham and Burlington: Ashgate).
Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (1998) ‘ma reforma gerencial da Administração Público no Brasil’, Revista do Serviço Público, 49(1), pp. 5–42, http://www.enap.gov.br/index.php?option=com_docman& task=doc_view& gid=2888 (accessed on 9 October).
Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (2001) ‘Uma nova gestão para um novo Estado: liberal, social e republicano’, Revista do Serviço Público, 52(1), pp. 5–24, http://www.enap.gov.br/index.php?option=com_ docman& task=doc_download& gid=2670.
Chaves, M. (1999) ‘Religious Congregations and Welfare Reform: Who Will Take Advantage of ‘Charitable Choice’?’, American Sociological Review, 64(6), pp. 836–46, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2657405.
Corten, A. (1999) ‘Pentecôtisme et ‘néo-pentecôtisme’ au Brésil’, Archives de sciences sociales des religions, 105, pp. 163–83, DOI: 10.3406/assr.1999.1083.
Davie, G. (2002) Europe: The Exceptional Case: Parameters of Faith in the Modern World (London: Orbis Books).
DIAP (Departamento Intersindical de Assessoria Parlamentar) (2011) Radiografia do Novo Congresso: Legislatura 2011/2015 (Brasília: DIAP).
Freston, P. (1993) ‘Protestantes e política no Brasil: da constituinte ao Impeachment’, doctoral thesis, Department of Social Sciences (São Paulo: State University of Campinas).
Government of Brazil ‘Transparency Portal’, http://www.portaltransparencia.gov.br (accessed on 22 September 2011).
Jawad, R. (2009) Social Welfare and Religion in the Middle East: A Lebanese Perspective (Bristol and Portland: Policy Press).
Mariz, C. (1992) ‘Religion and Poverty in Brazil: A Comparison of Catholic and Pentecostal Communities’, Sociological Analysis, 53, Special Issue, pp. S63–70, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3711251.
Nesti, A. (ed.) (2002) After the Militant, the Volunteer beyond the Secularization: European Identity, Welfare State, Religion (s) (Milan: Franco Angeli).
Oro, A. P. and P. Semán (2000) ‘Pentecostalism in the Southern Cone Countries: Overview and Perspectives’, International Sociology, 15(4), pp. 605–27, DOI: 10.1177/0268580900015004003.
Pierucci, A. F. and J. R. Prandi (1996) A realidade social das religiões no Brasil (São Paulo: Editora Hucitec).
Rocha Andrade da Silva, E. (coor.) (2004) O direito à convivÖncia familiar e comunitária: os abrigos para crianças e adolescentes no Brasil (Brasília: Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada e Conselho Nacional dos Direitos da Criança e do Adolescente).
Sager, R. (2010) Faith, Politics, and Power: The Politics of Faith-based Initiatives (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Sager, R. and L. S. Stephens (2005) ‘Serving Up Sermons: Clients’ Reactions to Religious Elements at Congregation-Run Feeding Establishments’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34(3), pp. 297–315, DOI: 10.1177/0899764005275203.
Shupe, A. D. and B. Misztal (1998) Religion, Mobilization, and Social Action (Westport, CT: Praeger).
Weiss, H. (2002) ‘Reorganising Social Welfare among Muslims: Islamic Voluntarism and Other Forms of Communal Support in Northern Ghana’, Journal of Religion in Africa, 32(1), pp. 83–109, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1581673.
Wineburg, R. J. (2001) A Limited Partnership: The Politics of Religion, Welfare, and Social Service (New York: Columbia University Press).
Wineburg, R. J. (2007) Faith-based Inefficiency: The Follies of Bush’s Initiatives (Westport, CT: Praeger).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Eliott Mourier
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mourier, E. (2013). Religion as a Social Substitute for the State: Faith-Based Social Action in Twenty-First-Century Brazil. In: Carbonnier, G., Kartas, M., Silva, K.T. (eds) International Development Policy: Religion and Development. International Development Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137329387_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137329387_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-32937-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-32938-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)