Skip to main content

Religion, Crisis Pregnancies, and the Battle over Abortion

Redefining Conflict and Consensus in the American Pro-Life Movement

  • Chapter
Religion in Disputes

Abstract

The abortion wars have continued unabated in the United States in recent years. The pro-life movement has introduced a raft of new legislation in many states designed to further reduce the number and scope of legal abortion services, including “fetal heartbeat,” “fetal pain,”1 and “previability” bills and mandatory ultrasound requirements for women seeking abortions (Kliff, 2011; Smyth, 2011; Crane et al., 2012). At the same time, the national debate in 2011 over the almost four trillion dollar federal budget hinged on just a few million dollars provided to women’s clinics by Congress (Steinhauer, 2011). These are the kinds of battles most people have come to expect of the abortion issue in America. Forty-five percent of Americans consider themselves “pro-life” (Jones and Saad, 2011), and the pro-life movement2 in the United States has enjoyed grassroots support and broad mobilization for more than 35 years now. The movement is well established not only through longstanding social movement organizations but also through deep connections to the political, legal, and religious institutions of the country.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bane, M. J., B. Coffin, and R. Higgins, eds. Taking Faith Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J., J. Hwang, and R. M. McCleary. “Religious Conversion in 40 Countries.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 49, no. 1 (2010): 15–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benford, R. D., and D. A. Snow. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 26, (2000): 611–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, G. The Moral Veto: Framing Contraception, Abortion, and Cultural Pluralism in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Condit, C. M. Decoding Abortion Rhetoric: Communicating Social Change. Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, D., Lissy Moskowitz, Cristi Schwarcz, Leslie McGorman, Vanessa Wellbery, Lauren Birchfield, Kate Vlach, Rachel Tabakman, Jennifer Wang, Amber Banks, Mhairi Purdie, and Jillian Foster. Who Decides? The Status of Women’s Reproductive Rights in the United States. Washington, DC: NARAL Pro-Choice America Foundation, 2012. Retrieved http://www.prochoiceam-erica.org/assets/download-files/2011-who-decides.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P., J. Evans, and B. Bryson. “‘Have Americans’ Social Attitudes Become More Polarized?” American Journal of Sociology 102, no. 3 (1996): 690–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferree, M. M., W. A. Gamson, J. Gerhards, and D. Rucht. Shaping Abortion Discourse: Democracy and the Public Sphere in Germany and the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Finke, R., and R. Stark. The Churching of America, 1776–2005: Winners and Losers in Our Religious Economy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D. Activism, Inc.: How the Outsourcing of Grassroots Campaigns is Strangling Progressive Politics in America. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttmacher Institute. State Policies in Brief: Requirements for Ultrasound. New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2012. http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/spibs/spib_RFU.pdf (accessed October 4, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Halfmann, D. “Recognizing Medicalization and Demedicalization: Discourses, Practices, and Identities.” Health 16, no. 2 (2011): 186–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J., and L. Saad. “Gallup poll social series: values and beliefs.” Gallup News Service. http://www.gallup.com/poll/File/147740/Abortion_110523.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kliff, S. “The big abortion fight that may not happen.” Politico, April 19, 2011. http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0411/53432_Page2.html (accessed April 21, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luker, K. Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, C. J. C. Pro-Life Activists in America: Meaning, Motivation, and Direct Action. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munson, Z. The Making of Pro-life Activists: How Social Movement Mobilization Works. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munson, Z., and C. Scheitle. Crisis Pregnancy Centers and Coming Changes to the Abortion Debate. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Religion Denver, CO, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Abortion Federation. NAF Violence and Disruption Statistics. Washington, DC: National Abortion Federation, 2009. http://www.prochoice.org/pubs_research/publications/downloads/about_abortion/stats_table2009.pdf (accessed March 1, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Risen, J., and J. L. Thomas. Wrath of Angels: The American Abortion War. New York: Basic Books, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sack, K. “In ultrasound, abortion fight has new front.” The New York Times May 27, 2010http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/28/health/policy/28ultrasound.html (accessed June 16, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, B. The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less. New York: Ecco, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, T. Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life. Normon: University of Oklahoma Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J. C. “Anti-abortion groups adopt in-your-face tactics.” ABC News March 3, 2011. http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=13041275 (accessed March 4, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D. A, E. B. Rochford, S. K. Worden, and R. D. Benford. “Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation.” American Sociological Review 51, no. 4 (1986): 464–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staggenborg, S. The Pro-Choice Movement: Organization and Activism in the Abortion Conflict. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinhauer, J. “Abortion dispute complicates budget negotiations.” The New York Times April 7, 2011. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/08/us/politics/08riders.html?_r=1&scp=3&sq=abortion%20budget&st=cse (accessed April 27, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, S. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Franz von Benda-Beckmann Keebet von Benda-Beckmann Martin Ramstedt Bertram Turner

Copyright information

© 2013 Franz von Benda-Beckmann, Keebet von Benda-Beckmann Martin Ramstedt, and Bertram Turner

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Munson, Z. (2013). Religion, Crisis Pregnancies, and the Battle over Abortion. In: von Benda-Beckmann, F., von Benda-Beckmann, K., Ramstedt, M., Turner, B. (eds) Religion in Disputes. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137318343_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics