Abstract
If one asks the question ‘How is Sraffa’s book, and the system of theory contained within it, related to the scope and content of economics as a whole?’, the answer, on one level, seems clear and obvious half a century on. On the one hand, it reconstructs with a new coherence at least a foundational element of classical economics, a tradition running from William Petty and Richard Cantillon to David Ricardo and Karl Marx, and beyond. On the other, that same system of theory entails a critique of the marginalist approach to the theory of functional income distribution, insofar as the latter relies upon well-behaved substitutability between ‘factors of production’ for generating demand functions for factors. Absent that supply-and-demand approach to factor pricing, the supply-and-demand approach to commodity prices and quantities also collapses (Garegnani, 1983).
I am indebted to R. Ciccone, M. Lavoie, A. Stirati and G. White for comment, without thereby implicating them in the final product.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aspromourgos, T. (2004) ‘Sraffian research programmes and unorthodox economics’, Review of Political Economy, 16: 179–206.
Aspromourgos, T. (2009a) ‘Economic Science and the Left: Thoughts on Sraffa’s Equations and the Efficacy of Organized Labor’, in F. S. Lee and J. Bekken (eds), Radical Economics and Labor: Essays Inspired by the IWW Centennial (London: Routledge).
Aspromourgos, T. (2009b) The Science of Wealth: Adam Smith and the Framing of Political Economy (London: Routledge).
Aspromourgos, T., Rees, D. and White, G. (2010) ‘Public debt sustainability and alternative theories of interest’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34: 433–47.
Barba, A. and Pivetti, M. (2009) ‘Rising household debt: its causes and macroeconomic implications — a long-period analysis’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33: 113–37.
Ciccone, R. (1986) ‘Accumulation and capacity utilization: some critical considerations on Joan Robinson’s theory of distribution’, Political Economy: Studies in the Surplus Approach, 2: 17–36.
Clifton, J. A. (1977) ‘Competition and the evolution of the capitalist mode of production’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1: 137–51.
Clifton, J. A. (1983) ‘Administered prices in the context of capitalist development’, Contributions to Political Economy, 2: 23–38.
Eatwell, J. and Milgate, M. (eds) (1983) Keynes’s Economics and the Theory of Value and Distribution (London: Duckworth).
Garegnani, P. (1962) Il Problema della Domanda Effettiva nello Sviluppo Economico Italiano (Roma: Associazione per lo Sviluppo dell’industria nel Mezzogiorno (SVIMEZ)).
Garegnani, P. (1964–65) ‘Note su consumi, investimenti e domanda effettiva’, Economia Internazionale, 17: 591–631; and 18: 575–617.
Garegnani, P. (1978–79) ‘Notes on Consumption, Investment and Effective Demand’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2, 335–53 and 3, 63–82 (repr. in Eatwell and Milgate, 1983).
Garegnani, P. (1979) ‘Notes on consumption, investment and effective demand: a reply to Joan Robinson’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 3: 181–7.
Garegnani, P. (1983) ‘The classical theory of wages and the role of demand schedules in the determination of relative prices’, American Economic Review, 73 (Papers and Proceedings): 309–13.
Garegnani, P. (1984) ‘Value and distribution in the classical economists and Marx’, Oxford Economic Papers, 36: 291–325.
Garegnani, P. (1987) ‘Surplus Approach to Value and Distribution’, in J. Eatwell, M. Milgate and P. Newman (eds), The New Palgrave: a Dictionary of Economics, vol. 4 (London: Macmillan).
Garegnani, P. (1990) ‘Sraffa: Classical versus Marginalist Analysis’, in K. Bharadwaj and B. Schefold (eds), Essays on Piero Sraffa: Critical Perspectives on the Revival of Classical Theory (London: Unwin Hyman).
Garegnani, P. (1992) ‘Some Notes for an Analysis of Accumulation’, in J. Halevi, D. Laibman and E. J. Nell (eds), Beyond the Steady State: A Revival of Growth Theory (New York: St. Martin’s).
Garegnani, P. and Trezzini, A. (2010) ‘Cycles and growth: a source of demand-driven endogenous growth’, Review of Political Economy, 22: 119–25.
Hahn, F. (1982) ‘The neo-Ricardians’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 6: 353–74.
Harcourt, G. C., Roncaglia, A. and Rowley, R. (eds) (1995) Income and Employment in Theory and Practice: Essays in Memory of Athanasios Asimakopulos (London: Macmillan).
Keynes, J. M. (1936) The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (London: Macmillan).
Kurz, H. D. (1985) ‘Effective demand in a “classical” model of value and distribution: the multiplier in a Sraffian framework’, The Manchester School, 53: 121–37
H. D. Kurz (1990) Capital, Distribution and Effective Demand: Studies in the ‘Classical’ Approach to Economic Theory (Cambridge: Polity).
Kurz, H. D. and Salvadori, N. (2002) ‘Mark Blaug on the “Sraffian interpretation of the surplus approach”’, History of Political Economy, 34: 225–36.
Kurz, H. D. and Salvadori, N. (2003) ‘Understanding “Classical” Economics: A Reply to Mark Blaug’, in H. D. Kurz and N. Salvadori, Classical Economics and Modern Theory: Studies in Long-Period Analysis (London: Routledge).
Kurz, H. D. and Salvadori, N. (2005) ‘Representing the production and circulation of commodities in material terms: on Sraffa’s objectivism’, Review of Political Economy, 17: 413–41
H. D. Kurz, L. L. Pasinetti and N. Salvadori (eds) (2008), Piero Sraffa: the Man and the Scholar. Exploring His Unpublished Papers (London: Routledge).
Lavoie, M. (2009) ‘Cadrisme within a Post-Keynesian model of growth and distribution’, Review of Political Economy, 21: 369–91.
Mainwaring, L. (1992) ‘Steedman’s critique: a tentative response from a tentative Kaleckian’, Review of Political Economy, 4: 171–7.
Palumbo, A. and Trezzini, A. (2003) ‘Growth without normal capacity utilization’, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 10: 109–35.
Panico, C. (1988) Interest and Profit in the Theories of Value and Distribution (London: Macmillan).
Pivetti, M. (1985) ‘On the monetary explanation of distribution’, Political Economy: Studies in the Surplus Approach, 1: 73–103.
Pivetti, M. (1991) An Essay on Money and Distribution (New York: St Martin’s Press).
Pivetti, M. (2001) ‘Money Endogeneity and Monetary Non-neutrality: A Sraffian Perspective’, in L.-P. Rochon and M. Vernengo (eds), Credit, Interest Rates and the Open Economy: Essays on Horizontalism (Cheltenham: Elgar).
Ranchetti, F. (2001) ‘On the Relationship between Sraffa and Keynes’, in T. Cozzi and R. Marchionatti (eds), Piero Sraffa’s Political Economy: A Centenary Estimate (London: Routledge).
Robbins, L. (1935) An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, 2nd edn (London: Macmillan).
Robinson, J. (1979) ‘Garegnani on effective demand’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 3: 179–80.
Semmler, W. (1984) Competition, Monopoly, and Differential Profit Rates: On the Relevance of the Classical and Marxian Theories of Production Prices for Modern Industrial and Corporate Pricing (New York: Columbia University Press).
Serrano, F. (1995) ‘Long period effective demand and the Sraffian supermultiplier’, Contributions to Political Economy, 14: 67–90.
Skinner, A. S. (1996) A System of Social Science: Papers Relating to Adam Smith, 2nd edn (Oxford: Clarendon).
Sraffa, P. (1960) Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities: Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Steedman, I. (1977) Marx After Sraffa (London: New Left Books).
Steedman, I. (1984) ‘Natural prices, differential profit rates and the classical competitive process’, The Manchester School, 52: 123–40.
Steedman, I. (1992) ‘Questions for Kaleckians’, Review of Political Economy, 4: 125–51.
Stirati, A. (2001) ‘Inflation, unemployment and hysteresis: an alternative view’, Review of Political Economy, 13: 427–51.
Vianello, F. (1985) ‘The pace of accumulation’, Political Economy: Studies in the Surplus Approach, 1(1): 69–87.
White, G. (2006) ‘Demand-Led Growth and the Classical Approach to Value and Distribution: Are They Incompatible?’, in N. Salvadori (ed.), Economic Growth and Distribution: On the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (Cheltenham: Elgar).
Wicksteed, P. H. (1914) ‘The scope and method of political economy in the light of the “marginal” theory of value and distribution’, Economic Journal, 24: 1–23.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Tony Aspromourgos
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aspromourgos, T. (2013). Sraffa’s System in Relation to Some Main Currents in Unorthodox Economics. In: Levrero, E.S., Palumbo, A., Stirati, A. (eds) Sraffa and the Reconstruction of Economic Theory: Volume Three. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137314048_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137314048_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-34705-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-31404-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)