Skip to main content

Do National Levels of Individualism and Internal Locus of Control Relate to Well-Being: An Ecological Level International Study

  • Chapter
From Stress to Wellbeing Volume 1

Abstract

There has been increasing interest in cross-national research that attempts to understand differences and similarities among employees from different cultures and nations. One of the basic issues of concern to organizational researchers is the health and well-being of employees, and it has been viewed as both a response to the work environment and as an affect-related antecedent of other employee outcomes such as job performance or turnover. Employee control beliefs and perceptions have been linked to well-being and play an important role (Ganster and Fusilier, 1989; Spector, 1982). Although there is a tremendous amount of research at the individual level relating control and other variables to well-being, most has been done in the USA and a handful of western nations, and most has targeted the individual employee. Our study compared managers from 24 nations/territories at the ecological or sample mean level (Leung and Bond, 1989), as opposed to the individual participant level, in order to draw more definitive conclusions about nation differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bae K, Chung C. 1997. Cultural values and work attitudes of Korean industrial workers in comparison with those of the United States and Japan. Work and Occupations 24: 80–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagat RS, Kedia BL, Crawford SE, Kaplan MR. 1990. Cross-cultural issues in organizational psychology: emergent trends and directions for research in the 1990s. In International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 1990, Cooper CL, Robertson IT (eds). John Wiley: Chichester; 59–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao GT. 2000. Multilevel issues and culture: an integrative view. In Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions, Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ (eds). Jossey-Bass: San Francisco; 308–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper CL, Williams S. 1996. Occupational Stress Indicator Version 2.0. NFER-Nelson: Windsor, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper CL, Sloan SJ, Williams S. 1988. Occupational Stress Indicator Management Guide. NFER-Nelson: Windsor, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFrank RS, Ivancevich JM, Schweiger DM. 1988. Job stress and psychological well-being: similarities and differences among American, Japanese, and Indian managers. Behavioral Medicine 14: 160–170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frese M, Kring W, Soose A, Zempel J. 1996. Personal initiative at work: differences between East and West Germany. Academy of Management Journal 39: 37–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganster DC, Fusilier MR. 1989. Control in the workplace. In International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 1989, Cooper CL, Robertson IT (eds). John Wiley: Chichester; 235–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudykunst WB. 1998. Individualistic and collectivistic perspectives on communication: an introduction. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 22: 107–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman JR, Oldham GR. 1976. Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 16: 250–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamid PN. 1994. Self-monitoring, locus of control, and social encounters of Chinese and New Zealand students. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 25: 353–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho DY, Chiu C. 1994. Component ideas of individualism, collectivism, and social organization: an application in the study of Chinese culture. In Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications, Kim U et al. (eds). Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA; 137–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G. 1984. The cultural relativity of the quality of life concept. Academy of Management Review 9: 389–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G. 1994. Values Survey Module 1994 Manual. Institute for Research on Intercultural Cooperation: Maastrict, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui CH. 1982. Locus of control: a review of cross-cultural research. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 6: 301–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hui CH, Yee C, Eastman KL. 1995. The relationship between individualism — collectivism and job satisfaction. Applied Psychology: An International Review 44: 276–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilola LM. 1990. Culture and health. In Applied Cross-Cultural Psychology, Brislin RW (ed.). Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA; 278–301.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Iwata N, Roberts RE. 1996. Age differences among Japanese on the center for epidemiologic studies depression scale: an ethnocultural perspective on somatization. Social Science Medicine 43: 967–974.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iwata N, Okuyama Y, Kawakami Y, Saito K. 1989. Prevalence of depressive symptoms in a Japanese occupational setting: a preliminary study. American Journal of Public Health 79: 1486–1489.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iwata N, Roberts CR, Kawakami N. 1995. Japan-U.S. comparison of responses to depression scale items among adult workers. Psychiatry Research 58: 237–245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iwata N, Umesue M, Egashira K, Hiro H, Mizoue T, Mishima N, Nagata S. 1998. Can positive affect items be used to assess depressive disorder in the Japanese population? Psychological Medicine 28: 153–158.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson SE, Schuler RS. 1985. A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work settings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 36: 16–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson TP. 1998. Approaches to equivalence in cross-cultural and cross-national research. In Cross-Cultural Survey Equivalence, Harkness JA (ed.). ZUMA: Mannheim, Germany; 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D. 1992. LISREL VIII: A Guide to the Program and Applications. Scientific Software: Mooresville, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagitçibasi Ç. 1994. A critical appraisal of individualism and collectivism. In Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications, Kim U et al. (eds). Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA; 52–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karasek RA, Jr. 1979. Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly 24: 285–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein KJ, Bliese PD, Kozlowski SWJ, Dansereau F, Gavin MB, Griffin MA, Hofmann DA, James LR, Yammarino FJ, Bligh M. 2000. Multilevel analytical techniques: commonalities, differences, and continuing questions. In Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions, Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ (eds). Jossey-Bass: San Francisco; 512–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobasa SC, Maddi SR, Kahn S. 1982. Hardiness and health: a prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42: 168–177.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski SWJ, Klein KJ. 2000. A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions, Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ (eds). Jossey-Bass: San Francisco; 3–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung K, Bond MH. 1989. On the empirical identification of dimensions for cross-cultural comparisons. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 20: 133–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln JR, Hanada M, Olson J. 1981. Cultural orientations and individual reactions to organizations: a study of employees of Japanese-owned firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 26: 93–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg CD, Peterson MR 1994. The meaning of working in U.S. and Japanese local governments at three hierarchical levels. Human Relations 47: 1459–1487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus HR, Kitayama S. 1991. Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review 98: 224–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus HR, Kitayama S. 1998. The cultural psychology of personality. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 29: 63–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick IA, Cooper CL. 1988. Executive stress: extending the international comparison. Human Relations 41: 65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgeson FP, Hofmann DA. 1999. The structure and function of collective constructs: implications for multilevel research and theory development. Academy of Management Review 24: 249–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally JC. 1978. Psychometric Theory, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson MF, Smith PB, Akande A, Ayestaran S, Bochner S, Callan V, Cho NG, Jesuino JC, D’Amorim M, Francois PH, Hofmann K, Koopman PL, Leung K, Lim TK, Mortazavi S, Munene J, Radford M, Ropo A, Savage G, Setiadi B, Sinha TN, Sorenson R, Viedge C. 1995. Role conflict, ambiguity, and overload: a 21-nation study. Academy of Management Journal 38: 429–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reykowski J. 1994. Collectivism and individualism as dimensions of social change. In Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications, Kim U et al. (eds). Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA; 276–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riordan CM, Vandenberg RJ. 1994. A central question in cross-cultural research: Do employees of different cultures interpret work-related measures in an equivalent manner? Journal of Management 20: 643–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson IT, Cooper CL, Williams J. 1990. The validity of the Occupational Stress Indicator. Work & Stress 4: 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronen S, Shenkar O. 1985. Clustering countries on attitudinal dimensions: a review and synthesis. Academy of Management Review 10: 435–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadri G, Marcoulides GA, Cooper CL, Kirkcaldy B. 1996. Testing a model of occupational stress across different countries. Journal of Business and Management Winter: 10–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaubroeck J, Green SG. 1989. Confirmatory factor analytic procedures for assessing change during organizational entry. Journal of Applied Psychology 74: 892–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siu OL, Cooper CL. 1998. A study of occupational stress, job satisfaction and quitting intention in Hong Kong firms: the role of locus of control and organizational commitment. Stress Medicine 14: 55–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha D, Tripathi RC. 1994. Individualism in a collectivist culture: a case of coexistence of opposites. In Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications, Kim U et al. (eds). Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA; 123–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha JBP, Verma J. 1994. Social support as a moderator of the relationship between allocentrism and psychological well-being. In Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications, Kim U et al. (eds). Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA; 267–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith PB, Misumi J. 1989. Japanese management: a sun rising in the West? In International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 1989, Cooper CL, Robertson IT (eds). John Wiley: Chichester; 329–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith PB, Trompenaars F, Dugan S. 1995. The Rotter locus of control scale in 43 countries: a test of cultural relativity. International Journal of Psychology 30: 377–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector PE. 1982. Behavior in organizations as a function of employee’s locus of control. Psychological Bulletin 91: 482–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector PE. 1986. Perceived control by employees: a meta-analysis of studies concerning autonomy and participation at work. Human Relations 39: 1005–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector PE. 1988. Development of the Work Locus of Control Scale. Journal of Occupational Psychology 61: 335–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector PE. 1997. Job Satisfaction: Application, Assessment, Causes, and Consequences. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector PE, O’Connell BJ. 1994. The contribution of personality traits, negative affectivity, locus of control and Type A to the subsequent reports of job stressors and job strains. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 67: 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector PE, Cooper CL, Sanchez JI, O’Driscoll M, Sparks K, Bernin P, Büssing A, Dewe P, Hart P, Lu L, Miller K, Renault de Moraes L, Ostrognay GM, Pagon M, Pitariu H, Poelmans S, Radhakrishnan P, Russinova V, Salamatov V, Salgado J Shima S, Siu OL, Stora JB, Teichmann M, Theorell T, Vlerick P, Westman M, Widerszal-Bazyl M, Wong P, Yu S. in press (a). A 24 nation/territory study of work locus of control in relation to well-being at work: how generalizable are western findings? Academy of Management Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector PE, Cooper CL, Sparks K, Bernin P, Büssing A, Dewe P, Lu L, Miller K, Renault de Moraes L, O’Driscoll M, Pagon M, Pitariu H, Poelmans S, Radhakrishnan P, Russinova V, Salamatov V, Salgado J, Sanchez JI, Shima S, Siu OL, Stora JB, Teichmann M, Theorell T, Vlerick P, Westman M, Widerszal-Bazyl M, Wong P, Yu S. 2001. An international study of the psychometric properties of the Hofstede Values Survey Module 1994: a comparison of individual and nation/province level results. Applied Psychology: An International Review 50: 269–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobacyk JJ, Tobacyk ZS. 1992. Comparisons of belief-based personality constructs in Polish and American university students. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 23: 311–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triandis HC. 1994. Culture and Social Behavior. McGraw-Hill: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis HC. 1995. Individualism & Collectivism. Westview: Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vijver F, Leung K. 1997. Methods and Data Analysis for Cross-Cultural Research. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Paul E. Spector, Cary L. Cooper, Juan I. Sanchez, Michael O’Driscoll, Kate Sparks, Peggy Bernin, Andre Büssing, Phil Dewe, Peter Hart, Luo Lu, Karen Miller, Lucio Flavio Renault De Moraes, Gabrielle M. Ostrognay, Milan Pagon, Horea Pitariu, Steven Poelmans, Phani Radhakrishnan, Vesselina Russinova, Vladimir Salamatov, Jesus Salgado, Satoru Shima, Oi Ling Siu, Jean Benjamin Stora, Mare Teichmann, Töres Theorell, Peter Vlerick, Mina Westman, Maria Widerszal-Bazyl, Paul Wong and Shanfa Yu

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Spector, P.E. et al. (2013). Do National Levels of Individualism and Internal Locus of Control Relate to Well-Being: An Ecological Level International Study. In: Cooper, C.L. (eds) From Stress to Wellbeing Volume 1. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137310651_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics