Abstract
Patient-centred care has captured the attention of healthcare providers, payers (public and private) and patients in many North American and European health systems. ‘One of the ethical imperatives of patient-centered care is the balanced, evidence-based presentation of risks and benefits by providers to patients’ (Weinstein et al. 2007). This ethical imperative may be put into practice through the use of shared decisionmaking (SDM). SDM is defined as ‘a collaborative process that allows patients and their providers to make health care decisions together, taking into account the best scientific evidence available, as well as the patient’s values and preferences’ (American Medical Association 2010).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Medical Association. (2010) ‘Shared decision-making,’ CMS Report 7-A-10:1–6.
Arterburn, D., Wellman, R., Westbrook, E., Rutter, C., Ross, T., McCulloch, D., et al. (2012) ‘Introducing decision aids at Group Health was linked to sharply lower hip and knee surgery rates and costs.’ Health Affairs 31(9): 2094–2104.
Informed Medical Decisions Foundation. (2012) ‘What is Shared Decision Making?’ http://informedmedicaldecisions.org/what-is-shared-decision-making/. Accessed 11/18/12.
Keiser, K., Kohl-Welles, J., Shin, P., Rasmussen, M. (2007) ‘Providing high quality, affordable health care to Washingtonians based on the recommendations of the blue ribbon commission on health care costs and access.’ SB 5930 (60th Legislature, Washington State Senate).
National Institutes of Health. (2012) ‘National Institutes of Health (NIH) Agency-Specific Quality Strategic Plan.’ National Strategy for Quality Improvement in Health Care http://www.ahrq.gov/workingforquality/nqs/nqsplans5. htm. Accessed 11/18/12.
Weinstein, JN., Clay, K., Morgan, TS. (2007) ‘Informed patient choice: Patient-centered valuing of surgical risks and benefits.’ Health Affairs 26(3): 726–730.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Anne D. Renz, Carolyn A. Watts and Douglas A. Conrad
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Renz, A.D., Watts, C.A., Conrad, D.A. (2013). Shared Decision-Making and Decision Aid Implementation: Stakeholder Views. In: Keating, M.A., McDermott, A.M., Montgomery, K. (eds) Patient-Centred Health Care. Organizational Behaviour in Health Care. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137308931_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137308931_15
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45622-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-30893-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)