Skip to main content

The Generation of Domestic Technological Capabilities: Measuring the Impact of the Contributions of Jorge Katz

  • Chapter
Learning, Capability Building and Innovation for Development

Part of the book series: EADI Global Development ((EADI))

  • 123 Accesses

Abstract

At the end of the 1960s economic thinking in Latin America was dominated by the neoclassical micro world in its most stylized way. As Katz (1987) clearly stated, the paradigm behind the technological behaviour of firms was associated with a representative agent that took decisions based on free technical information. Under these assumptions, there was no space for exploring the technological problem, which was simply assumed. In addition, the diffusion of technical knowledge at an international level was related to the acquisition of a technological package generated in developed economies. In this context, the prevailing idea was that Latin American firms were passive recipients of technology, so that the transfer of technology involved unidirectional flows of knowledge from external sources to the firms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Aisati, M. and M. Carloni (2010), “SCOPUS: Innovation at a Glance”. Conference, Padua, Italy, 8 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arza, V. (2007), “¿Cómo influye el contexto macroeconómico en el comportamiento de largo plazo de las empresas? Decisiones empresariales de inversión en I+Dyen maquinaria en Argentina durante los años 1990s”. Desarrollo Económico, 47(187), 459–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M. (1984), “‘Learning’ and the Accumulation of Industrial Technological Capacity in Developing Countries”, in K. King and M. Fransman (eds), Technological Capacity in the Third World. London: MacMillan, pp. 187–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M. and K. Pavitt (1993), “Technological Accumulation and Industrial Growth: Contrast Between Developed and Developing Countries”. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2(2), 157–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M. and K. Pavitt (1995), “The Development of Technological Capabilities”, in I.U. Haque (ed.), Trade, Technology and International Competitiveness. Washington: The World Bank, pp. 69–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benavente, J.M., G. Crespi, J. Katz, and G. Stumpo (1996), “Changes in the Industrial Development of Latin America”. CEPAL Review, (60), 49–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benavente, J.M., G. Crespi, J. Katz, and G. Stumpo (1997), “New Problems and Opportunities for Industrial Development in Latin America”. Oxford Development Studies, 25(3), 261–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassiolato, J.E., H.M.M. Lastres, and M.L. Maciel (eds) (2003), Systems of Innovation and Development. Evidence from Brazil. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chudnovsky, D. and J. Katz (1970a), “Patentes e importación de tecnología”. Económica, (1), enero–abril.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chudnovsky, D. and J. Katz (1970b), Patentes y Actividad Inventiva Individual. Buenos Aires: CIE, Instituto di Tella.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cimoli, M. and J. Katz (2003), “Structural Reforms, Technological Gaps and Economic Development: a Latin American perspective”. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(2), 387–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W.M. and D.A. Levinthal (1990), “Absorptive Capacity: a New Perspective on Learning and Innovation”. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlman, C. and L.E. Westphal (1982), “Technological Effort in Industrial Development. An Interpretative Survey of Recent Research”, in F. Stewart and J. James (eds), The Economics of New Technology in Developing Countries. London: Frances Pinter, pp. 105–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlman, C., B. Ross-Larsen, and L.E. Westphal (1987), “Managing Technological Development”. World Development, 15(6), 759–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diez, M.A. (2009), “El dependentismo en Argentina: una historia de los claroscuros del campo académico entre 1966 y 1976”. PhD thesis, Argentina: Universidad Nacional de Cuyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutrénit, G. (2000), Learning and Knowledge Management in the Firm: From Knowledge Accumulation to Strategic Capability. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutrénit, G. (2007), “The Transition From Building-up Innovative Technological Capabilities to Leadership by Latecomer Firms”. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 15(2), 125–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutrénit, G. and Vera-Cruz, A.O. (2007), “Triggers of the Technological Capability Accumulation in MNCs’ Subsidiaries: the Maquilas in Mexico”. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 3(2/3), 315–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraz, J.C., D. Kupfer, and F.L.P. Serrano (1999), “Macro/micro Interactions: Economic and Institutional Uncertainties and Structural Change in the Brazilian Industry”. Oxford Development Studies, 27(3), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueiredo, P.N. (2001), Technological Learning and Competitive Performance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furtado, C. (1961), Desenvolvimento e subdesenvolvimento. Rio de Janeiro: FCE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbert-Copley, B. (1990), “Technical Change in Latin American Manufacturing Firms: Review and Synthesis”. World Development, 18(11), 1457–1468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intarakumnerd, P. (2000), Thai Telecommunication Business Groups: An Analysis of the Factors Shaping the Direction of their Growth Paths, DPhil Thesis. Brighton: SPRU, University of Sussex, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (1969), Production Functions, Foreign Investment and Growth. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (1971), “Importación de tecnología, aprendizaje local e industrialización independiente”, working paper. Buenos Aires: CIE, Instituto Di Tella.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (1976), Importatión de tecnología, aprendizaje local e industrializatión independiente. México: FCE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (1978), “Creación de tecnología en el sector manufacturero argentino”, El Trimestre Economico, XLV(177), 167–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (1980), “Domestic Technology Generation in LCDS: a Review of Research Findings”, working paper N. 35, Buenos Aires: BID/ECLA/UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (1982 and 1986), “Cambio tecnológico en la industria metalmecánica latinoamericana”, working papers. Buenos Aires: IDB/CEPAL/CIID/UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (1982), “Technology and Economic Development: An Overview of Research Findings”, in M. Syrquin and S. Teitel (eds), Trade, Stability, Technology and Equity in Latin America, 282–315. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (1984), “Domestic Technological Innovations and Dynamic Comparative Advantage: Further Reflections on a Comparative Case-study Program”. Journal of Development Economics, 16(1-2), 13–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (2000a), “Pasado y presente del comportamiento tecnologico de América Latina”. CEPAL, Serie Desarrollo Productivo, N° 75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (2000b), “Structural Change and Labor Productivity Growth in Latin American Manufacturing Industries 1970–1996”, working paper, CEPAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (2000c), Reformas estructurales, productividad y conducta tecnologica en América Latina. Santiago de Chile: FCE/CEPAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (2000d), “Cambios en la estructura y comportamiento del aparato productivo latinoamericano en los años noventa: después del ‘Consenso de Washington’, ¿qué?”. Serie Desarrollo Productivo, No. 65, Santiago de Chile, CEPAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (2001a), “Structural Reforms and Technological Behaviour the Sources and Nature of Technological Change in Latin America in the 1990s”. Research Policy, 30, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (2001b), Structural Reforms, Productivity and Technological Change in Latin America. Santiago de Chile: Libros de la CEPAL No. 64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (2001c), Reformas estructurales, productividad y conducta tecnológica en América Latina. Santiago de Chile: FCE/CEPAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (ed.) (1986), Desarrollo y crisis de la capacidad tecnológica latinoamericana.Buenos Aires: IDB/CEPAL/CIID/UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (ed.) (1987), Technology Generation in Latin American Manufacturing Industries, London: MacMillan Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. and E. Ablin (1979), “Infant Industry to Technology Exports the Argentine Experience in the International Sale of Industrial Plants and Engineering Works”, working paper No. 14, Buenos Aires: IDB/ECLAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. and R. Cibotti (1976), Marco de referencia para un programa de investigación en temas de ciencia y tecnología en América Latina. Buenos Aires: CEPAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. and R. Cibotti (1978), “Marco de referencia para un programa de investigación en temas de ciencia y tecnología en la América Latina”. El Trimestre Económico, XLV(177), 139–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. and B. Kosacoff (2000), “Technological Learning, Institution Building and the Microeconomics of Import Substitution”, in E. Cardenas, J.A. Ocampo, and R. Thorp (eds), Industrialization and the State in Latin America: the postwar years, 36–58. Oxford: Palgrave/St. Antony’s College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, L. (1997), From Imitation to Innovation: the Dynamics of Korea’s Technological Learning, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosacoff, B. (ed.) (2003), Componentes macroeconómicos, sectoriales y microeconómicos para una estrategia nacional de desarrollo. Lineamientos para fortalecer las fuentes de crecimiento económico. Buenos Aires: IADB/ECLAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lall, S. (1987), Learningto Industrialize. London: MacMillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lall, S. (1992), “Technological Capabilities and Industrialization”. World Development, 20(2), 165–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lall, S. and C. Pietrobelli (2002), Failing to Compete. Technology Development and Technology Systems in Africa. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., F. de Moya-Anegón, and V.P. Guerrero-Bote (2010), “Journal Maps on the Bases of Scopus Data: A Comparison with the Journal Citation Reports of the ISI”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(2), 352–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorentzen, J. (2009), “Learning by Firms: the Black Box of South Africa’s Innovation System”. Science and Public Policy, 36(1), 33–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.A. (1992), National Systems ofInnovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, A., C. Pietrobelli, and R. Rabellotti (2008), “Global Value Chains and Technological Capabilities: A Framework to Study Learning and Innovation in Developing Countries”. Oxford Development Studies, 36(1), 39–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moya-Anegón, F. de, Z. Chinchilla-Rodríguez, B. Vargas-Quesada, E. Corera-Álvarez, F.J. Muñoz-Fernández, A. González-Molina, and V. Herrero-Solana (2007), “Coverage Analysis of Scopus: A Journal Metric Approach”. Scientometrics, 73(1), 53–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muchie, M., P. Gammeltoft, and B.Å. Lundvall (eds) (2003), Putting Africa First. The Making of African Innovation Systems, Aalborg, Denmark: Aalborg University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R (ed.) (1993), National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R. and S.G. Winter (1973), “Toward an Evolutionary Theory of Economic Capabilities”. American Economic Review, 63(2), 440–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R. and S.G. Winter (1974), “Neoclassical vs. Evolutionary Theories of Economic Growth: Critique and Prospectus”. Economic Journal, 84(336), 886–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R. and S.G. Winter (1977), “In Search of a Useful Theory of Innovation”. Research Policy, 6(1), 36–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R. and S.G. Winter (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prebisch, R. (1949), “Introduccion: el desarrollo economico de la América Latina y algunos de sus principales problemas”, in CEPAL (1949), Estudio Económico de América Latina, 1948. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasiah, R. (2004), “Exports and Technological Capabilities: A Study of Foreign and Local Firms in the Electronics Industry in Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines and Thailand”. European Journal of Development Research, 16(3), 581–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D., G. Pisano, and A. Shuen (1997), “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management”. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vera-Cruz, A.O. (2004), Cultura de la empresa, aprendizaje y capacidades tecnológicas. El caso de las cerveceras mexicanas, Mexico: UAM/ADIAT/M.A. Porrúa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vera-Cruz, A.O. (2006), “Firms’ Culture and Technological Behaviour: The Case of Two Breweries in Mexico”. International Journal of Technology Management, 36(1/2/3), 148–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westphal, L., L. Kim, and C. Dahlman (1985), “Reflections on the Republic of Korea’s Acquisition of Technological Capability”, in N. Rosenberg and C. Frischtak (eds), International Technology, New York: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Gabriela Dutrénit

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dutrénit, G. (2013). The Generation of Domestic Technological Capabilities: Measuring the Impact of the Contributions of Jorge Katz. In: Dutrénit, G., Lee, K., Nelson, R., Vera-Cruz, A.O., Soete, L. (eds) Learning, Capability Building and Innovation for Development. EADI Global Development. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137306937_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics