Abstract
Our everyday experience of living in the here-and-now is performed through a complex network of relationships and meanings attached to people, things and ideas. Yet some organizational spaces we occupy matter more than others (cf. Halford & Leonard, 2006; Tyler & Cohen, 2010). A challenge is to study organizational spaces as they are being performed (Beyes & Steyaert, 2011), particularly with a focus on different changing modes of materiality as artefacts move and shape spaces and simultaneously change the artefacts and their materiality (Knox et al., 2008). In this chapter we draw upon two different but overlapping strands of research: the study of organizational spaces and materiality. Space and spatial practices have in different ways gained new interest within social sciences with the writings of, for example, Michel Serres, Edward Soja, Nigel Thrift, Gilles Deleuze and Michel Augé. The idea of space being a product of social relationships or networks reveals space as compelling and controlling, and providing social boundaries for subjectivity. But it also opens up space to be challenged: we can liberate ourselves from the cages and prisons in which we find ourselves. But space is also material with walls, tables, staircases and computer software providing important building blocks of spatial practices. In this chapter we particularly highlight the anthropological work of Daniel Miller and the ways in which matter becomes meaningful and changes in different contexts and places.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beyes, T. & C. Steyaert (2011) ‘Spacing organization: non-representational theory and performing organizational space’, Organization, 19, 45–61.
Brants, K. & Y. de Haan (2010) ‘Taking the public seriously: three models of responsiveness in media and journalism’, Media, Culture & Society, 32, 411–428.
Bruni, A. (2005) ‘Shadowing software and clinical records: on the ethnography of non-humans and heterogeneous contexts’, Organization, 12, 357–378.
Collins, R. (2011) ‘Content online and the end of public media? The UK, a canary in the coal mine?’, Media, Culture & Society, 33, 1202–1219.
Czarniawska, B. & T. Hernes (Eds.) (2005). Actor-network theory and organizing. Malmö, Sweden: Liber.
Dale, K. (2000) Anatomising embodiment and organisation theory. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dale, K. (2005) ‘Building a social materiality: spatial and embodied politics in organization in control’, Organization, 23, 649–678.
Dale, K. & G. Burrell (2007) The spaces of organisation and the organisation of space: power, identity and materiality at work. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Denegri-Knott, J. & M. Molesworth (2010) ‘Concepts and practices of digital virtual consumption’, Consumption Markets & Culture, 13, 109–132.
Dent, M. (2003) ‘Managing doctors and saving a hospital: irony, rhetoric and actor networks’, Organization, 10, 107–127.
Deuze, M. (2007a) ‘Convergence culture in the creative industries’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 10, 243–263.
Deuze, M. (2007b) Media work. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Engeström, Y. & F Blackler (2005) ‘On the life of the object’, Organization, 12, 307–330.
Feldman, M. & B. Pentland (2005) ‘Organizational routines and the macro.-actor’, In B. Czarniawska & T. Hernes (Eds.), Actor-network theory and organizing (pp. 91–111). Malmö, Sweden: Liber.
Feldman, M. & W.J. Orlikowski (2011) ‘Theorizing practice and practicing theory’, Organization Science, 22, 1240–1253.
Fleming, P. & A. Spicer (2004)’ “You can checkout anytime, but you can never leave”: spatial boundaries in a high commitment organization’, Human Relations, 57, 75–94.
Fuentes, C. (2011) Green retailing: A socio-material analysis. Lund: Lund University.
Gherardi, S. (2008) ‘Situated Knowledge and Situated Action’, In D. Barry & H. Hansen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of new approaches in management and organization (pp. 516–525). London: Sage Publications.
Halford, S. & P. Leonard (2006) ‘Place, space and time: contextualizing workplace subjectivity’, Organization Studies, 27, 657–676.
Haraway, D. (1988) ‘Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective’, Feminist Studies, 14, 575–599.
Harris, A. (2008) ‘Young women, late modern politics, and the participatory possibilities of online cultures’, Journal of Youth Studies, 11, 481–495.
Hassard, J. & N. Lee (1999) ‘Actor network theory and managerialism’, Organization, 6, 357–90.
Hay, J. & N. Couldry (2011) ‘Rethinking convergence/culture’, Cultural Studies, 25, 473–486.
Hernes, T. (2004) The spatial construction of organization. Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins.
Hindmarsh, J. & A. Pilnick (2007) ‘Knowing bodies at work: embodiment and ephemeral teamwork in anaesthesia’, Organization Studies, 28, 1395–1416.
Jenkins, H. (2006) Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.
Knorr Cetina, K. (1997) ‘Sociality with objects: social relations in postsocial knowledge societies’, Theory, Culture & Society, 14, 1–30.
Knox, H., D. O’Doherty, T. Vurdubakis & C. Westrup (2008) ‘Enacting airports: space, movement and modes of ordering’, Organization, 15, 869–888.
Kornberger, M. & S.R. Clegg (2004) ‘Bringing space back in: organizing the generative building’, Organization Studies, 25, 1095–1114.
Kornberger, M. & S.R. Clegg (Eds.) (2006) Space, organizations and management theory. Malmö: Liber; Copenhagen, DK: Copenhagen Business School Press.
Kozinets, R.V., A. Hemetsberger & H. Schau (2008) ‘The wisdom of consumer crowds: collective innovation in the age of networked marketing’, Journal of Macromarketing, 28, 339–354.
Lash, S. & C. Lury (2007). Global culture industry. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Lee, H-K. (2011) ‘Participatory media fandom: a case study of anime fansubbing’, Media, Culture & Society, 33, 1131–1147.
Lefebvre, H. (1974/1991) The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Lövheim, M. (2011) ‘Young women’s blogs as ethical spaces’, Information, Communication & Society, 14, 338–354.
Massey, D. (2005) For space. London: SAGE.
McGivern, G. & S. Dopson (2010) ‘Inter-epistemic power and transforming knowledge objects in a biomedical network’, Organization Studies, 31, 1667–1686.
Miller, D. (1987) Material culture and mass consumption. Oxford: Blackwell.
Miller, D. (2005) ‘Materiality: an introduction’, In Daniel Miller (Ed.), Materiality (pp. 1–50). Durham: Duke University Press.
Miller, D. (2008) The comfort of things. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Miller, D. (2009) Stuff. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Miller, D. (2011) Tales from Facebook. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Munir, K. &J. Jones (2004) ‘Discontinuity and after: the social dynamics of technology evolution and dominance’, Organization Studies, 25, 561–581.
Mutch, A. (2002) ‘Actors and networks or agents and structures: towards a realist view of information systems’, Organization, 9, 477–496.
Myers, F. (2005) ‘Some properties of art and culture: ontologies of the image and economies of exchange’, In Daniel Miller (Ed.), Materiality (pp. 88–117). Durham: Duke University Press.
Orlikowski, W.J. (2007) ‘Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work’, Organization Studies, 28, 1435–1448.
Pickering, A. (1995) The mangle of practice: time, agency and science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Rennstam, J. (2012) ‘Object-control: a study of technologically dense knowledge work’, Organization Studies, 33, 1071–1090.
Ritzer, G., P. Dean & N. Jurgenson (2012) ‘The coming of age of the prosumer’, American Behavioral Scientist, 56, 379–398.
Scott, S.V. & W.J. Orlikowski (2012) ‘Reconfiguring relations of accountability: materialization of social media in the travel sector’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37, 26–40.
Suchman, L. (2007) Human – machine reconfigurations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Tyler, M. & L. Cohen (2010) ‘Spaces that matter: gender performativity and organizational space’, Organization Studies, 31, 175–198.
Wapshott, R. & O. Mallett (2011) ‘The spatial implications of homeworking: a Lefebvrian approach to the rewards and challenges of home-based work’, Organization, 19, 63–79.
Yakhlef, A. (2010) ‘The corporeality of practice-based learning’, Organization Studies, 31, 409–430.
Zhang, Z., A. Spicer & P. Hancock (2008) ‘Hyper-organizational space in the work of J. G. Ballard’. Organization, 15, 889–910.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Lotta Häkkinen and Nina Kivinen
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Häkkinen, L., Kivinen, N. (2013). Writing Spaces — Performativity in Media Work. In: de Vaujany, FX., Mitev, N. (eds) Materiality and Space. Technology, Work and Globalization. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137304094_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137304094_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45438-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-30409-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)