Skip to main content

Writing Spaces — Performativity in Media Work

  • Chapter
Materiality and Space

Part of the book series: Technology, Work and Globalization ((TWG))

Abstract

Our everyday experience of living in the here-and-now is performed through a complex network of relationships and meanings attached to people, things and ideas. Yet some organizational spaces we occupy matter more than others (cf. Halford & Leonard, 2006; Tyler & Cohen, 2010). A challenge is to study organizational spaces as they are being performed (Beyes & Steyaert, 2011), particularly with a focus on different changing modes of materiality as artefacts move and shape spaces and simultaneously change the artefacts and their materiality (Knox et al., 2008). In this chapter we draw upon two different but overlapping strands of research: the study of organizational spaces and materiality. Space and spatial practices have in different ways gained new interest within social sciences with the writings of, for example, Michel Serres, Edward Soja, Nigel Thrift, Gilles Deleuze and Michel Augé. The idea of space being a product of social relationships or networks reveals space as compelling and controlling, and providing social boundaries for subjectivity. But it also opens up space to be challenged: we can liberate ourselves from the cages and prisons in which we find ourselves. But space is also material with walls, tables, staircases and computer software providing important building blocks of spatial practices. In this chapter we particularly highlight the anthropological work of Daniel Miller and the ways in which matter becomes meaningful and changes in different contexts and places.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beyes, T. & C. Steyaert (2011) ‘Spacing organization: non-representational theory and performing organizational space’, Organization, 19, 45–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brants, K. & Y. de Haan (2010) ‘Taking the public seriously: three models of responsiveness in media and journalism’, Media, Culture & Society, 32, 411–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruni, A. (2005) ‘Shadowing software and clinical records: on the ethnography of non-humans and heterogeneous contexts’, Organization, 12, 357–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (2011) ‘Content online and the end of public media? The UK, a canary in the coal mine?’, Media, Culture & Society, 33, 1202–1219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska, B. & T. Hernes (Eds.) (2005). Actor-network theory and organizing. Malmö, Sweden: Liber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, K. (2000) Anatomising embodiment and organisation theory. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dale, K. (2005) ‘Building a social materiality: spatial and embodied politics in organization in control’, Organization, 23, 649–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale, K. & G. Burrell (2007) The spaces of organisation and the organisation of space: power, identity and materiality at work. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denegri-Knott, J. & M. Molesworth (2010) ‘Concepts and practices of digital virtual consumption’, Consumption Markets & Culture, 13, 109–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dent, M. (2003) ‘Managing doctors and saving a hospital: irony, rhetoric and actor networks’, Organization, 10, 107–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deuze, M. (2007a) ‘Convergence culture in the creative industries’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 10, 243–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deuze, M. (2007b) Media work. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. & F Blackler (2005) ‘On the life of the object’, Organization, 12, 307–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M. & B. Pentland (2005) ‘Organizational routines and the macro.-actor’, In B. Czarniawska & T. Hernes (Eds.), Actor-network theory and organizing (pp. 91–111). Malmö, Sweden: Liber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M. & W.J. Orlikowski (2011) ‘Theorizing practice and practicing theory’, Organization Science, 22, 1240–1253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, P. & A. Spicer (2004)’ “You can checkout anytime, but you can never leave”: spatial boundaries in a high commitment organization’, Human Relations, 57, 75–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes, C. (2011) Green retailing: A socio-material analysis. Lund: Lund University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S. (2008) ‘Situated Knowledge and Situated Action’, In D. Barry & H. Hansen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of new approaches in management and organization (pp. 516–525). London: Sage Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Halford, S. & P. Leonard (2006) ‘Place, space and time: contextualizing workplace subjectivity’, Organization Studies, 27, 657–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1988) ‘Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective’, Feminist Studies, 14, 575–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2008) ‘Young women, late modern politics, and the participatory possibilities of online cultures’, Journal of Youth Studies, 11, 481–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassard, J. & N. Lee (1999) ‘Actor network theory and managerialism’, Organization, 6, 357–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, J. & N. Couldry (2011) ‘Rethinking convergence/culture’, Cultural Studies, 25, 473–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernes, T. (2004) The spatial construction of organization. Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hindmarsh, J. & A. Pilnick (2007) ‘Knowing bodies at work: embodiment and ephemeral teamwork in anaesthesia’, Organization Studies, 28, 1395–1416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (2006) Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr Cetina, K. (1997) ‘Sociality with objects: social relations in postsocial knowledge societies’, Theory, Culture & Society, 14, 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knox, H., D. O’Doherty, T. Vurdubakis & C. Westrup (2008) ‘Enacting airports: space, movement and modes of ordering’, Organization, 15, 869–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornberger, M. & S.R. Clegg (2004) ‘Bringing space back in: organizing the generative building’, Organization Studies, 25, 1095–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornberger, M. & S.R. Clegg (Eds.) (2006) Space, organizations and management theory. Malmö: Liber; Copenhagen, DK: Copenhagen Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets, R.V., A. Hemetsberger & H. Schau (2008) ‘The wisdom of consumer crowds: collective innovation in the age of networked marketing’, Journal of Macromarketing, 28, 339–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lash, S. & C. Lury (2007). Global culture industry. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H-K. (2011) ‘Participatory media fandom: a case study of anime fansubbing’, Media, Culture & Society, 33, 1131–1147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1974/1991) The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lövheim, M. (2011) ‘Young women’s blogs as ethical spaces’, Information, Communication & Society, 14, 338–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (2005) For space. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGivern, G. & S. Dopson (2010) ‘Inter-epistemic power and transforming knowledge objects in a biomedical network’, Organization Studies, 31, 1667–1686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1987) Material culture and mass consumption. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (2005) ‘Materiality: an introduction’, In Daniel Miller (Ed.), Materiality (pp. 1–50). Durham: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (2008) The comfort of things. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (2009) Stuff. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (2011) Tales from Facebook. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munir, K. &J. Jones (2004) ‘Discontinuity and after: the social dynamics of technology evolution and dominance’, Organization Studies, 25, 561–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutch, A. (2002) ‘Actors and networks or agents and structures: towards a realist view of information systems’, Organization, 9, 477–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, F. (2005) ‘Some properties of art and culture: ontologies of the image and economies of exchange’, In Daniel Miller (Ed.), Materiality (pp. 88–117). Durham: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W.J. (2007) ‘Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work’, Organization Studies, 28, 1435–1448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, A. (1995) The mangle of practice: time, agency and science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rennstam, J. (2012) ‘Object-control: a study of technologically dense knowledge work’, Organization Studies, 33, 1071–1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, G., P. Dean & N. Jurgenson (2012) ‘The coming of age of the prosumer’, American Behavioral Scientist, 56, 379–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S.V. & W.J. Orlikowski (2012) ‘Reconfiguring relations of accountability: materialization of social media in the travel sector’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37, 26–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. (2007) Human – machine reconfigurations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, M. & L. Cohen (2010) ‘Spaces that matter: gender performativity and organizational space’, Organization Studies, 31, 175–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wapshott, R. & O. Mallett (2011) ‘The spatial implications of homeworking: a Lefebvrian approach to the rewards and challenges of home-based work’, Organization, 19, 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yakhlef, A. (2010) ‘The corporeality of practice-based learning’, Organization Studies, 31, 409–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z., A. Spicer & P. Hancock (2008) ‘Hyper-organizational space in the work of J. G. Ballard’. Organization, 15, 889–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Lotta Häkkinen and Nina Kivinen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Häkkinen, L., Kivinen, N. (2013). Writing Spaces — Performativity in Media Work. In: de Vaujany, FX., Mitev, N. (eds) Materiality and Space. Technology, Work and Globalization. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137304094_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics