Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

To the Victors Go the Spoils! Distributed Agencies, Inhumanities and the Case of Comrade Duch of the Khmer Rouge

  • Chapter
Materiality and Space

Part of the book series: Technology, Work and Globalization ((TWG))

Abstract

Can men claim innocence of involvement in massive crimes due to their relative powerlessness to make events transpire otherwise? Should accountability be assigned to the very top level only? Do followers have not only material but also moral responsibilities as facilitators or supporters of bad or evil leadership (Kellerman, 2004)? No: we will argue that even lower-level participants are implicated in power relations and thus can be held responsible (Lukes, 1974). It is not that ‘lower level participants in organizations have power’, as Pfeffer (1992, p. 130) remarked. Clearly not, if we take the meaning of ‘have’ literally: power is not something that one can have, like a cough or a cold, so much as a relational condition. One is always in relations of power for they are inescapable. Power is a constitutive feature of social relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adelman, H. (2000) ‘Rwanda revisited: In search for lessons’, Journal of Genocide Research, 2, 431–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1994), Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil, New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1989) ‘Human agency in social cognitive theory’, American Psychologist, 44, 1175–1184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1999) ‘Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities’, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1991) Modernity and the Holocaust, London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau, M. & D. Robey (2005) ‘Enacting integrated information technology: A human agency perspective’, Organization Science, 16, 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, D. (2000) Voices from S-21: Terror and history in Pol Pot’s secret prison, Chiang Mai, Thailand: Silkworm Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S.R. (1998) ‘Foucault, power and organizations’. In Foucault, management, and organization theory: From panopticon to technologies of self (pp. 29–48). A. McKinley & K. Starkey (eds.). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S.R. (2006) ‘Why is organization theory so ignorant?’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 15, 426–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S.R., D. Courpasson & P. Nelson (2006) Power and organizations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooren, F. (2006) ‘The organizational world as a plenum of agencies’. In Communication as organizing (pp. 81–100). François Cooren, James R. Taylor & Elizabeth Van Every (eds.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVos, G. (1973) Socialization for achievement: Essays on the cultural psychology of the Japanese, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douard, J. (2009) ‘Sex offender as scapegoat: The monstrous other within’, New York Law School Law Review, 53, 31–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1966) Purity and danger, London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop, N. (2005) The lost executioner: The story of Comrade Duch and the Khmer Rouge, London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K.M. & M. Graebner (2007) ‘Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges’, Academy of Management Journal, 50, 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M. & A. Mische (1998) ‘What is agency?’, American Journal of Sociology, 103, 962–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawthrop, T. (2005) ‘The secrets of S21’, Index on Censorship, 34(1), 78–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline and punish, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fusé, T. (1980) ‘Suicide and culture in Japan: A study of seppuku as an institutionalized form of suicide’, Social Psychiatry, 15, 57–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerring, J. (2004) ‘What is a case study and what is it good for?’, American Political Science Review, 98, 341–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J.T. (1991) ‘Training people to inflict pain: State terror and social learning’, Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 31(2), 72–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1986) The constitution of society: Outline of a theory of structuration, London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glad, B. (2002) ‘Why tyrants go too far: Malignant narcissism and absolute power’, Political Psychology, 23, 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1961) Asylums, Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldhagen, D. (1996) Hitler’s willing executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs, K. (2007) ‘Follower propensity to commit crimes of obedience: The role of leadership beliefs’, Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 14, 69–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, A.L. (1998) ‘Why did the Nazis kill? Anthropology, genocide and the Goldhagen controversy’, Anthropology Today, 14(5), 9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, A.L. (2005) Why do they kill? Cambodia in the shadow of genocide, Berkeley, CA: University of Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra, H. & L. Kent Lineback (2005) ‘What’s your story?’, Harvard Business Review, 83(1), 64–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, K. (1989) ‘The ideology of total revolution’. In Cambodia 1975–1978: Rendezvous with death (pp. 37–78). Karl D. Jackson (ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kafka, F. (1999) The trial, London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellerman, B. (2004) Bad leadership, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellerman, B. (2008) Followership: How followers are creating change and changing leaders, Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiernan, B. (2008) The Pol Pot regime, 3rd ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leifer, E. (1988) ‘Interaction preludes to role setting: Exploratory local action’, American Sociological Review, 53, 865–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi, P.M & S.R. Barley (2010) ‘What’s under construction here? Social action, materiality, and power in constructivist studies of technology and organizing’, Academy of Management Annals, 4, 1–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, S. (1974) Power: A radical view, London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meng-Try, E. & S. Sorya (2001) Victims and perpetrators?Testimony of young Khmer Rouge comrades, Phnom Penh: Documentation Center of Cambodia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S. (1974) Obedience to authority: An experimental view, New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nohria, N. & B. Gurtler (2004) ‘Note on human behavior: Character and situation’, Harvard Business School note 9–404-091.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W.J. (2007) ‘Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work’, Organization Studies, 28, 1435–1448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padgett, J.F. & C. Ansell (1993) ‘Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400–1434’, American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1259–1319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1992) Managing with power, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, A. (1993) ‘The mangle of practice: Agency and emergence in the sociology of science’, American Journal of Sociology, 99, 559–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer, D. (2009) ‘Duch hides behind his orders’. Searching for the Truth, English Edition, Fourth Quarter, 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siggelkow, N. (2007) ‘Persuasion with case studies’, Academy of Management Journal, 50, 20–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, T. (2010) Bloodlands, London: Bodley Head.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivas, N. (1999) ‘Managers as androids: Reading moral agency in Philip K. Dick’, Organization, 6(4), 609–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, G.H. (1998) The eight stages of genocide. Retrieved from http://www.genocidewatch.org/aboutgenocide/8stagesofgenocide.html, 1 November 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, P. & Y. Gabriel (2010) ‘Engaging with genocide: The challenge for organization and management studies’, Organization, 17, 461–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strachan, H. (2001) The First World War: Volume 1: To Arms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tat, L. (2009) ‘Bin Samok: soldier of Division 310’. Searching for the Truth, English Edition, Third Quarter, 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thanem, T. (2006) ‘Living on the edge: Towards a monstrous organization theory’, Organization, 13, 163–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Economist (2010) Cambodia’s war-crimes trial: Scarred, not healed, July 31: 42–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, C. (1987) ‘Patenting and academic research: Historical case studies’, Science, Technology & Human Values, 12, 50–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikipedia (2010) Kang Kek Iew: En.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duch, retrieved 28 October 2010.

  • Williams, P. (2004) ‘Witnessing genocide: Vigilance and remembrance at Tuol Sleng and Choeung Ek’, Holocaust and Genocide Studies, 18(2), 234–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, P. (2010) ‘Do normal people commit genocide? Observations from the Cambodian trial of “Duch” ‘, Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 17(4), 495–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Stewart Clegg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Miguel Pina e Cunha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Arménio Rego
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Université Paris-Dauphine, France

    Francois-Xavier de Vaujany

  2. London School of Economics, UK

    Nathalie Mitev

Copyright information

© 2013 Stewart Clegg, Miguel Pina e Cunha and Arménio Rego

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Clegg, S., Pina e Cunha, M., Rego, A. (2013). To the Victors Go the Spoils! Distributed Agencies, Inhumanities and the Case of Comrade Duch of the Khmer Rouge. In: de Vaujany, FX., Mitev, N. (eds) Materiality and Space. Technology, Work and Globalization. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137304094_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation