Skip to main content

Abstract

Without doubt, one of the defining features of the past 30 years has been the ongoing development of digital technology. The scale and pace of innovation in technologies such as computing and mobile telephony has prompted many commentators to portray societal development (at least in the overdeveloped regions of North America, East Asia and Europe) as being more technologically driven than ever before. Manuel Castells (2006, p. 3), for example, puts it as follows: ‘we know that technology does not determine society: it is society’. While a good case can be made for approaching such statements with some scepticism, it is nonetheless undeniable that digital technologies are deeply implicated in contemporary social life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, I. and Seaman, J. (2011) Going the distance, online education in the United States (Newburyport: Sloan Consortium).

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. (2010) Global crises, social justice, and education (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (2007) Education PLC (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, J (2012) ‘This is what modern deregulation looks like: co-optation and contestation in the shaping of the UK’s Open Data Initiative’, Journal of Community Informatics, 8(2), 1712–4441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2000) Liquid modernity (Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992) Risk society (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boden, R. and Epstein, D. (2011) ‘A flat earth society?’ The Sociological Review, 59(3), 467–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D. and Crawford, K. (2012) ‘Critical questions for big data’, Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, H. and Apple, M. (1998) Education, technology, power (Albany: New York University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P. (1997) ‘The third wave’ in H. Lauder, P. Brown and A. Wells (eds), Education: culture, economy and society (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 393–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, M. (2005) ‘The critical turn to public sociology’, Critical Sociology, 31(3), 313–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2006) ‘The network society: from knowledge to policy’ in M. Castells and G. Cardoso (eds), The network society (Washington DC: John Hopkins Centre for Transatlantic Relations), pp. 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, J. and Pachler, N. (2012) ‘Online people tagging: social (mobile) network(ing) services and work-based learning’, British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 711–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, T. and Edwards, D. (2012) ‘Emerging implications of open and linked data for knowledge sharing in development’, IDS Bulletin, 43, 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, J. (2010) Blog theory (Cambridge: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eubanks, V. (2011) Digital dead end (Cambridge MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. and Kotchetkova, I. (2009) ‘Qualitative research and deliberative methods: promise or peril?’ Qualitative Research, 9(5), 625–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Facer, K. and Sandford, R. (2010) ‘The next 25 years? Future directions for research in education technology’, JCAL, 20(6), 74–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Facer, K. (2011) Learning futures: education, technology and social change (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Facer, K. (2012) ‘Personal, relational and beautiful: education, technologies and John Macmurray’s philosophy’, Oxford Review of Education, 38(6), 709–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuery, K. (2009) New media: culture and image (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnham, N. (2000) ‘Information society as theory or ideology?’ Information, Communication and Society, 3(2), 139–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, H., Facer, K., Rudd, T., Dillon P. and Humphreys, P. (2006) Personalization and digital technologies (Bristol: Futurelab).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, M. (2011) Work’s intimacy (Cambridge: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grek, S (2009) ‘Governing by numbers: the PISA “effect” in Europe’, Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith A. and André -Bechely, L. (2008) ‘Institutional technologies’ in M. DeVault (ed.), People at work (New York: New York University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C., Knoblauch, H. and Luff, P (2000) ‘Technology and social interaction: the emergence of “workplace studies”’, British Journal of Sociology, 51(2), 299–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helsper, E. and Eynon, R. (2009) ‘Digital natives: where is the evidence?’ British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 503–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hlynka, D. and Belland, C. (1991) Paradigms regained (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodas, S. (1993) ‘Technology refusal and the organizational culture of schools’, Education Policy Analysis Archives, 1(10). Retrieved 24 April 2013 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v1n10.html

  • Holmwood, J. (2011) Manifesto for public university (London: Bloomsbury).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope, A. (2010) ‘Student resistance to the surveillance curriculum’, International Studies in Sociology of Education 20(4), 319–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, O., Halskov, K. and Leong, T. (2012) ‘Values-led participatory design’, CoDesign, 8(2–3), 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenway, J., Bigum, C., Fitzclarence, L., Collier, J. and Tregenza, K. (1994) ‘New education in new times’, Journal of Education Policy, 9(4), 317–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenway, J. and Fahey, J. (2008) ‘Imagining research otherwise’ in J. Kenway and J. Fahey (eds), Globalizing the research imagination (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, S. (1996) ‘Toward a sociology of educational technology’ in D. Jonassen (ed.), Handbook of research on educational technology (Chicago: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, G. (2004) Critical technology (Aldershot: Ashgate).

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox, D. (2010) Spies in the house of learning: a typology of surveillance in online learning environments. Paper presented to EDGE 2010 — e-Learning: the horizon and beyond conference, Newfoundland, Canada, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauder, H., Brown, P. and Halsey, A. (2009) ‘Sociology of education: a critical history and prospects for the future’, Oxford Review of Education, 35(5), 569–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1981/ 2007) Critique of everyday life: volume three — from modernity to modernism [trans. Elliott, G.] (London: Verso).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewthwaite, S. (2011) Student experiences of social networking and disability in higher education. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Nottingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macarthur Foundation Series on Digital MediaLearning (2007) http://www.mitpress-journals.org/toc/dmal/-/6

  • Mayer, A. and Puller, S. (2008) ‘The old boy (and girl) network’, Journal of Public Economics, 92(1–2), 329–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melhuish, K. and Falloon, G. (2010) ‘Looking to the future: M-learning with the iPad’, Computers in New Zealand Schools, 22(3), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molnar, A. (2005) School commercialism (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, T (2005) Globalization, technological change, and public education (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Natriello, G. (1995) ‘The private and the public’, The Teachers College Record, 97(2), 352–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, D (1984) Computer literacy and ideology (New York: Teachers College Record).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, A. (2000) Experiments in knowing (Cambridge: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • Olin Wright, E. (2010) Envisioning real utopias (London: Verso).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. (2011) ‘Technological determinism in educational technology research’, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(5), 373–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozga, J. (2009) ‘Governing education through data in England’, Journal of Education Policy, 24(2), 149–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popkewitz, T. (2008) ‘Education sciences, schooling and abjection’, South African Journal of Education, 28, 301–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkewitz, T., Olsson, U. and Petersson, K. (2006) ‘The learning society, the unfinished cosmopolitan, and governing education, public health and crime prevention at the beginning of the twenty-first century’, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(4), 431–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rainie, L. and Wellman, B. (2012) Networked: the new social operating system (Cambridge MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruckenstein, M. (2010) ‘Currencies and capitalisms on the internet’, Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 2(4) [https://journals.tdl.org/jvwr/article/view/870], last accessed 22nd August 2012.

  • Schradie, J. (2009) ‘The digital production gap’, Poetics, 39(2), 145–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J., Skbris, Z. and Western, M. (2013) ‘Beneath the “digital native” myth’, Journal of Sociology, 49(1), 97–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. (1995) The media and modernity (Palo Alto CA: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessels, B. (2010) Understanding the Internet (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • White, P. and Selwyn, N. (2012) ‘Learning online? Educational Internet use and participation in adult learning, 2002 to 2010’, Educational Review, 64(4), 451–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum (2011) Personal data: the emergence of a new asset class (Geneva: World Economic Forum) [www.weforum.org/reports/personal-data-emergence-new-asset-class] last accessed 22 August 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M.F.D. (1984) ‘Information technology and the sociology of education: some preliminary thoughts’, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 5(2) 205–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suggestions for further reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, H. and Apple, M. (eds) (1998) Education/technology/power: educational computing as a social practice (New York: SUNY Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Orton-Johnson, K. and Prior, N. (eds) (2013) Digital sociology: critical perspectives (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spring, J. (2012) Education networks: power, wealth, cyberspace and the digital mind (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Keri Facer and Neil Selwyn

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Facer, K., Selwyn, N. (2013). Towards a Sociology of Education and Technology. In: Brooks, R., McCormack, M., Bhopal, K. (eds) Contemporary Debates in the Sociology of Education. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137269881_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics