Skip to main content

Engagé Film and the Public Sphere: Mapantsula (1988)

  • Chapter
South Africa’s Renegade Reels
  • 71 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter focuses on MAPANTSULA, (1988), an overtly antiapartheid engagé film about a petty gangster in the 1980s political unrest in South African townships. Central to the chapter’s exploration is the question of how Mapantsula relates to the public critical engagements on black identity and on the key preoccupation of the time, the antiapartheid struggle. It inquires into the publicness of Mapantsula—that is, the conditions of and tendencies in the public engagements of the film. The chapter critically builds on the approaches of Kluge and Hansen on the question of film and the public sphere, through its reflection on what I call the “public critical potency” of film. It attempts to develop a public sphere perspective on film scholarship, and to reassess the limits and possibilities that Kluge’s and Hansen’s reflections may bring to bear on how engagé films relate to the public sphere. Thus, in terms of form, production history, and circumstances of circulation, Mapantsula is significantly distinguishable from the previous films and allows a fresh perspective into the forms of publicness that different films may constitute. The chapter argues that their approaches labor with a conceptually restrictive understanding of the relationship between “film” and “public,” and ultimately underplay the “public critical potency” of film. Through Mapantsula, the chapter further argues that under certain circumstances, the public sphere of film can be more extensive and critical than Hansen’s and Kluge’s works suggest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. About the Tricameral Parliament and the political consternation it caused in South Africa, see Omar Ismail, Reform in Crisis: Why the Tricameral Parliament Failed (Johannesburg: Jonathan Ball, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  2. The cultural boycott came into being in the late 1950s as part of the antiapartheid movement strategy of calling for international sanctions against South Africa. For a brief historical discussion of the boycott, see Nomazengele A. Mangaliso, “Cultural Boycotts and Political Change” in Neta Crawford, and Audie Klots, eds., How Sanctions Work: Lessons from South Africa (Hampshire and London: Macmillan Press, 1999) 232–243.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Quest for Love (1988), directed by Helena Noguera, is according to film scholar, Martin Botha, “the first South African made film dealing with lesbianism and inter-racial sex”. See Botha, Marginal Lives and Painful Pasts: South African Cinema after Apartheid, (Parklands: Genugtig! Publishers, 2007) 68.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Many commentators share this view of the film’s authenticity. For example, the leftist magazine New Internationalist, contrasts the film against the “flawed but well intentioned” Cry Freedom and A World Apart. The magazine commended Mapantsula for filling the need to “dramatize the lives of black rather than white South Africans” (Online). Available at: http://www.newint.org/issue192/reviews.htm (accessed January 6, 2005). The review also appears in New Internationalist, ed. V. Baird, February 1989, 30. For a different take on the question of Mapantsula and authenticity, see Achmat Dangor, “Foreword”, in Oliver Schmitz and Thomas Mogotlane. Mapantsula: The Book: Screenplay and Interview (Fordsburg: COSAW, 1991) 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Litheko Modisane

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Modisane, L. (2013). Engagé Film and the Public Sphere: Mapantsula (1988). In: South Africa’s Renegade Reels. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137027030_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics