Abstract
This chapter focuses on MAPANTSULA, (1988), an overtly antiapartheid engagé film about a petty gangster in the 1980s political unrest in South African townships. Central to the chapter’s exploration is the question of how Mapantsula relates to the public critical engagements on black identity and on the key preoccupation of the time, the antiapartheid struggle. It inquires into the publicness of Mapantsula—that is, the conditions of and tendencies in the public engagements of the film. The chapter critically builds on the approaches of Kluge and Hansen on the question of film and the public sphere, through its reflection on what I call the “public critical potency” of film. It attempts to develop a public sphere perspective on film scholarship, and to reassess the limits and possibilities that Kluge’s and Hansen’s reflections may bring to bear on how engagé films relate to the public sphere. Thus, in terms of form, production history, and circumstances of circulation, Mapantsula is significantly distinguishable from the previous films and allows a fresh perspective into the forms of publicness that different films may constitute. The chapter argues that their approaches labor with a conceptually restrictive understanding of the relationship between “film” and “public,” and ultimately underplay the “public critical potency” of film. Through Mapantsula, the chapter further argues that under certain circumstances, the public sphere of film can be more extensive and critical than Hansen’s and Kluge’s works suggest.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
About the Tricameral Parliament and the political consternation it caused in South Africa, see Omar Ismail, Reform in Crisis: Why the Tricameral Parliament Failed (Johannesburg: Jonathan Ball, 1988).
The cultural boycott came into being in the late 1950s as part of the antiapartheid movement strategy of calling for international sanctions against South Africa. For a brief historical discussion of the boycott, see Nomazengele A. Mangaliso, “Cultural Boycotts and Political Change” in Neta Crawford, and Audie Klots, eds., How Sanctions Work: Lessons from South Africa (Hampshire and London: Macmillan Press, 1999) 232–243.
Quest for Love (1988), directed by Helena Noguera, is according to film scholar, Martin Botha, “the first South African made film dealing with lesbianism and inter-racial sex”. See Botha, Marginal Lives and Painful Pasts: South African Cinema after Apartheid, (Parklands: Genugtig! Publishers, 2007) 68.
Many commentators share this view of the film’s authenticity. For example, the leftist magazine New Internationalist, contrasts the film against the “flawed but well intentioned” Cry Freedom and A World Apart. The magazine commended Mapantsula for filling the need to “dramatize the lives of black rather than white South Africans” (Online). Available at: http://www.newint.org/issue192/reviews.htm (accessed January 6, 2005). The review also appears in New Internationalist, ed. V. Baird, February 1989, 30. For a different take on the question of Mapantsula and authenticity, see Achmat Dangor, “Foreword”, in Oliver Schmitz and Thomas Mogotlane. Mapantsula: The Book: Screenplay and Interview (Fordsburg: COSAW, 1991) 9–11.
Copyright information
© 2013 Litheko Modisane
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Modisane, L. (2013). Engagé Film and the Public Sphere: Mapantsula (1988). In: South Africa’s Renegade Reels. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137027030_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137027030_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43948-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-02703-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)