Abstract
We know from recent research that disabled children, their families and other allies are subjected to a whole host of responses from people, organizations and systems in society. What we perhaps know less about are the reasons why ‘the non-disabled’ or ‘normative’ imaginary responds to disability in terms of the often contradictory processes of fear/fascination; attraction/repulsion; recognition/extermination. Genetics, medicine and clinical psychology formally capture this ambivalent response to childhood disability — recruiting bodies and minds into the psycho-biological register in order to recognize them as disorders while, simultaneously, threatening to erase these bodies/minds as deficient kinds of humanity. Just as important are those informal moments that disabled people experience every day, in mundane and recurring encounters with what we might call the normative imaginary. In this chapter we want to explore this imaginary through the stories of disabled people. Adopting a social psychoanalytic account, we will consider the ways in which disability becomes wrapped up in responses of the non-disabled. We will make, employ and evaluate the concepts of the ‘uncanny’ and ‘disavowal’, and consider them in light of stories shared with one of us (Dan). Finally, we will conclude with some thoughts on cure, rehabilitation and therapy for the non-disabled — those poor souls caught up in the normative imaginary — albeit with tongue in cheek.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adelson, B.M. (2005) Lives of dwarfs: Their journey from public curiosity toward social liberation (Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press).
Allison, L. (2004) ‘Reading the Uncanny’, Review of The Uncanny by Nicholas Royle. (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005), The Cambridge Quarterly, 33, 3, 277–281.
Campbell, F.K. (2009) Contours of ableism: Territories, objects, disability and desire (London: Palgrave Macmillan).
Carlin, N. (2008) ‘The uncanny hospital ro:m: Psychoanalytic observations and recommendations for pastors and chaplains’, The Year 2008 Proceedings of the Association for the Scientific Study of Religion, South West, pp. 68–80.
Davis, L.J. (1995) Enforcing normalcy: Disability, deafness, and the body (New York: Verso).
Dolar, M. (1991) ‘“I shall be with you on your wedding-night”: Lacan and the uncanny’, October, 58: Rendering the Real, pp. 5–23.
Fanon, F. (1976) The wretched of the Earth, trans. Constance Farrington (London: Penguin).
Fanon, F. (1993) Black skins, white masks, 3rd edn (London: Pluto Press).
Freud, S. (1919) The uncanny, in J. Strachey (ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. xvii (London, 1919), pp. 219–252.
Garland Thomson, R. (ed.) (1996) Freakery: Cultural spectacles of the extraordinary body (New York: New York University Press).
Garland Thomson, R. (1997) Extraordinary bodies: Figuring physical disability in American literature and culture (New York: Columbia University Press).
Garland Thomson, R. (2005) ‘Feminist disability studies’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30, 2, 1557–1587.
Garland-Thomson, R. (2006) ‘Ways of staring’, Journal of Visual Culture, 5, 2, 173–192.
Goodley, D. (2011a) Disability Studies: An interdisciplinary introduction (London: Sage).
Goodley, D. (2011b) ‘Social psychoanalytic disability studies’, Disability and Society, 26, 6, 715–728.
Goodley, D. (2012) Paul Hunt + Lacan = Psychoanalytic disability studies, in D. Goodley, B. Hughes & L.J. Davis (eds), Disability and social theory (London: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 179–194.
Goodley, D. & Clough, P. (2004) ‘Community projects and excluded young people: Reflections on a participatory narrative research approach’, International Journal of Inclusive Education, 8, 4, 331–351.
Goodley, D. & Runswick-Cole, K. (2012) ‘The body as disability and possability: Theorising the “leaking, lacking and excessive” bodies of disabled children’, Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 15, 1, 1–19.
Hewitt, S, (2004) Sticks and stones in a boy, in B. Guter & J. Killacky (eds), Queer crips: Disabled gay men and their stories (New York: Haworth Press), pp. 117–120.
Hook, D. (2004) Fanon and the psychoanalysis of racism, in D. Hook (ed.), Critical psychology (Lansdowne, South Africa: Juta Academic Publishing), pp. 114–137.
Hughes, B. (1999) ‘The constitution of impairment: Modernity and the aesthetic of oppression’, Disability & Society, 14, 2, 155–172.
Lurie, S. (2004) Loving you, loving me, in B. Guter & J. Killacky (eds), Queer crips: Disabled gay men and their stories (New York: Haworth Press), pp. 83–86.
Malec, C. (1993). ‘The double objectification of disability and gender’, Canadian Woman Studies, 13, 4, 22–23.
Mallett, R. & Runswick-Cole, K. (2012) Commodifying autism: The cultural contexts of ‘Disability’ in the academy, in D. Goodley, B. Hughes & L.J. Davis (eds), Disability and social theory (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 33–41.
Marks, D. (2002) ‘Some concluding notes — healing the split between psyche and social: Constructions and experiences of disability’, Disability Studies Quarterly, 22, 3, 46–62.
McGuire, A. (2011) Representing autism: A critical examination of autism advocacy in the neoliberal West, Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Toronto.
McLaughlin, J., Goodley, D., Clavering, E. & Fisher, P. (2008) Families raising disabled children: Enabling care and social justice (London: Palgrave).
Masschelein, A. (2003) A homeless concept: Shapes of the uncanny in twentieth-century theory and culture, Issue 5, Image and Narrative, Online Magazine of the Visual Narrative. http://www.imageandnarrative.be/inarchive/uncanny/anneleenmasschelein.htm [accessed 2 December 2012].
Michalko, R. (2002) The difference that disability makes (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press).
Mitchell, D. & Snyder, S. (2006) Narrative prosthesis and the materiality of metaphor, in L. Davis (ed.), The Disability Studies reader, 2nd edn (New York: Routledge).
Parker, I. (1997) Psychoanalytic culture (London: Sage).
Reeve, D. (2005) Towards a psychology of disability: The emotional effects of living in a disabling society, in D. Goodley & R. Lawthom (eds), Disability and psychology: Critical introductions and reflections (London: Palgrave), pp. 94–108.
Reeve, D. (2008) Negotiating disability in everyday life: The experience of psycho-emotional disablism, Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Lancaster.
Seppanen, J. (2011) ‘Lost at sea: The Freudian uncanny and representing ecological degradation’, Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, 16, 2, 196–208.
Snyder, S.L. and Mitchell, D.T. (2006). Cultural locations of disability. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Thomas, C. (1999) Female forms: Experiencing and understanding disability (Buckingham: The Open University Press).
Thomas, C. (2007) Sociologies of disability, ‘impairment’, and chronic illness: Ideas in disability studies and medical sociology (London: Palgrave).
United Spinal Association (2008) Disability etiquette: Tips on interacting with people with disabilities, United Spinal Association, 75–20 Astoria Boulevard, Jackson Heights, NY, 11370–1177. http//:www.unitedspinal.org [accessed 3 December 2012].
Wendell, S. (1989) ‘Toward a feminist theory of disability’, Hypatia, Special Issue: Feminist Ethics and Medicine, 4, 2, 104–124.
Wendell, S. (1996) The rejected body: Feminist philosophical reflections on disability (New York: Routledge).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Dan Goodley and Rebecca Lawthom
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Goodley, D., Lawthom, R. (2013). The Disavowal of Uncanny Disabled Children: Why Non-Disabled People Are So Messed Up Around Childhood Disability. In: Curran, T., Runswick-Cole, K. (eds) Disabled Children’s Childhood Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137008220_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137008220_13
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43555-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-00822-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)