Skip to main content

The Present and Future of Work-Family Decision Making

  • Chapter
Expanding the Boundaries of Work-Family Research

Abstract

The systematic empirical study of judgement and decision making began to emerge as a discipline in its own right only in the 1960s. This occurred together with a strong surge of interest in the larger, more general field of cognitive psychology, which also includes the study of memory, thinking, problem solving, mental imagery and language (Arkes & Hammond, 1986). Decision making has been defined as “the mental processes (cognitive process) resulting in the selection of a course of action among several alternatives” (“Decision-making”, 2011, para. 2). The seminal work of Herbert Simon and James March (March, 1994; March & Simon, 1958; Simon, 1947, 1976) has propelled decision making into a broadly studied concept in the organizational behaviour and general management literature and has given rise to a separate academic discipline (behavioural decision science) and specialized journals (e.g., Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes). Nevertheless, studies linking decision making with the work—family interface were a relatively new phenomenon in 2005, the year in which the first International Conference of Work and Family (ICWF) was held. The absence of a decision-making perspective in the work—family literature is surprising in light of Kahn et al.’s (1964) well-established definition of inter-role conflict as a process by which individuals decide whether to comply with the demands of a particular role at a given point in time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arkes, H. R., & Hammond, K. R. (eds). (1986). Judgment and Decision Making: An Interdisciplinary Reader. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., & Fugate, M. (2000). All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 25, 472–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H Freeman & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechara, A., & Damasio, A. R. (2005). The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision. Games and Economic Behavior, 52, 336–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau. P. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boston College Center for Work and Family. (2000). Measuring the Impact of Workplace Flexibility. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College Center for Work and Family.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byron, K. (2005). A meta-analytic review of work-family conflict and its antecedents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 169–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., & Greenberg, J. (1997). Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze. In: C. L. Cooper & I. Robertson (eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 317–372). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Grosset/Putnam.

    Google Scholar 

  • den Dulk, L. (2005). Managerial attitudes and decision-making regarding work-life policies in the European workplace: explorations for future research. Paper presented at the International Conference of Work and Family, July 2005, Barcelona, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • den Dulk, L., & de Ruijter, J. (2005). Explaining managerial attitudes towards the use of work-life policies in the UK and the Netherlands. Paper presented at the International Conference of Community, Work and Family, March 2005, Manchester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • den Dulk, L., & de Ruijter, J. (2009). Managing work-life policies: Disruption versus dependency arguments: Explaining managerial attitudes towards employee utilization of work-life policies. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19, 1222–1236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, S. C. (2003). If you can use them: Flexibility policies, organizational commitment, and perceived performance. Industrial Relations, 42, 145–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. R., & Rothbard, N. P. (2000). Mechanisms linking work and family: Clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs. Academy of Management Review, 25, 178–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epie, C. (2005). Work-family decision making and the subjective experience of conflict among Nigerian managers. Paper presented at the International Conference of Work and Family, July 2005, Barcelona, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried, M. (1999). Parental leave policy and corporate culture. Women and Work, 1, 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frone, M. R., & Yardley, J. K. (1996). Workplace family supportive programmes: Predictors of employed parents’ importance ratings. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69, 351–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodstein, J. D. (1994). Institutional pressures and strategic responsiveness: Employer involvement in work-family issues. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 350–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1996). The Quest for Justice on the Job: Essays and Experiments. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10, 76–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2003). When work and family collide: Deciding between competing role demands. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90, 291–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31, 72–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2007). A conceptual analysis of decision making at the work-family interface. Paper presented at the International Conference of Work and Family, July 2007, Barcelona, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2009). Sex, gender, and the family → work interface: A decision-making perspective. Paper presented at the International Conference of Work and Family, July 2009, Barcelona, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, L. B., Kossek, E. E., Zimmerman, K., & Daniels, R. (2007). Clarifying the construct of family-supportive supervisory behaviors (FSSB): A multilevel perspective. In: P. L. Perrewé & D. C. Ganster (eds.), Research in Occupational Stress and Well Being (Vol. 6, pp. 165–204). Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, A. (1992). Work and family crossroads spanning the career. In: S. Zedeck (ed.), Work, Families and Organizations (pp. 70–137). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, P., & Simons, T. (1995). Institutional and resource dependence determinants of responsiveness to work-family issues. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1466–1482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I. L., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, R. L., Wolfe, D. M., Quinn, R. P., Snoek, J. D., & Rosenthal, R. A. (1964). Organizational Stress: Studies in Role Conflict and Ambiguity. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, K. J., Berman, L. M., & Dickson, M. W. (2000). May I work part-time? An exploration of predicted employer responses to employee request for part-time work. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57, 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kossek, E. E., Noe, R. A., & DeMarr, B. J. (1999). Work-family role synthesis: Individual and organizational determinants. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 10, 102–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, S. J. (1990). Processes linking work and family: A critical review and research agenda. Human Relations, 4, 239–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Languilaire, J. C. (2005). Middle-managers’ work/non-work relationships. Paper presented at the International Conference of Work and Family, July 2005, Barcelona, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Languilaire, J. C. (2007). Segmentation and integration of work and personal life: how do French middle-mangers make choices? Paper presented at the International Conference of Work and Family, July 2007, Barcelona, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, S. R., & Hammond, S. C. (2005). The complexification of work-family conflict theory: A critical analyses. Tamara Journal, 4, 151–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1994). A Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masuda, A. (2007). Choosing and pursuing multiple family and work goals: Does prioritizing work or family goals influences well being? Paper presented at the International Conference of Work and Family, July 2007. Barcelona. Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nippert-Eng, C. E. (1996). Home and Work: Negotiating Boundaries Through Everyday Life. Chicago & London: The University Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Osterman, P. (1995). Work/family programs and the employment relationship. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 681–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papi Gálvez, N. (2005). Individual work-family decisions in an incompatible context of production: newspapers and women journalist in Eastern Spain. Paper presented at the International Conference of Work and Family, July 2005, Barcelona, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlow, L. A. (1998). Boundary control: The social ordering of work and family time in a high-tech corporation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 328–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, P., & den Dulk, L. (2003). Cross-cultural differences in managers’ support for home-based telework: A theoretical elaboration. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 3, 329–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poelmans, S. A. Y. (2005). The decision process theory of work and family. In: E. E. Kossek & S. J. Lambert (eds.), Work and Life Integration: Organizational, Cultural, and Individual Perspectives (pp. 263–285). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poelmans, S., & Beham, B. (2007). The moment of truth: Conceptualizing managerial work—life policy allowance decisions. Paper presented at the International Conference of Work & Family, Barcelona, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poelmans, S., & Beham, B. (2008). The moment of truth: Conceptualizing managerial work—life policy allowance decisions. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81, 393–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poelmans, S. A. Y., Odle-Dusseau, H. N., & Beham, B. (2008). Work—life balance: Individual and organizational strategies and practices. In: S. Cartwright & C. L. Cooper (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Well Being (pp. 180–213). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poelmans, S., & Sahibzada, K. (2004). A multi-level model for studying the context and impact of work/family policies and culture in organizations. Human Resource Management Review, 14, 409–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. N., & Greenhaus, J. H. (2006). Managing incidents of work—family conflict: A decision-making perspective. Human Relations, 59, 1179–1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. N., & Greenhaus, J. H. (2009). Sex, gender, and the family → work interface: a decision-making perspective. Paper presented at the International Conference of Work and Family, July 2007, Barcelona, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. N., & Greenhaus, J. H. (2010). Sex, gender, and the work-to-family interface: Exploring negative and positive interdependencies. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 513–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. N., & Mainiero, L. A. (1999). Managerial decision making regarding alternative work arrangements. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quijada, M. A. (2005). Facilitating the cognitive shift to manage flexible schedule: what successful organizations do? Paper presented at the International Conference of Work and Family, July 2005, Barcelona, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M., & McLean Parks, J. (1993). The contracts of individuals and organizations. In: L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (pp. 1–47). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saavedra, R., Earley, P. C., & Van Dyne, L. (1993). Complex interdependence in task-performing groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, P., & Srb, J. H. (1979). Flexitime, Where, When, and How? Ithaca, New York: School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). Goal striving, need satisfaction, and longitudinal well-being: The self concordance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 482–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1947). Administrative Behavior. A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Behavior, Introduction. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1976). Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Behavior, 3rd ed. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. C., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 2nd ed. (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoits, P. A. (1991). On merging identity theory and stress research. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. A., Beauvais, L. L., & Lyness, K. S. (1999). When work-family benefits are not enough: The influence of work-family culture on benefit utilization, organizational attachment, and work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54, 392–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. A., Poelmans, S. A. Y., Allen, T. D., & Andreassi, J. K. (2007). On the importance of coping: A model and new directions for research on work and family. In: P. L. Perrewé & D. C. Ganster (eds.), Exploring the Work and Non-Work Interface, Research in Occupational Stress and Well Being (Vol. 6, pp. 73–113). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211 (4481), 453–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenis, E. (2000). “Als Het Bedrijf Er Maar Niet Teveel Last Van Heeft”. De Invloed Van Het Ouderschapsbeleid En De Ouderschapscultuur Op De Combinatieproblemen Van Mannelijk En Vrouwelijke Werknemers Met Jonge Kinderen in Supermarkten En Boekhandels. Pasmans: The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitener, E. M., Brodt, S. E., Korsgaard, M. A., & Werner, J. M. (1998). Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behaviour. Academy of Management Review, 23, 513–530.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Steven Poelmans, Jeffrey H. Greenhaus and Olena Stepanova

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Poelmans, S., Greenhaus, J.H., Stepanova, O. (2013). The Present and Future of Work-Family Decision Making. In: Poelmans, S., Greenhaus, J.H., Maestro, M.L.H. (eds) Expanding the Boundaries of Work-Family Research. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137006004_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics