Skip to main content

‘To Know as We Are Known’: Locating an Ancient Alternative to Virtues

  • Chapter
Wise Management in Organisational Complexity
  • 274 Accesses

Abstract

In After Virtue, Alasdair MacIntyre argues that a single moral tradition shaped ethical reasoning from Aristotle until the Enlightenment after which it became fragmented in service of individualism and ultimately ‘emotivism’ (2007, pp. 6–35).1 Notwithstanding the diversity of the writers and contexts that influenced it, MacIntyre believes this tradition — epitomised and canonised in Aristotle — shared a stable sense of ‘a cosmic order which dictates the place of each virtue in a total harmonious scheme of human life’ (2007, p. 142). Linking this cosmic order and the Aristotelian system of virtues were ‘background concepts of the narrative unity of human life’ (228). According to MacIntyre, this narrative gave stable meaning to the virtues for the better part of two millennia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agamben, G. (2005). The Time That Remains: A Commentary on the Letter to the Romans. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (1960). Posterior Analytics. Topica. Leob Classical Library, 391, trans. H. Tredennick and E. Foster. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (1966). Ethics (Nicomachean), trans. J. Thomson. Penguin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asad, T. (2003). Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badiou, A. (2003). Saint Paul: The Foundation of Universalism. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, W. (1979). A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, 2nd edn, ed. W. Arndt and F. Gingrich. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, R. (2002). ‘The Protestant Structure of American Culture: Multiculture or Monoculture?’ The Hedgehog Review, 4(1): 7–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, B. (2008). ‘The Economies of Love and Knowledge in Paul’. In N. Wirzba and B. Benson (eds), Transforming Philosophy and Religion: Love’s Wisdom, pp. 28–41. Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, R. (1992). ‘Wicked Problems in Design Thinking’. Design Issues, 8(2): 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casanova, J. (2006). ‘Rethinking Secularization: A Global Comparative Perspective’. The Hedgehog Review, 8(1): 7–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. (1993). Secular and Christian Leadership in Corinth: A Socio-historical and Exegetical Study of1 Corinthians 1–6. E. J. Brill, Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, C. (2003). Christianity and Classical Culture: A Study of Thought and Action from Augustus to Augustine. Amagi, Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. (2005). The Triumph of Numbers: How Counting Shaped Modern Life. W.W. Norton & Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, W. (2005). ‘White Noise’. The Hedgehog Review, 7(2): 26–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creel, R. (2001). Thinking Philosophically: An Introduction to Critical Reflection and Rational Dialogue. Blackwell, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, J. (2011). Humilitas: A Lost Key to Life, Love, and Leadership. Zondervan, Grand Rapids.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, C. (1986). ‘Comparison, Self-praise and Irony: Paul’s Boasting and Conventions in Hellenistic Rhetoric’. New Testament Studies, 32: 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franz, D. (2009). ‘Pillar, Ledger, and Mission: Ontologies of the American Corporation’. The Hedgehog Review, 11(2): 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gempf, C. (1993). ‘Public Speaking and Published Accounts’. In B. Winter and A. Clarke (eds), The Book of Acts in Its First Century Setting: Vol 1. Ancient Literary Setting, pp. 259–303. Eerdmans, Grand Rapids.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golsby-Smith, T. (1996). ‘Fourth Order Design: A Practical Perspective’. Design Issues, 12(1): 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, A. (2000). The Dream of Reason: A History of Philosophy from the Greeks to the Renaissance. Allen Lane, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grene, M. (1974). The Knower and the Known. University of California Press, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J. (2003). Paul’s Language of Grace in its Graeco-Roman Context. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2, Reihe 172. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J. (ed.) (2008). E.A. Judge: The First Christians in the Roman World: Augustan and New Testament Essays. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillard, T. (2008). ‘Augustus and the Evolution of Roman Concepts of Leadership’. In J. Beness (ed.), Studies in Honour of Margaret Parker, II, pp. 107–52. Macquarie Ancient History Association, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horsley, G. (ed.) (1981–89). New Documents Illustrating Early Christianity, vols I–V. Macquarie University Press, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horsley, R. (ed.) (1997). Paul and Empire: Religion and Power in Roman Imperial Society. Trinity Press, Harrisburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horsley, R. (ed.) (2000). Paul and Politics: Ekklesia, Israel, Imperium, Interpretation. Trinity Press, Harrisburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illouz, E. (2010). ‘Love and Its Discontents: Irony, Reason, Romance’. The Hedgehog Review, 12(1): 18–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, E. (1972). ‘St Paul and Classical Society’. Jahrbuch fur Antiqiuty und Christentum, 15: 19–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, E. (1975). ‘St. Paul as a Radical Critic of Society’. Interchange, 16: 191–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, E. (1982). Rank and Status in the World of the Caesars and St. Paul. The Broadhead Memorial Lecture, 1981. University of Canterbury Press, Christchurch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, E. (1983). ‘Christian Innovation and Its Contemporary Observers’. In B. Croke and A. Emmett (eds), History and Historians in Late Antiquity, pp. 13–29. Pergamon, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, E. (1984). ‘Cultural Conformity and Innovation in Paul: Some Clues from Contemporary Documents’. Tyndale Bulletin 35: 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, E. (1993). ‘Ancient Beginnings of the Modern World’. Ancient History, 23(3): 125–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahane, A. (2010). Power and Love: A Theory and Practice of Social Change. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lategan, B. (1990). ‘Is Paul Developing a Specifically Christian Ethics in Galatians?’ In D. Balch, E. Ferguson and W. Meeks (eds), Greeks, Romans, and Christians: Essays in Honour of Abraham J. Malherbe, pp. 318–28. Fortress, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (2007). After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malherbe, A. (1986). Moral Exhortation: A Greco-Roman Sourcebook. Library of Early Christianity, 4. Westminster, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, P. (1987). Enmity in Corinth: Social Conventions in Paul’s Relations with the Corinthians. J.C.B. Mohr, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plutarch (1928). Moralia I–II, trans. F. Babbitt, Loeb Classical Library, 222. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-critical Philosophy. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. Doubleday, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saul, J.R. (1993). Voltaire’s Bastards: The Dictatorship of Reason in the West. Penguin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saul, J.R. (2001). On Equilibrium. Penguin, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharmer, O. (2009). Theory U: Leading from the Future as It Emerges. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholer, D.M. (ed.) (2008). Social Distinctives of the Christians in the First Century: Pivotal Essays by E.A. Judge. Hendrickson, Peabody.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seneca (1928–35). Epistulae Morales. I–III, Leob Classical Library. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1992). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Random House, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P., O. Scharmer, J. Jaworski and B. Flowers (2004). Presence: Exploring Profound Change in People, Organizations and Society. Nicholas Brealey, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowers, S. (1990). ‘Paul on the Use and Abuse of Reason’. In D. Balch, E. Ferguson and W. Meeks (eds), Greeks, Romans, and Christians: Essays in Honour of Abraham J. Malherbe, pp. 253–86. Fortress, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strom, M. (2001). Reframing Paul: Conversations in Grace and Community. IVP, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strom, M. (2003). ‘Humility’. In C. Baker (ed.), The Seven Heavenly Virtues of Leadership, pp. 3–15. McGraw-Hill, Brisbane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strom, M. (2007). Arts of the Wise Leader. Sophos, Auckland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strom, M. (2011). ‘From Promised Land to Reconciled Cosmos: Paul’s Translation of “Worldview,” “Worldstory” and “Worldperson.”’ In P. Church, T. Bulkeley, T. Meadowcroft and P. Walker (eds), The Gospel and the Land of Promise: Christian Approaches to the Land of the Bible, pp. 14–27. Pickwick, Eugene, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taubes, J. (2004). The Political Theology of Paul. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, G. (1981). ‘The Poverty of Problem Solving’. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 8: 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, H. (2002). ‘Authority and Grace: A Response to Robert Bellah’. The Hedgehog Review, 4(1): 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, S. (1991). Sustaining Affirmation: The Strengths of Weak Ontology in Political Theory. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, B. (2001). Philo and Paul among the Sophists: Alexandrian and Corinthian Responses to a Julio-Claudian Movement. Eerdmans, Grand Rapids.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, B. (2003). Roman Wives, Roman Widows: The Appearance of New Roman Women and the Pauline Communities. Eerdmans, Grand Rapids.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirzba, N., and B. Benson (2008). ‘Introduction’. In N. Wirzba and B. Benson (eds), Transforming Philosophy and Religion: Love’s Wisdom, pp. 1–11. Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Mark Strom

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Strom, M. (2013). ‘To Know as We Are Known’: Locating an Ancient Alternative to Virtues. In: Thompson, M.J., Bevan, D. (eds) Wise Management in Organisational Complexity. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137002655_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics