Skip to main content

The Dynamics of Collective Agency in Practice: Women’s Fight against FGM in Upper Egypt

  • Chapter
The Capability Approach

Abstract

The poor suffer from various restrictions on their individual capabilities, such as unequal power relations, gender rules, social norms, unresponsive institutional structures, ineffective legal systems and inefficient government services. To overcome such limitations, the poor use their collective agency to achieve and expand their capabilities. To operationalise the capability approach, this chapter uses the case study of anti-female genital mutilation (FGM) women groups in Egypt to explore what it means to exercise collective human agency and how freedoms and capabilities can be expanded in practise. It sheds light on the different aspects and phases of the collective agency process as well as the different motives and challenges encountered in this process. Agency and freedom are two central concepts in the capability approach; this chapter seeks to explore how these two concepts can be applied in practise through the example of anti-FGM groups. These women agents suffered from inequality and gender-based discrimination as a result of the practise of FGM in their villages. The existing social norm was not only restrictive and abusive to their reproductive health rights, but also violated their body’s integrity and restricted their individual capabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alkire, S. (2005) ‘Why the Capability Approach’, Journal of Human Development, 6 (1), pp. 115–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A. (2004) ‘The Capacity to Aspire: Culture and the Terms of Recognition’, in V. Rao and M. Walton (eds), Culture and Public Action, The World Bank, Washington, DC, pp. 59–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolbol, L. (2005) Girls At Risk: A Research on FGM in Villages East of the Nile in Menia, Better Life Association for Comprehensive Development, Menia. Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deneulin, S. (2004) ‘Freedom and the Common Good: Which Individual Agency for Development?’ Paper presented at 4th International Conference on the Capability Approach: Enhancing Human Security, Pavia, Italy, 5–7 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deneulin, S. and Stewart, F. (2001) ‘A Capability Approach for Individuals Living Together’. Paper presented at the Conference Justice and Poverty: Examining Sen’s Capability Approach, Cambridge, 5–7 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970) Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Herder and Herder, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (2000) Education of Critical Consciousness, Continuum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, S. (2008) ‘Collective Agency: Wider Freedoms and New Capabilities through Self-help’, in Jean Luc Dubois et al. (eds) Repenser L’Action Collective: une Approche par les Capabilitiés [Rethinking Collective Action through a Capabilities Approach], Réseau IMPACT Network, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Special Advisor on Gender Issues and Advancement of Women (OSAGI) (2006) ‘Egypt: Empowering Women’s Participation in Community and Household Decision-making in Water and Sanitation’, in Gender, Water and Sanitation: Case Studies on Best Practices. Office of the Special Advisor on Gender Issues and Advancement of Women, United Nations, New York. http://www.genderandwater.org/page/5687 (Accessed 5 April 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K. (1970) Collective Choice and Social Welfare, Holden Day, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1984) ‘The Living Standard’, Oxford Economic Papers, Supplement 36, pp. 74–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1985) ‘Well-Being, Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984’, Journal of Philosophy, 82(4), pp. 169–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1992) Inequality Reexamined, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1999) Development as Freedom, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2002) Poverty Reduction in Egypt: Diagnosis and Strategy, World Bank, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2009) Arab Republic of Egypt: Upper Egypt: Pathways to Shared Growth, World Bank, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yount, K. M. (2002) ‘Like Mother, Like Daughter? Female Genital Cutting in Minia, Egypt’, Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43 (3), pp. 336–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Solava Ibrahim

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ibrahim, S. (2014). The Dynamics of Collective Agency in Practice: Women’s Fight against FGM in Upper Egypt. In: Ibrahim, S., Tiwari, M. (eds) The Capability Approach. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137001436_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics