Skip to main content

Conclusion

  • Chapter
US-Grenada Relations
  • 107 Accesses

Abstract

It is no exaggeration to say that without Eric Gairy there would have been no “revolution” in 1979. The 1970s saw the political awakening and subsequent enfranchisement of Grenada’s youth, particularly influenced by the Black Power movement. Out of this emerged the New Jewel Movement (NJM) whose ability to forge a cross-class coalition of support made it a serious threat to Gairy; as Brizan concludes, “He [Gairy] never, in fact, understood the type of opposition he was up against.”1 The result was the traditional response of violence and intimidation: the events of “Bloody Sunday” in November 1973 alienated many people, especially the younger generation, and the fraudulent election victory in 1976 reinforced the NJM’s belief that Gairy would never willingly relinquish the reigns of power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. George Brizan, Grenada: Island of Conflict (London: Macmillan, 1998), 378.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kai Schoenhals and Richard Melanson, Revolution and Intervention in Grenada: The New Jewel Movement, the United States and the Caribbean (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1985), 34.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Robert Pastor, National Security Council, secret memorandum, “Subject: Mini-SCC Meeting on Grenada,” March 14, 1979, no. 1629, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Frank Ortiz, Confidential telegram to US Department of State, Washington D.C., “Subject: Grenada: Prime Minister Bishop Accuses U.S. of Destabilization Program,” 101256Z, May 10, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. W. Brands, Jr., “Decisions on American Armed Intervention: Lebanon, Dominican Republic, and Grenada,” Political Science Quarterly 102 (1987): 620. In November 1979, 53 US embassy staff in Tehran were taken hostage by Iranian militants. After diplomatic efforts and economic sanctions were unsuccessful, President Carter approved a military operation to rescue the hostages. The mission ended prematurely in the Iranian desert when two helicopters suffered mechanical malfunctions and a third one crashed killing eight Americans. The crisis effectively destroyed Carter’s reelection chances; the hostages were eventually released the day Carter left office after 444 days in captivity. See David Houghton, US Foreign Policy and the Iran Hostage Crisis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Christopher Hemmer, “Historical Analogies and the Definition of Interests: The Iranian Hostage Crisis and Ronald Reagan’s Policy toward the Hostages in Lebanon,” Political Psychology 20, no. 2 (1999): 271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Milan Bish, confidential telegram to secretary of state, “Subject: Current Situation,” undated [c. October 15, 1983], 1.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Langhorne Motley, “The Decision to Assist Grenada,” Department of State Bulletin 84 (March 1984), 71.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Milan Bish, secret telegram to secretary of state, “Subject: Grenada: Ambassador’s Assessment of the Situation on Grenada,” 200749Z, October 1983, Bridgetown 06393, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mark Adkin, Urgent Fury: The Battle for Grenada (London: Leo Cooper, 1989), 108.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gregory Sandford and Richard Vigilante, Grenada: The Untold Story (New York: Madison Books, 1984), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Richard Halloran, “Joint Chiefs Supported U.S. Action as Feasible,” New York Times, October 27, 1983, 23.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See John McQuiston, “School’s Chancellor Says Invasion Was Not Necessary to Save Lives,” New York Times, October 26, 1983;

    Google Scholar 

  14. Robert Pastor, “Outrage Follows Outrage,” Washington Post, October 26, 1983;

    Google Scholar 

  15. and John Quigley, “The United States Invasion of Grenada: Stranger Than Fiction,” University of Miami Inter-American Law Review 18, no. 4 (Winter 1986–1987): 271–305.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See Bernard Gwertzman, “Fear of ‘Another Iran’ Haunted the White House,” New York Times, October 26, 1983;

    Google Scholar 

  17. and Robert Toth, “U.S. Feared 2nd Hostage Crisis: Shultz,” Los Angeles Times, October 26, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Robert Beck, The Grenada Invasion: Politics, Law, and Foreign Policy Decisionmaking (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993), 202.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See Abraham Lowenthal, Exporting Democracy: The United States and Latin America (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991);

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mark Peceny, Democracy at the Point of Bayonets (University Park: Pennsylvania State University, 1999);

    Google Scholar 

  21. and Tony Smith, America’s Mission: The United States and the Worldwide Struggle for Democracy in the Twentieth Century (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tom Adams, “Speech by the Prime Minister of Barbados to Barbadian Parliament, 15/11/83,” in UK Parliament, House of Commons, Foreign Affairs Committee, Second Report, Grenada, Session 1983–84 (London: HMSO, 1984), lv.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Leslie Manigat, “Revolutionary Shockwave, Crisis and Intervention,” in The Caribbean and World Politics: Cross Currents and Cleavages, ed. Jorge Heine and Leslie Manigat (New York: Holmes and Meier, 1988), 187.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Holly Sklar, Washington’s War on Nicaragua (Boston: South End Press, 1985), 174.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Richard Haass, Intervention: Use of American Military Force in the Post-Cold War World (Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1999), 154.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2007 Gary Williams

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Williams, G. (2007). Conclusion. In: US-Grenada Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230609952_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230609952_9

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-53456-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-60995-2

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics