Skip to main content

Not in Anybody’s Backyard: The Carter Years

  • Chapter
US-Grenada Relations
  • 111 Accesses

Abstract

At 4:00 p.m. on March 12, 1979, the New Jewel Movement’s (NJM) Security and Defence Committee consisting of Bishop, Coard, Whiteman, and Hudson Austin secretly met to discuss “Operation Apple,” the contingency plan to topple Gairy that had been in preparation for four years.1 The vote was split, with Bishop and Whiteman against action at that time. Another NJM member, George Louison, was brought in to break the deadlock: he voted in favor of action.2 There was a certain sense of “now or never” about the choice; Bishop later explained that it was a case of “them or us … and we didn’t plan on it being us.”3 The main target was the army barracks at True Blue in the south. Apart from the advantage of surprise, the NJM was unsure of what the reaction would be; it had to trust that the populace would support it; that Gairy’s supporters would not fight; and, most importantly, that the police and army would not provide any significant resistance.4 Gairy’s absence meant one key target was removed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Brian Meeks, Caribbean Revolutions and Revolutionary Theory: An Assessment of Cuba, Nicaragua and Grenada (London: Macmillan, 1993), 155.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Manning Marable, African and Caribbean Politics: From Kwame Nkrumah to the Grenada Revolution (London: Verso, 1987), 221.

    Google Scholar 

  3. David Lewis, Reform and Revolution in Grenada: 1950 to 1981 (Habana: Casa De Las Americas, 1984), 151. As a UK report later concluded: “Special branch had been effectively infiltrated by the NJM. Promotion had long been decided by political favouritism rather than merit… The defence force was similarly inadequate. Poorly equipped and trained with part-time officers, it was a rival rather than an effective back-up for the police force with whom there was no effective liaison.” No author, Mexico and Caribbean Department, Foreign and Commonwealth Office, “Anglo-US-Canadian Talks on Security in the Caribbean, Brief No. 5, Assistance to Enhance Security, Including Police, Intelligence and Possibly Regional Coastguard,” April 30, 1979, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Maurice Bishop, “A Bright New Dawn, March 13, 1979,” in Maurice Bishop Speaks: The Grenada Revolution and Its Overthrow 1979–83, ed. Bruce Marcus and Michael Taber (New York: Pathfinder, 1983), 25. Although the NJM referred to its victory as a “revolution,” it is often referred to as a coup. Marable suggests that the action was “not a genuine social revolution, but a political insurrection against a despotic and corrupt regime.” Marable, African and Caribbean Politics, 220. Meeks suggests that the NJM’s action was “a revolution from above, marginally distinguishable from a coup d’etat by its execution by armed irregulars and by the willingness of the leadership to mobilize popular support, though firmly under its command.” Meeks, Caribbean Revolutions and Revolutionary Theory, 156.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Robert Pastor, “Does the United States Push Revolutions to Cuba? The Case of Grenada,” Journal of Inter -American Studies and World Affairs 28, no. 1 (Spring 1986): 6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. John Goshko, “Caribbean Ministates are a New Source of Concern for U.S.,” Washington Post, July 6, 1979, A12.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Anthony Payne, Paul Sutton, and Tony Thorndike. Grenada: Revolution and Intervention (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1984), 89.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lawrence Rossin, United States-Grenada Relations since the Coup: A Background Paper (Bridgetown, Barbados: U.S. Embassy, 1983), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Frank Ortiz, “Letters to the Editor,” Atlantic Monthly 253 (June 1984): 9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Robert Gates, From the Shadows: The Ultimate Insider’s Story of Five Presidents and How They Won the Cold War (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1996), 143.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brian Hudson, “The Changing Caribbean: Grenada’s New International Airport,” Caribbean Geography 1, no. 1 (May 1983): 52.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hugh O’Shaughnessy, Grenada: Revolution, Invasion and Aftermath (London: Sphere Books, 1984), 88.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jay Mandle, Big Revolution, Small Country (Lanham, MD: North-South, 1985), 23.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Larry Rohter, “Grenada: A Tiny Exporter Of Revolution?” Newsweek, March 31, 1980, 44.

    Google Scholar 

  15. John Lent, “Mass Media and Socialist Governments in the Commonwealth Caribbean,” Human Rights Quarterly (1982): 387.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ricky Singh, “What Has Gone Wrong, Mr. Bishop?’” Caribbean Contact 7 (November 1979): 1.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Alister Hughes, “Straws in the Wind,” Caribbean Contact 7 (October 1979): 6.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Alister Hughes, “Strachan Explains Coca-Cola Take Over,” The Grenada Newsletter 7, no. 32 (October 27, 1979): 2.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Richard Hart, “Introduction,” in In Nobody’s Backyard: Maurice Bishop’s Speeches: 1979–1983 A Memorial Volume, ed. Chris Searle (London: Zed Books, 1984), xviii.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cynthia Mahabir, “Heavy Manners and Making Freedom under the People’s Revolutionary Government in Grenada, 1979–1983,” International Journal of the Sociology of Law 21 (1993): 225.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jenny Pearce, Under the Eagle: U.S. Intervention in Central America and the Caribbean (London: Latin America Bureau, 1982), 154.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Chris Searle, Grenada: The Struggle against Destabilization (London: Writers and Readers Publishing, 1983), 56.

    Google Scholar 

  23. H. Michael Erisman, “The CARICOM States and U.S. Foreign Policy: The Danger of Central Americanization,” Journal of Inter -American Studies and World Affairs$131, no. 3 (Fall 1989): 142.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Eudine Barriteau, “Regional Comments on Barbados-Grenada Relations,” Bulletin of Eastern Caribbean Affairs 6, no. 5 (November–December 1980): 23.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Anthony Maingot, “The United States in the Caribbean: Geopolitics and the Bargaining Capacity of Small States,” in Peace, Development and Security in the Caribbean, ed. Anthony Bryan, J. Edward Greene, and Timothy Shaw (London: Macmillan, 1990), 74.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Edward Herman and Frank Brodhead, Demonstration Elections: U.S.-Staged Elections in the Dominican Republic, Vietnam, and El Salvador (Boston: South End Press, 1986), 181.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2007 Gary Williams

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Williams, G. (2007). Not in Anybody’s Backyard: The Carter Years. In: US-Grenada Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230609952_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230609952_4

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-53456-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-60995-2

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics