Abstract
Our understanding of the concept of poverty has improved and deepened considerably in the last three decades or so following Amartya Sen’s seminal work. Presently we possess the analytical tools to identify and locate the poor, to describe their characteristics and to measure the extent of poverty at different levels of aggregation. Yet, in spite of spectacular methodological advances in the analysis of poverty a number of conceptual and measurement issues remains to be addressed or further clarified. Ravi Kanbur (2002) has argued that the research on distributional issues in economics and development economics in the last thirty years can be divided roughly into two periods: (i) the 1970s to the mid-1980s and (ii) the mid-1980s to the end of the last century. The first 15 years were a ‘period of great conceptual leaps and ferment’ while the second period was marked by ‘consolidation, application and fierce policy debate’. Very recent methodological contributions suggest that we are entering a period of resurgence in research attempting to sharpen and broaden our view of poverty.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkinson, A.B. and F. Bourguignon (1982) ‘The Comparison of MultiDimensional Distributions of Economic Status’, Review of Economic Studies, 49, 183–201.
Bourguignon, F. and S.R. Chakravarty (2003) ‘The Measurement of Multidimensional Poverty’, Journal of Economic Inequality, 1, 25–49.
Christiaensen, L. and R.N. Boisvert (2000) ‘Measuring Household Food Vulnerability: Case Evidence from Northern Mali’. Working Paper, Department of Agricultural, Resource, and Managerial Economics, Cornell University.
de Janvry, A. and E. Sadoulet (2005) ‘Designing Social Safety Net Programs to Directly Protect from Shocks the Assets of the Vulnerable’. Paper prepared for the World Bank/DFID Workshop on Growth and Risk, Leuven, June.
Dercon, S. (1996) ‘Risk, Crop Choice, and Savings: Evidence from Tanzania’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 44(3), 485–513.
Dercon, S. (2005a) ‘Risk, Growth and Poverty: What Do We Know, What Do We Need to Know’. Paper prepared for the World Bank/DFID Workshop on Growth and Risk, Leuven, June.
Dercon, S. (2005b) ‘Vulnerability: a Micro Perspective’. Paper presented at the ABCDE for Europe.
Duclos, J.-Y., D. Sahn and S. Younger (forthcoming) ‘Robust Multidimensional Poverty Comparisons’, Economic Journal.
Elbers, C. and J.W. Gunning (2003) ‘Estimating Vulnerability’, Department of Economics, Free University of Amsterdam.
Foster, J. J. Greer and E. Thorbecke (1984) ‘A Class of Decomposable Poverty Measures’, Econometrica, 52, 761–5.
Kanbur, R. (2002) ‘Conceptual Challenges in Poverty and Inequality: One Development Economist’s Perspective’, Working Paper 2002–09, Department of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University.
Kanbur, R. (ed.) (2003) Q-Squared: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods of Poverty Appraisal. Delhi: Permanent Black.
Ligon, E. and L. Schechter (2003) ‘Measuring Vulnerability’, Economic Journal, 113, 95–102.
Ravallion, M. and B. Bidani (1994) ‘How Robust is a Poverty Profile?’, World Bank Economic Review 8(1), 75–102.
Ravallion, M. (1998) Poverty Lines in Theory and Practice, Living Standard Measurement Study Working Paper 133. Washington DC: World Bank.
Streeten, P. First Things First: Meeting Basic Human Needs in Developing Countries. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tarp, F., K. Simler, C. Matusse, R. Heltberg, and C. Dava (2002) ‘The Robustness of Poverty Profiles Reconsidered’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 51(1) 77–106.
Thorbecke, E. (2003) ‘Tensions, Complementarities and Possible Convergence Between the Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches to Poverty Assessment’, In R. Kanbur (ed.), Q-Squared: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Poverty Appraisal. Delhi: Permanent Black.
Tsui, K.-Y. ‘Multidimensional Poverty Indices’, Social Choice and Welfare, 19, 69–93.
Wood, G. ‘Staying Secure, Staying Poor: the “Faustian Bargain”’, World Development, 31, 3.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thorbecke, E. (2013). Multidimensional Poverty: Conceptual and Measurement Issues. In: Kakwani, N., Silber, J. (eds) The Many Dimensions of Poverty. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592407_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592407_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28167-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59240-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)