Abstract
‘This argument is too structural. It’s under-determined and based on unrealistic assumptions. Moreover, it tells us little about how the world really works.’ Among many scholars – the present author included – this is an oft-heard set of complaints. Consider two examples. The central thesis of the democratic peace literature – that democracies do not fight other democracies – is hailed as one of the few law-like propositions in international relations. Yet, as critics rightly stress, we know amazingly little about the mechanisms generating such peaceful relations (Rosato 2003: 585–6, passim; Forum 2005; Hamberg 2005). And scholars have for years debated the identity-shaping effects of European institutions. One claim is that bureaucrats ‘go native’ in Brussels, adopting European values at the expense of national ones. Yet, here too, critics correctly note that we know virtually nothing about the process and mechanisms underlying these potentially transformative dynamics (Checkel 2005a,b).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2008 Jeffrey T. Checkel
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Checkel, J.T. (2008). Process Tracing. In: Klotz, A., Prakash, D. (eds) Qualitative Methods in International Relations. Research Methods Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230584129_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230584129_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-24175-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-58412-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)