Skip to main content

Fine Words, Few Answers: NATO’s ‘Not So New’ New Strategic Concept

  • Chapter
NATO beyond 9/11

Part of the book series: New Security Challenges ((NSECH))

  • 441 Accesses

Abstract

Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen told the Young Atlanticists on 19 November 2010 that NATO’s impending Lisbon Summit was one of the most important in the alliance’s history. It would, he pledged, see the adoption of ‘an ambitious new Strategic Concept that will launch an Alliance that will be more effective, more engaged, and more efficient’.1 This would be NATO’s third such document since the Cold War and the seventh in its history — but the first since the alliance’s post-9/11 transformation — and would provide the blueprint for the organization for the next ten years. In the event the Lisbon Summit went smoothly. Alliance leaders duly adopted to much fanfare a Strategic Concept designed to be the foundation for NATO 3.0, the third phase of the organization’s post-Cold War reinvention. At the same time progress was made on Afghanistan, the NATO-Russia relationship was energized and the alliance’s member states managed to avoid offering public evidence of disharmony.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Timo Noetzel and Benjamin Schreer, ‘Does a Multi-tier NATO Matter? The Atlantic Alliance and the Process of Strategic Change’, International Affairs, Vol. 85 (2), March 2009, pp. 211–26;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jakub M. Godzimirski, Nina Græger and Kristin M. Haugevik, ‘Towards a NATO à la Carte? Assessing the Alliance’s Adaptation to New Tasks and Changing Relationships’, Norwegian Institute of International Affairs 2010, available at: http://english.nupi.no/content/download/81114/273842/version/3/file/NUPI+Report-Gr%C3%A6ger+Godzimirdki-Haugevik.pdf, last accessed 22 June 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hew Strachan, ‘The Lost Meaning of Strategy’, Survival, Vol. 47 (3), 2005, pp. 33–54, at p. 34 and p. 48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Colin S. Gray, Modern Strategy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  5. An excellent example of Albright’s robust views about the needs for Western military intervention on both humanitarian and strategic grounds is her famous demand of Colin Powell during the outrages in Bosnia: ‘What’s the point of having this superb military that you’re always talking about if we can’t use it?’ Colin Powell, My American Journey (New York: Random House, 1995), p. 576.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Klaus Wittmann, ‘An Alliance for the 21st Century? Reviewing NATO’s New Strategic Concept’, in J. Ringsmose and S. Rynning (eds.), NATO’s New Strategic Concept: A Comprehensive Assessment, DIIS Report 2011:2, p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jamie Shea, ‘What does a New Strategic Concept do for NATO?’, in J. Ringsmose and S. Rynning (eds.), NATO’s New Strategic Concept: A Comprehensive Assessment, DIIS Report 2011:2, p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Damon Coletta and Sten Rynning, ‘NATO from Kabul to Earth Orbit’, Journal of Transatlantic Studies, 10, 2012, pp. 26–45 at p. 29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. David Yost, ‘NATO’s Evolving Purposes and the Next Strategic Concept’, International Affairs, 86 (2), 2010, pp. 489–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sven Biscop, ‘From Lisbon to Lisbon: Squaring the Circle of EU and NATO Future Role’, in J. Ringsmose and S. Rynning (eds.), NATO’s New Strategic Concept: A Comprehensive Assessment, DIIS Report 2011:2, p. 111.

    Google Scholar 

  11. For a contrary conclusion see Mark Webber, ‘Three Questions for the Strategic Concept’, in J. Ringsmose and S. Rynning (eds.), NATO’s New Strategic Concept: A Comprehensive Assessment, DIIS Report 2011, 2, pp. 99–105.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Steve Marsh and Alan P. Dobson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marsh, S., Dobson, A.P. (2013). Fine Words, Few Answers: NATO’s ‘Not So New’ New Strategic Concept. In: Hallams, E., Ratti, L., Zyla, B. (eds) NATO beyond 9/11. New Security Challenges. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230391222_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics