Skip to main content

‘Perennial Dilemmas’: NATO’s Post-9/11 Afghanistan ‘Crisis’

  • Chapter
NATO beyond 9/11

Part of the book series: New Security Challenges ((NSECH))

Abstract

When examining the implications of 9/11 for the alliance, it seems intuitively sensible to focus on the intervention in Afghanistan. By the end of 2014 NATO will have been involved, for over a decade, in one of the most complex, multifaceted conflicts it is possible to imagine. It has witnessed the deaths of thousands, including high numbers of troops from NATO states; the expenditure of billions of dollars; contributions, in one form or another, from virtually every NATO member; participation from a significant number of ‘partner’ countries; and deep political controversy within and between alliance members. Surely, it is reasonable to suppose that a detailed study of NATO’s exertions in Afghanistan will allow us to answer fundamental questions about how 9/11 has impacted on the alliance and on the future direction of NATO, and will also teach us compelling lessons regarding theoretical and policy approaches in international research on the alliance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See Thom Shanker and Steven Erlanger, ‘Blunt U.S. Warning Reveals Deep Strains in NATO’, New York Times, 10 June 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For good analyses of ‘transformation’ see Michael Gordon and Bernard Trainor, Cobra II (London: Atlantic Books, 2006);

    Google Scholar 

  3. Steven Metz, Iraq and the Evolution of American Strategy (Dulles, VA: Potomac Books, 2008);

    Google Scholar 

  4. Thomas Adams, The Army After Next (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Richard A. Clarke, Against All Enemies (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2004), p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Edgar Buckley, ‘Invocation of Article 5: five years on’, NATO Review, Summer 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  7. The most complete accounts of the CIA and Special Forces activities in Afghanistan in the initial intervention can be found in Gary Schroen, First In (New York: Presidio Press, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gary Berntsen, Jawbreaker: The Attack on bin Laden and Al Qaeda (New York: Three Rivers Press, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  9. For more detail on the campaign in the south and the east see Tim Bird and Alex Marshall, Afghanistan: How the West Lost Its Way (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2011), pp. 82–89.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See William Maley, Rescuing Afghanistan (London: Hurst & Co, 2006), p. 23

    Google Scholar 

  11. For a first-hand account of the Bonn Conference see James Dobbins, After the Taliban: Nation-Building in Afghanistan (Dulles, VA: Potomac Books, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  12. For a detailed examination of the Bush administration’s deliberations in the runup to the invasion of Iraq in 2003 see Bob Woodward, Plan of Attack (London: Pocket Books, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  13. See Toby Helm and Ben Fenton, ‘Germany and France warn Bush on Iraq’, The Daily Telegraph, 19 February 2002;

    Google Scholar 

  14. Steven Weisman, ‘US Set to Demand that Allies Agree Iraq is Defying UN’, The New York Times, 23 January 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Phrases included but were by no means restricted to ‘cheese-eating surrender-monkeys’ and the ‘axis of weasels’. For an indication of how all this was viewed in France see Nicole Mowbray, ‘Cheese-eating Monkeys and Gallic Merde’, The Observer, 16 February 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See Toby Helm and Toby Harnden, ‘American Fury as German Justice Minister Compares Bush to Hitler’, Daily Telegraph, 20 September 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See Elaine Sciolino, ‘Europe Assesses Damage to Western Relationships and Takes Steps to Rebuild’, The New York Times, 2 April 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  18. For a good overview of the effects on NATO and the wider intra-alliance issues see Terry Terriff, ‘Fear and Loathing in NATO: The Atlantic Alliance after the Crisis over Iraq’, Perspectives on European Politics and Society, Vol. 5 (3), September 2004, pp. 419–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. For detailed accounts of the political machinations see Philip Gordon and Jeremy Shapiro, Allies at War: America, Europe and the Crisis over Iraq (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2004);

    Google Scholar 

  20. Elizabeth Pond, Friendly Fire: the Near Death of the Transatlantic Alliance (Washington, DC: Brookings/EUSA, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  21. See Michael Gordon, ‘NATO Chief Says Alliance Needs Role in Afghanistan’, The New York Times, 21 February 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Craig Smith, ‘NATO Runs Short of Troops to Expand Afghan Peacekeeping’, The New York Times, 18 September 2004

    Google Scholar 

  23. See Judy Dempsey and David Cloud, ‘Europeans Balking at New Afghan Role’, The New York Times, 14 September 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  24. The 2007 figure comes from Pierre-Arnaud Chouvy, Opium: Uncovering the Politics of Poppy (London: I.B. Tauris, 2009), pp. xiii, 37–8. Total global opium production in 2006 was 6,610 tonnes.

    Google Scholar 

  25. The quote from General Sir David Richards appears in, James Fergusson, A Million Bullets (London: Bantam Press, 2008), p. 172.

    Google Scholar 

  26. See Julian Barnes, ‘US calls Iraq the priority’, Los Angeles Times, 12 December 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  27. David W. Barno, ‘Fighting “the other war”: Counterinsurgency strategy in Afghanistan, 2003–2005’, Military Review (September–October 2007), p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  28. The most comprehensive account of the debates within the Obama administration over Afghanistan can be found in, Bob Woodward, Obama’s Wars (London: Simon and Schuster, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Paul Rogers, Losing Control. Global Security in the Twenty-First Century, 3rd edition (London: Pluto Press, 2010), p. 173; and Duffield, Development, Security and Unending War.

    Google Scholar 

  30. See Timo Noetzel and Benjamin Schreer, ‘Counter-what? Germany and counterinsurgency in Afghanistan’, RUSI Journal, Vol. 153 (1), 2008, pp. 42–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. See Sten Rynning, NATO In Afghanistan: the Liberal Disconnect (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2012), pp. 57–58.

    Google Scholar 

  32. See, for example, Roland Paris, ‘Peacebuilding and the Limits of Liberal Internationalism’, International Security, Vol. 22(2), Fall 1997, pp. 54–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. On this ‘liberal security problematic’, see Mark Duffield, Development, Security and Unending War. Governing the World of Peoples (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Tim Bird

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bird, T. (2013). ‘Perennial Dilemmas’: NATO’s Post-9/11 Afghanistan ‘Crisis’. In: Hallams, E., Ratti, L., Zyla, B. (eds) NATO beyond 9/11. New Security Challenges. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230391222_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics