Skip to main content

‘Déjà vu all over again’?: 11 September 2001 and NATO Military Transformation

  • Chapter
NATO beyond 9/11

Part of the book series: New Security Challenges ((NSECH))

Abstract

Just over a decade after the 11 September 2001 (9/11) terrorist attacks, the heads of state and government of NATO met in Chicago on 20–21 May 2012. The Chicago Summit meeting had three main issues on its agenda: Afghanistan; burden-sharing and global partnerships.2 The primary issue discussed by the heads of state and government of the alliance member states was the policy for NATO’s exit from Afghanistan by 2014. NATO’s engagement in Afghanistan has been an important yet divisive issue for the alliance for most of the past decade, and agreeing a strategy for a workable exit from that country was thus unsurprisingly the main focus of the summit. The military, political and economic commitment the alliance made to Afghanistan was not a direct result of 9/11, but the conflict in Afghanistan was. The second major issue on the summit agenda was the question of burden-sharing. Burden-sharing has been a perennial issue virtually throughout the alliance’s 63-year history, but is an issue that gained increased saliency in the 1990s, after the dissipation of the Cold War. The events in the immediate aftermath of 9/11 cast the issue in a new and harsh light, and since then military transformation has been a central pillar of NATO policy. The third main item on the Chicago Summit’s agenda was strengthening and enlarging the alliance’s global partnerships. All three of these items on the alliance’s summit agenda in Chicago are a legacy of the terrorist attacks in New York and Arlington of a decade earlier.

Yogi Berra, the American baseball player, reportedly said, ‘It’s déjà vu all over again’ when he witnessed Mickey Mantle and Roger Maris repeatedly hit back-to-back home runs in a NY Yankees’ game in the early 1960s. On who Yogi Berra was, see ‘Yogi Berra’, Wikipedia, available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yogi_Berra.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Martin A. Smith, ‘Afghanistan in Context: NATO Out-of-Area Debates in the 1990s’, Unidad de Investigacion Sobre Seguidad y Cooperacion Internacional Discussion Papers, No. 22, January, 2010, pp. 16–33.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For detailed accounts of NATO interventions in the former Yugoslavia in the 1990s, see Ivo H. Daalder, Getting to Dayton: The Making of America’s Bosnia Policy (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2000);

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ivo H. Daalder, and Michael E. O’Hanlon, Winning Ugly: Nato’s War to Save Kosovo (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2001);

    Google Scholar 

  4. Giovanna Bono, NATO’s ‘Peace-Enforcement’ Tasks and ‘Policy Communities’: 1990–1999 (Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  5. John E. Peters, Nora Bensahel, Stuart Johnson, Timothy Liston, and Traci Williams, European Contributions to Operation Allied Force: Implications for Transatlantic Cooperation, Santa Monica: RAND, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  6. For a thorough analysis of what NATO did contribute, see Tom Lansford, All for One: Terrorism, NATO and the United States (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Allied Command Transformation, ‘NATO Response Force: transformational benefits’ (Norfolk, VA: Allied Command Transformation, 2009), p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Allied Command Transformation (ACT), Understanding NATO Military Transformation (Norfolk, VA: Allied Command Transformation Public Information Office, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  9. David Yost, ‘An interview with General James L. Jones, USMC, Retired, Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR), 2003–2006’, Research Paper, No. 34 (NATO Defence College, Rome: January 2008), p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  10. On these three states initiation of change starting in the late 1990s, see Theo Farrell and Tim Bird, ‘Innovating within Cost and Cultural Constraints: The British Approach to Military Transformation’, in Terry Terriff, Frans Osinga, and Theo Farrell (eds.), A Transformation Gap? American Innovations and European Military Change (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2010), pp. 35–58;

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. David Yost, ‘An interview with General James L. Jones, USMC, Retired, Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR), 2003–2006’, Research Paper, No. 34 (NATO Defence College, Rome: January 2008), p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See Bastian Giegerich and William Wallace, ‘Not Such a Soft Power: the External Deployment of European Forces’, Survival, Vol. 46 (2), 2004, pp. 163–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. See Jens Ringsmore, ‘NATO’s Response Force: Finally Getting it Right?’, European Security, Vol. 18 (3) (September 2009), pp. 287–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. For an analysis for the potential impact of projected European defence spending cuts on NATO’s military capabilities, see John Gordon, Stuart Johnson, F. Stephen Larrabee, and Peter A. Wilson. ‘NATO and the Challenge of Austerity’, Survival, 54 (4) (2012), pp. 121–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Terry Terriff

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Terriff, T. (2013). ‘Déjà vu all over again’?: 11 September 2001 and NATO Military Transformation. In: Hallams, E., Ratti, L., Zyla, B. (eds) NATO beyond 9/11. New Security Challenges. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230391222_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics