Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Sense of Return: NATO’s Libyan Intervention in Perspective

  • Chapter
NATO beyond 9/11

Part of the book series: New Security Challenges ((NSECH))

  • 444 Accesses

Abstract

Commenting on NATO’s 2011 intervention on behalf of Libyan rebels fighting to overthrow the regime of Muammar Gaddafi, a Swiss newspaper of international reputation asserted that the Atlantic Alliance was applying ‘the art of the possible’.1 The author declined to add that NATO’s action came at the end of more than a decade of attempting the near-impossible missions of regime change and nation-building in Afghanistan. What was deemed possible in March 2011 involved a considerable retreat from the ambitions of 2001. The alliance’s transformation — its most fundamental paradigm shift — has been under way for the two decades since the end of the Cold War and was not initiated but rather accelerated by its response to the events of 11 September 2001 (9/11). The transformation is as much the accidental product as it is the deliberate work of 22 years; NATO has attempted since 1989 to anticipate future challenges, and in its strategic concepts has articulated those challenges in a coherent fashion, but it has been conditioned by events as thoroughly as it has foreseen and shaped them. As it winds down its mission in Afghanistan, the alliance is at a watershed. It is not about to dissolve or disintegrate. As a coalition of states bound by shared political values, whose members continue to find it useful militarily and diplomatically, it endures.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Andreas Rüesch, ‘Libyen oder die Kunst des Möglichen’, Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 11 June 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W.J. Theis, Why NATO Endures (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009);

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Mancur Olsen Jr. and Richard Zeckenhauser, ‘An Economic Theory of Alliances’, Review of Economic Statistics, Vol. 48 (3), 1966, pp. 266–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. David S. Yost, NATO Transformed: The Alliance’s New Roles in International Security (Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace, 1998);

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alexandra Gheciu, NATO in the ‘New Europe’: The Politics of International Socialization after the Cold War (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ivo H. Daalder, Getting to Dayton: The Making of America’s Bosnia Policy (Washington, DC: Brookings, 2000);

    Google Scholar 

  7. Henning A. Frantzen, NATO and Peace Support Operations, 1991–1999: Policies and Doctrines (London: Frank Cass, 2005);

    Google Scholar 

  8. Joyce P. Kaufman, NATO and the Former Yugoslavia: Crisis Conflict and the Atlantic Alliance (Lanham: Rowan & Littlefield, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rebecca R. Moore, NATO’s New Mission: Projecting Stability in a Post-Cold War World (Westport: Praeger, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Adrian Hyde-Price, Germany and European Order: Enlarging NATO and the EU (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000);

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stephen F. Larrabee, NATO’s Eastern Agenda in a New Strategic Era (Santa Monica: Rand, 2003);

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wade Jacoby, The Enlargement of the European Union and NATO: Ordering from the Menu in Central Europe (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. O. Holsti, P.T. Hopmann and J.D. Sullivan, Unity and Disintegration in International Alliances: Comparative Studies (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1973);

    Google Scholar 

  14. G.H. Snyder, Alliance Politics (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1997);

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bruno Tertrais, ‘The Changing Nature of Military Alliances’, Washington Quarterly, Vol. 27 (2), 2004, pp. 135–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Massimo Salvadori, NATO, A Twentieth Century Community of Nations (New York: D. Van Nostrand, 1957), pp. 97–98;

    Google Scholar 

  17. Karl W. Deutsch et al., Political Community in the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1957);

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tony Judt, Postwar: A History of Europe Since 1945 (New York: Penguin, 2005), p. 149.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Marc Trachtenberg, A Constructed Peace: The Making of the European Settlement, 1945–1963 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999);

    Google Scholar 

  20. John Gillingham, European Integration, 1950–2003: Superstate or New Market Economy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 27–28;

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Ernst B. Haas, The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces, 1950–1957 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Trachtenberg, A Constructed Peace, p. 216; Diane B. Kunz, The Economic Diplomacy of the Suez Crisis (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1991);

    Google Scholar 

  23. Robert A. Divine, Eisenhower and the Cold War (New York: Oxford University Press, 1981), pp. 79–88;

    Google Scholar 

  24. David Carlton, Britain and the Suez Crisis (Oxford: Blackwell, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gareth Winrow, Dialogue with the Mediterranean: The Role of NATO’s Mediterranean Initiative (New York: Garland, 2000), p. 56;

    Google Scholar 

  26. Roberto Aliboni, ‘European Security Across the Mediterranean’, Chaillot Papers, No.2 March 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Richard A. Falkenrath, Shaping Europe’s Military Order: The Origins and Consequences of the CFE Treaty (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1995), pp. 1–31;

    Google Scholar 

  28. Raymond L. Garthoff, The Great Transition: American-Soviet Relations and the End of the Cold War (Washington, DC: Brookings, 1994), pp. 411–413, 434.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Simon Jeffrey, NATO and the Czech and Slovak Republics: A Comparative Study in Civil-Military Relations (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Thomas S. Szayna, NATO Enlargement, 2000–2015: Determinants and Implications for Defense Planning and Shaping (Santa Monica: RAND, 2001), p. 132.

    Google Scholar 

  31. David S. Yost, NATO Transformed: The Alliance’s New Roles in International Security (Washington D.C.: United States Institute of Peace, 1998);

    Google Scholar 

  32. Carl C. Hodge (ed.), Redefining European Security (New York: Garland, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Shashi Tharoor, ‘The Changing Face of Peacekeeping’, in Barbara Benton (ed.), Soldiers for Peace: Fifty Years of United Nations Peacekeeping (New York: Facts on File, 1996), p. 210;

    Google Scholar 

  34. Benjamin Seet and Gilbert M. Burnham, ‘Fatality Trends in United Nations Peacekeeping Operations, 1948–1998’, Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 284 (5), 2000, pp. 598–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. General Rupert Smith, The Utility of Force: The Art of War in the Modern World (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2007), pp. 320–322, p. 336.

    Google Scholar 

  36. David C. Gompert et al, Mind the Gap: Promoting a Transatlantic Revolution in Military Affairs (Washington, DC: National Defense University, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Simon Duke, The Elusive Quest for European Security from EDC to CFSP (New York: St. Martin’s, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sten Rynning, Changing Military Doctrine: Presidents and Military Power in Fifth Republic France (Westport: Praeger, 2002), p. 168;

    Google Scholar 

  39. Jeffrey B. Jones, ‘French Forces for the 21st Century’, Joint Force Quarterly, Summer 2000, pp. 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lawrence Freedman and Efraim Karsh, The Gulf Conflict, 1990–1991: Diplomacy and War in the New World Order (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993), pp. 110–118.

    Google Scholar 

  41. John Duffield, World Power Forsaken: Political Culture, International Institutions, and German Security Policy After Reunification (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998), pp. 173–221.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ivo H. Daalder and Michael E. O’Hanlon, Winning Ugly: NATO’s War to Save Kosovo (Washington, DC: Brookings, 2000), pp. 30–31, 34–35.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ibid., pp. 132–134, 156–161; Anthony Seddon, Blair (London: Simon & Schuster, 2004), pp. 398–407;

    Google Scholar 

  44. Oliver Daddow, ‘Tony’s War? Blair, Kosovo and the Interventionist Impulse in British Foreign Policy’, International Affairs, Vol. 85 (3), 2009, p. 559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Martin van Creveld, The Age of Airpower (New York: Public Affairs, 2011), p. 331.

    Google Scholar 

  46. John E. Peters, Stuart Johnson, Nora Bensahel, Timothy Liston, Traci Williams, European Contributions to Operation Allied Force: Implications for Transatlantic Cooperation (Santa Monica: Rand, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Benjamin Lambeth, NATO’s Air War for Kosovo: A Strategic and Operational Assessment (Santa Monica: RAND, 2001), pp. 248–249.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Shaun Gregory, ‘The French Military in Africa: Past and Present’, African Affairs, Vol. 99, 2000, pp. 438–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Seddon, Blair, p. 406; Charles G. Cogan, The Third Option: The Emancipation of European Defense, 1989–2000 (Westport: Praeger, 2001);

    Google Scholar 

  50. Tony Chafer and Gordon Cumming, ‘Beyond Fashoda: Anglo-French Security Cooperation in Africa since Saint-Malo’, International Affairs, Vol. 86 (5), 2010, pp. 1132–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Paul Williams, ‘Fighting for Freetown: British Military Intervention in Sierra Leone’, Contemporary Security Policy, Vol. 22 (3), 2001, pp. 140–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Matthew A. Baum, ‘How Public Opinion Constrains the Use of Force: The Case of Operation Restore Hope’, Presidential Studies Quarterly, Vol. 34 (2), 2004, pp. 187–226.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Carl Cavanagh Hodge, Atlanticism for a New Century: The Rise, Triumph, and Decline of NATO (Upper Saddle River: Pearson, 2005), p. 66;

    Google Scholar 

  54. See Presidential Decision Directive/NSC 25, 3 May 1994; Condoleezza Rice, ‘Promoting the National Interest’, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 79 (1), 2000, pp. 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. J. Pressman, Warring Friends: Alliance Restraint in International Politics (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  56. C. Coker, ‘NATO as a Postmodern Alliance’, in S.P. Ramet and C. Ingerbritsen (eds.), Coming in from the Cold: Changes in US-European Interactions since 1980 (Lanham: Rowan & Littlefield, 2002), pp. 16–30.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ivo H. Daalder and James M. Lindsay, America Unbound: The Bush Revolution in Foreign Policy (Washington, DC: Brookings, 2003), pp. 64–65.

    Google Scholar 

  58. William Wallace, ‘From the Atlantic to the Bug, from the Arctic to the Tigris? The Transformation of the EU and NATO’, International Affairs, Vol. 76 (3), 2000, p. 492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Peter L. Bergen, The Longest War: The Enduring Conflict between America and alQaeda (New York: Free Press, 2011), p. 80.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Marc Trachtenberg, ‘Preventive War and US Foreign Policy’, Security Studies, Vol. 16 (1), 2007, pp. 1–31;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Hew Strachan, ‘Pre-emption and Prevention in Historical Perspective’, in Henry Shue and David Rodin (eds.), Preemption: Military Action and Moral Justification (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Robert J. Delahunty and John Yoo, ‘The “Bush Doctrine”: Can Preventive War be Justified?’, Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, Vol. 32 (3), 2009, pp. 843–865.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Philip Gordon and Jeremy Shapiro, Allies at War: America, Europe and the Crisis over Iraq (New York: McGraw Hill, 2004);

    Google Scholar 

  64. Elizabeth Pond, Friendly Fire: The Near Death of the Transatlantic Alliance (Washington, DC: Brookings, 2003);

    Google Scholar 

  65. Tim Bird and Alex Marshall, Afghanistan: How the West Lost its Way (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2011), p. 117, p. 154.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Antonio Giustozzi, Koran, Kalashnikov and Laptop: The Neo-Taliban Insurgency in Afghanistan (New York: Columbia University Press, 2008), pp. 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Philipp Münch, ‘Strategielos in Afghanistan: Die Operationsführung der Bundeswehr in Rahmen der International Security Assistance Force’, SWP-Studie, November 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Bird and Marshall, pp. 136–139; Touko Piiparinen, ‘A Clash of Mindsets? An Insider’s Account of Political Reconstruction Teams’, International Peacekeeping, Vol. 14 (1), 2007, pp. 143–157;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Nima Abbaszadeh et al., Provincial Construction Teams: Lessons and Recommendations (Woodrow Wilson School of Public & International Affairs, January 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Gary G. Bass, Freedom’s Battle: The Origins of Humanitarian Intervention (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2008), p. 379.

    Google Scholar 

  71. John A. Nagl, Learning to Eat Soup with a Knife: Counterinsurgency Lessons from Malaya and Vietnam (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005);

    Google Scholar 

  72. David Galula, Counterinsurgency Warfare: Theory and Practice (Westport: Praeger, 1964);

    Google Scholar 

  73. Andrew Krepinevich, The Army in Vietnam (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  74. For example, Giustozzi, pp. 213–217; Also Ahmed S. Hashim, Insurgency and Counter-Insurgency in Iraq (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Alex Marshall, ‘Imperial Nostalgia, the Liberal Lie, and the Perils of Postmodern Counterinsurgency’, Small Wars &Insurgencies, Vol. 21 (2), 2010, pp. 233–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Douglas Porch, ‘The Dangerous Myths and Dubious Promise of COIN’, Small Wars & Insurgencies, Vol. 22 (2), 2011, pp. 239–257;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Jonathan E. Gumz, ‘Reframing the Historical Problematic of Insurgency: How the Professional Military Literature Created a New History and Missed the Past’, Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 32 (4), 2009, pp. 553–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Stuart Griffin, ‘Iraq, Afghanistan and the Future of British Military Doctrine: from Counterinsurgency to Stabilization’, International Affairs, Vol. 87 (2), 2011, pp. 317–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Christopher Paul, Colin P. Clarke, Beth Grill, Victory Has a Thousand Fathers: Detailed Counterinsurgency Case Studies (Santa Monica: RAND, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Richard A. Oppel Jr. and Graham Bowley, ‘Afghan Attacks on Allied Troops Prompt NATO to Shift Policy’, New York Times, 18 August 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  81. See also

    Google Scholar 

  82. Gilles Dorronoso, ‘Waiting for the Taliban in Afghanistan’, Carnegie Papers, September 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Stanley Sloan, ‘NATO in Afghanistan’, UNSCI Discussion Papers, No. 22, January 2010, pp. 47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  84. M. Clarke, ‘The Making of Britain’s Libya Strategy’, in Adrian Johnson and Saqeb Mueen (eds.), Short War, Long Shadow: The Political and Military Legacies of the 2011 Libya Campaign (Royal United Services Institute, Whitehall Report 1–12, 2012), p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Quoted in Ibid, p. 8. See also Patrick Wintour and Nicholas Watt, ‘David Cameron’s Libyan war: why the PM felt Gaddafi had to be stopped’, The Guardian, 2 October 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Mark Phillips, ‘Accidental Heroes: Britain, France and the Libyan Operation’, RUSI Interim Campaign Report, Royal United Services Institute, September 2011, pp. 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Gareth Winrow, Dialogue with the Mediterranean: The Role of NATO’s Mediterranean Initiative (New York: Garland, 2000), pp. 140–142.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Yahia H. Zoubir, ‘Libya and Europe: Economic Realism at the Rescue of the Qaddafi Authoritarian Regime’, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, Vol. 17 (3), 2009, pp. 401–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Scott Wilson, ‘Obama: US had Responsibility to Act in Libya’, Washington Post, 28 March 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Anand Menon, ‘European Defence Policy from Lisbon to Libya’, Survival, Vol. 53 (3), 2011, pp. 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Julian Lindley-French, ‘In the Shade of Locarno? Why European Defence is Failing’, International Affairs, Vol. 78 (4), 2002, pp. 789–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Christian F. Anrig, ‘Allied Air Power over Libya: A Preliminary Assessment’, Air & Space Power Journal, Vol. 25 (4), 2011, pp. 89–109;

    Google Scholar 

  93. Elizabeth Quintana, ‘The War from the Air’, in Adrian Johnson and Saqeb Mueen, Short War, Long Shadow: The Political and Military Legacies of the 2011 Libyan Campaign (Whitehall Report 1–12, Royal United Services Institute, 2012), pp. 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Sean Kay, ‘What is NATO’s Role in a New Trans-Atlantic Bargain?’, in Mark D. Ducasse (ed.), The Transatlantic Bargain (Rome: NATO Defense College, 2012), p. 126.

    Google Scholar 

  95. David Alexander and David Brunnstrom, ‘Gates parting shot warns NATO risks irrelevance’, Financial Times, 11 June 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Department of Defense, Sustaining US Global Leadership: Priorities for the 21st Century, 3 January 2012, p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Office of the Secretary of Defense, Annual Report to Congress, Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Charles G. Cogan, The Third Option: The Emancipation of European Defense, 1989–2000 (Westport: Praeger, 2001);

    Google Scholar 

  99. Etienne de Durand, ‘Entente or Oblivion: Prospects and Pitfalls of Franco-British Co-operation on Defence,’ Future Defence Review Working Paper 8, Royal United Services Institute, September, 2010;

    Google Scholar 

  100. Alexandre Sheldon-Duplaix, ‘Franco-British Relations at Sea and Overseas’, Naval War College Review, Vol. 64(1), Winter 2011, pp. 79–94.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Jolyon Howarth, ‘The Euro-Atlantic Security Dilemma: France, Britain, and the ESDP’, Journal of Transatlantic Studies, Vol. 3 (1), 2005, p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Tony Chafer, ‘The AU: A New Arena for Anglo-French Cooperation in Africa?’, Journal of Modern African Studies, Vol. 49 (1), 2011, pp. 55–82;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Tomas Valasek, ‘What Libya Says About the Future of the Transatlantic Alliance?’, Centre for European Reform, July 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Jeffrey H. Michaels, ‘NATO after Libya: Alliance Adrift?’, RUSI Journal, Vol. 156 (6), 2011, pp. 56–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Anrig, p. 92; Johannes Varwick and Martin Schmid, ‘Perspektiven für die deutsche Nato-Politik’, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, Vol. 62 (10), 2012, p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Klaus Naumann, ‘Ich schäme mich für die Haltung meines Landes’, Süddeutsche Zeiting, 20 March 2011;

    Google Scholar 

  107. Klaus Naumann, ‘Frankreich stänkert gegen Deutschland’, Handelsblatt, 24 March 2011;

    Google Scholar 

  108. Michaela Wiegel, ‘Frankreuch freut und ärgertsich’, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 18 March 2011;

    Google Scholar 

  109. Christos Katsioulis, ‘Die deutsche Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik nach der Intervention in Libyen’, Internationals Politik und Gesellschaft, Vol. 4, 2011, pp. 27–44.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Ellen Hallams and Benjamin Scheer, ‘Towards a ‘Post-American Alliance’? NATO Burden-Sharing after Libya’, International Affairs, Vol. 88 (2), 2012, pp. 313–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. HM Government, Securing Britain in an Age of Uncertainty: The Strategic Defence and Security Review, October 2010, p. 3

    Google Scholar 

  112. Ben Jones, ‘Franco-British Military Cooperation: A New Engine for European Defence?’, European Union Institute for Security Studies, Occasional Paper No. 88, February 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  113. Mark Webber, ‘Three Questions for the Strategic Concept’, in Jens Ringsmose and Sten Rynning (eds.), NATO’s New Strategic Concept: A Comprehensive Assessment (Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies, 2011), p. 103.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Ivo H. Daalder and James G Stavridis, ‘NATO’s Victory in Libya: The Right Way to Run an Intervention’, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 91 (2), 2012, pp. 2–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Carl Cavanagh Hodge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. King’s College London, UK

    Ellen Hallams (Lecturer in Defence Studies) (Lecturer in Defence Studies)

  2. Roma Tre University, Italy

    Luca Ratti (Associate Professor in History of International Relations) (Associate Professor in History of International Relations)

  3. University of Ottawa, Canada

    Benjamin Zyla (Assistant Professor) (Assistant Professor)

Copyright information

© 2013 Carl Cavanagh Hodge

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hodge, C.C. (2013). A Sense of Return: NATO’s Libyan Intervention in Perspective. In: Hallams, E., Ratti, L., Zyla, B. (eds) NATO beyond 9/11. New Security Challenges. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230391222_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation