Skip to main content

NATO and Interorganizational Cooperation

  • Chapter
NATO beyond 9/11

Part of the book series: New Security Challenges ((NSECH))

  • 448 Accesses

Abstract

Working with other multinational security organizations has become an important aspect of NATO’s vocation. Changes in the international security environment since the end of the Cold War as well as since 9/11, and the operations the Alliance has conducted have been among the core drivers of recent attempts to strengthen links with other organizations. During the Cold War, NATO faced an existential threat in the Soviet-led Warsaw Pact which had territory, actors and intentions that could be analysed and capabilities that could be matched or surpassed. Since the end of this block confrontation, security challenges have increasingly become characterized by their diffuse, less than existential nature, by the multitude of actors involved ranging from state to non-state and by their transnational deterritorialized nature. This trend predates 9/11, but, nonetheless, the terrorist attacks of 9/11 and the response they provoked are the clearest illustration of the new environment and hence can be considered a catalyst of existing trends. 9/11 was an asymmetric attack on a powerful country, carried out over great distance by non-state actors using an international network of supporters and a safe haven in a failed state. Even though the combination of factors enabling the 9/11 attack to be successful will remain rare, fighting the perpetrators and trying to create conditions to prevent a similar attack has demonstrated beyond doubt the need to bring together all available instruments of security policy, ranging from military and civilian to political, economic and even cultural means. Because it would be unrealistic to expect a single organization to combine all necessary tools, for every actor in this policy arena, including NATO, the need to work with others has increased as a result.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. David C. Gompert, ‘For a Capability to Protect: Mass Killing, the African Union and NATO’, Survival, Vol.48(1), 2006, pp. 7–18, p. 7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. See, for example

    Google Scholar 

  3. Richard G. Whitmann, ‘NATO, the EU and ESDP: An Emerging Division of Labour?’, Contemporary Security Policy, Vol. 25 (3), 2004, pp. 430–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alexandru Balas, Creating Global Synergies: Inter-Organizational Cooperation in Peace Operations (Dissertation: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Markus Derblom, Eva Hagström Frisell, Jennifer Schmidt (2008). UN-EU-AU Coordination in Peace Operations in Africa. Swedish Defence Agency User Report FOI-R-2602-SE, p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  6. This table is based on Balas, Creating Global Synergies, 24–30 Rafael Biermann, ‘Inter-Organizationalism in Theory and Practice’, Studia Diplomatica, Vol. 62 (3), 2009, pp. 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  7. David S. Yost (2007), ‘NATO and International Organizations. Forum Paper No. 3’. NATO Defence College, Rome, p. 41–42.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Michael F. Harsch and Johannes Varwick, ‘NATO and the UN’, Survival, Vol.51(2), 2009, pp. 5–12, p. 7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brooke A. Smith-Windsor, ‘Misery Makes for Strange Bedfellows: The Future of the UN–NATO Strategic Partnership’, in Brooke A. Smith-Windsor (eds.), The UN and NATO: Forward from the Joint Declaration (Rome: NATO Defence College, 2011), pp. 15–52, p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alexis Vahlas, ‘Dispelling Misperceptions for a Renewed Strategy Between the United Nations and the Atlantic Alliance’, in Brooke A. Smith-Windsor (eds.), The UN and NATO: Forward from the Joint Declaration (Rome: NATO Defence College, 2011) pp. 53–75, p. 54.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Steven Haines, ‘The Influence of Operation Allied Force on the Development of the Jus ad Bellum’, International Affairs, Vol. 85 (3), 2009, pp. 477–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. See, for example, Ivo V. Daalder and Michael E. O’Hanlon, ‘Global NATO’, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 85 (5), 2006, pp. 105–113. For the worries such ideas create within the UN, see Vahlas, ‘Dispelling Misperceptions for a Renewed Strategy Between the United Nations and the Atlantic Alliance’, 56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Thomas S. Mowle and David H. Sacko, ‘Global NATO: Bandwagoning in a Unipolar World’, Contemporary Security Studies, Vol. 28 (3), 2007, pp. 597–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. James Sperling and Mark Webber, ‘NATO: From Kosovo to Kabul’, International Affairs, Vol. 85 (3), 2009, pp. 491–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lothar Gutjahr (1994). German Foreign and Defence Policy after Unification. Pinter: London.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Claas D. Knoop, ‘Die strategische Partnerschaft zwischen der Afrikanischen Union und Europa’, Denkwürdigkeiten, (78), 2012, pp. 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Touko Piiparinen, ‘The Lessons of Darfur for the Future of Humanitarian Intervention’, Global Governance, Vol. 13, 2007, pp. 365–390.

    Google Scholar 

  18. African Research Bulletin, ‘AU–EU NATO Support’, Vol.42(6), 2005, pp. 16261–16262.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Simon Duke, ‘The Future of EU–NATO Relations: A Case of Mutual Irrelevance Through Competition?’, European Integration, Vol. 30 (1), 2008, pp. 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Bastian Giegerich

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Giegerich, B. (2013). NATO and Interorganizational Cooperation. In: Hallams, E., Ratti, L., Zyla, B. (eds) NATO beyond 9/11. New Security Challenges. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230391222_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics