Abstract
The Foreword to Sons and Lovers was never intended for publication. After the publisher had received the text of the novel Lawrence sent it to his editor Edward Garnett as an afterthought, for his attention and not, as Lawrence clearly stated, for the public gaze: ‘I wanted to write a foreword, not to have one printed’ (Letters, I, p. 510). This is just one sign that, for Lawrence, writing was thinking. The Foreword to Sons and Lovers, printed posthumously by Aldous Huxley in 1932 with Lawrence’s letters, has only recently been published with the novel.1 The Foreword, which seems incomprehensible to many readers, commences the series of discursive, or philosophical, writings, which preoccupied Lawrence all his life, not separable from the fictions and the poetry. Of the discursive works these, primarily, are ‘Study of Thomas Hardy’ (‘Le Gai Savaire’, 1914); ‘The Crown’ (1915; revised 1925); ‘Goats and Compasses’ (1916, destroyed); ‘The Reality of Peace’ (1917); ‘At the Gates’ (1917, lost); the essays on American literature, where he also developed a ‘psychology’ (begun in 1917); ‘Democracy’ (1919); Psychoanalysis and the Unconscious (1919); Fantasia of the Unconscious (1921); Etruscan Places (Sketches of Etruscan Places) (1927); Apocalypse (1930). The dates given in parentheses are the dates of composition, not publication.2
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
For details of the dates of composition and publication of all of Lawrence’s works, see Paul Poplawski, The Works of D.H. Lawrence: A Chronological Checklist, with a foreword by John Worthen, supplement to The Journal of the D.H. Lawrence Society 1994–5 ( Nottingham: The D.H. Lawrence Society, 1995 ).
See, Michael Black, D.H. Lawrence: ‘Sons and Lovers’, Landmarks of World Literature series, general editor, J. P. Stern (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), pp. 94–9, p. 98.
Listening’ to the ‘speaking of language’ is the Heideggerean formulation that seems most appropriate to Lawrence. See Martin Heidegger, ’Language’, in Poetry, Language, Thought ( New York: Harper & Row, 1971 ), p. 197.
Mark Kinkead-Weekes, in D.H. Lawrence: Triumph to Exile 1912–1922 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 438–57, represents the arguments of early versions of those essays, notably a 1919 version of the Whitman essay, which did not, indeed for reasons of content, could not, achieve publication at the time. These versions have only recently surfaced (see Triumph to Exile p. 450).
For an extended discussion of the description of Lawrence’s encounter with the old woman, and its relevance to ’[t]he “metaphysic” of The Rainbow’, see Michael Bell, D.H. Lawrence: Language and Being ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992 ), pp. 57–60.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1997 Fiona Becket
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Becket, F. (1997). Thinking Poetically in the Early Discursive Writing: The Birth of the Self. In: D. H. Lawrence The Thinker as Poet. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230378995_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230378995_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-39649-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37899-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)