Skip to main content

Sanctions and Embargoes in EU-Asia Relations

  • Chapter
The Palgrave Handbook of EU-Asia Relations

Abstract

Sanctions and embargoes are a significant, yet controversial component of the EU policies towards Asia. The goal of our chapter is to provide a comprehensive overview of EU sanction policy in the region. We examine the three most prominent episodes: the arms embargo on China, the sanctions against North Korea and the sanctions against Myanmar. We address the reasons why sanctions were wielded, their characteristics and their effectiveness. We also examine the ways in which the EU positions itself in relation to the sanctions strategies of the main actors in the region, notably the US, China, Japan and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN).1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Anthony, I. (2005) Military Relevant EU-China Trade and Technology Transfers: Issues and Problems, SIPRI Paper A21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archick, K., Grimmett, R. F. and Kan, S. (2006) European Union’s arms embargo on China: Implications and options for US policy, Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, C. (2012) Speech of High Representative Catherine Ashton on the EU’s Policy on Restrictive Measures, European Parliament, Brussels, 1 February 2012, A 39/12, Brussels 2 February 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, G. (2005) The 1989 China Arms Ban: Putting Europe’s Position to Congress, London, UK: The Foreign Policy Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bünte, M. and Portela, C. (2012) ‘Myanmar: The Beginning of Reforms and the End of Sanctions’, GIGA Focus 3, Hamburg: German Institute for Global and Area Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casarini, N. (2007) ‘The International Politics of the Chinese Arms Embargo Issue’, International Spectator 42(3), pp. 371–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charron, A. (2011) United Nations Sanctions and Conflict, Routledge: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • KEEP Council of the European Union (2003) A Secure Europe in a Better World: European Security Strategy, Brussels, 12 December 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2004) ‘Basic Principles of on the Use of Restrictive Measures (Sanctions)’, Council Doc. 10198/1/04 REV 1, Brussels, 7 June 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2012) ‘Council Conclusions on Burma/Myanmar’, 3142th Foreign Affairs Council meeting, Brussels, 23 January 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falke, A. (2001) ‘The EU-US Conflict over Sanctions Policy: Confronting the Hegemon’, European Foreign Affairs Review 5(2), pp. 139–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J. (1967) ‘On the Effects of International Economic Sanctions, with examples from the case of Rhodesia’, World Politics 19(3), pp. 378–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, W. (2004, May 2). European Embargo Tops Wen’s Agenda, CNN. Available at: http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/asiapcf/05/02/wen.europe.willy/index.html (accessed 3 May 2012).

  • Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of China (Taiwan). (2006). Appeal to the European Union to Maintain Its Arms Embargo on China — Position Paper, May. Available at: http://www.mofa.gov.tw/UpLoadFiles/Upload/670d352b-2ed7-4996-a090-62978b7d3a6e.PDF (accessed 3 May 2012).

  • Noland, M. (2009) ‘The Non-Impact of UN Sanctions on North Korea’, Asia Policy 9, pp. 64–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portela, C. (2003) The European Union and the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, Peace Research Institute Frankfurt (PRIF) Research Report Nr 65, December 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2010) European Union Sanctions and Foreign Policy, Routledge: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rettman, A. (2010) Ashton Pragmatic on China in EU Foreign Policy Blueprint. Available at: http://www.euobserver.com (accessed 17 December 2010).

  • Taylor, B. (2010) Sanctions as Grand Strategy, IISS: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vennesson, P. (2007) ‘Lifting the EU Arms Embargo on China: Symbols and Strategy’ EurAmerica 37(3), pp. 417–444.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Clara Portela and Pascal Vennesson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Portela, C., Vennesson, P. (2013). Sanctions and Embargoes in EU-Asia Relations. In: Christiansen, T., Kirchner, E., Murray, P. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of EU-Asia Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230378704_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics