Abstract
Alfred Havighurst claimed that ‘by implication they [the Jury] ruled against the legality of the suspending power as exercised by James in the Declaration of Indulgence’. He also argued that none of the judges in the trial of the seven bishops asserted the legality of the suspending power — the abrogation of a law generally — they asserted that the King might dispense with the law in certain specific cases. This was the distinction reflected in the Hales judgement. While the difference in legal terms is significant, in political terms it was a distinction lost on the jury and the public, and, during the trial, the terms were used interchangeably. Havighurst suggested that the pressure of public opinion swung the trial: ‘in terms of popular pressure hardly any other trial in the seventeenth century is comparable’. During the trial, the public applauded arguments for the bishops and scorning those for the crown.1 W. L. Sachse concluded that the acquittal was a verdict against James’s whole system of government.2 The lawyers at the trial had, in defending the bishops, developed general arguments against James which would be used later in the Revolution.3
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
R. A. Beddard, ‘The Unexpected Whig Revolution of 1688’ in Beddard (ed.), The Revolutions of 1688, Oxford, 1991, p. 99.
T. Harris, ‘London Crowds and the Revolution of 1688’ in E. Cruickshanks (ed.), By Force or by Default? The Revolution of 1688–1689, Edinburgh, 1989, pp. 44–51.
D. L. Jones, ‘The Glorious Revolution in Wales’ in The National Library of Wales Journal, vol. 26, no. 1, 1989, pp. 27–31.
A. Coleby, Central Government and the Localities: Hampshire 1649–1689, Cambridge, 1987, p. 205.
F. P. Verney and M. M. Verney (eds), Memoirs of the Verney Family 1642–96, London, 1892, vol. 1, p. 458.
G. Burnet, Apology for the Church of England with relation to the Spirit of Persecution, London, 1688, p. 6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2009 William Gibson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gibson, W. (2009). The Reaction. In: James II and the Trial of the Seven Bishops. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230233782_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230233782_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-30163-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-23378-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)