Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Political Marketing and Management ((Palgrave Studies in Political Marketing and Management))

  • 672 Accesses

Abstract

With the importance of broadcast and print media, and its prioritisation by parties, as the backdrop, this chapter focuses on the relative importance of the leader debates and interviews, the impartial television news and the partisan print media, and explores the role media played in shaping and translating the marketing strategies of the parties and their leaders into news items for public consumption. The data presented allows us to draw some conclusions as to the relative successes of the various parties’ media management strategies and the impact mainstream media outlets might have on the outcome of election contests irrespective of the sophistication and skill committed to the party’s marketing strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Botan, C. H., & Trowbridge, J. G. (2015). Public relations theory: Past present and future. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, D., Downey, J., Stanyer, J., & Wring, D. (2015). General Election 2015: the media campaign [report 5 covering 30th March–7th May]. https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/dspace-jspui/handle/2134/18148

  • Foss, S. K., & Foss, K. A. (2011). Constricted and constructed potentiality: An inquiry into paradigms of change. Western Journal of Communication, 75(2), 205–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R. K., & Römmele, A. (2009). Measuring the professionalization of political campaigning. Party Politics, 15(3), 265–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenslade, R. (2015). Yes, rightwing newspaper coverage did cause Ed Miliband’s Downfall. The Guardian, May 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm, T. (2015). Liam Byrne says ‘there’s no money’ note harmed Labour’s election campaign. The Guardian, May 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellwig, T., & Coffey, E. (2011). Public opinion, party messages, and responsibility for the financial crisis in Britain. Electoral Studies, 30(3), 417–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopmann, D. N., Elmelund-Praestekaer, C., Albæk, E., Vliegenthart, R., & de Vreese, C. H. (2012). Party media agenda-setting: How parties influence election news coverage. Party Politics, 18(2), 173–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, P. N. (2006). New media campaigns and the managed citizen. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellner, D. (2009). Media spectacle and the 2008 presidential election. Cultural Studies, Critical Methodologies, 9(6), 707–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcbride, D. (2014) Power Trip: A Decade of Policy, Plots and Spin. London: Biteback.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyen, M., Thieroff, M., & Strenger, S. (2014). Mass media logic and the mediatization of politics: A theoretical framework. Journalism Studies, 15(3), 271–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, A. (2015). The effectiveness of leader visits during the 2010 British general election campaign. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 17(2), 244–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negrine, R., & Lilleker, D. G. (2002). The professionalization of political communication continuities and change in media practices. European Journal of Communication, 17(3), 305–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savigny, H., & Temple, M. (2010). Political marketing models: The curious incident of the dog that doesn’t bark. Political Studies, 58(5), 1049–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharrer, E., & Ramasubramanian, S. (2015). Intervening in the media’s influence on stereotypes of race and ethnicity: The role of media literacy education. Journal of Social Issues, 71(1), 171–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shehata, A., & Strömbäck, J. (2014). Mediation of political realities: Media as crucial sources of information. In F. Esser & J. Strömbäck (Eds.), Mediatization of politics. Understanding the transformation of western democracies (pp. 93–113). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strömbäck, J., & Nord, L. W. (2006). Do politicians lead the tango? A study of the relationship between Swedish journalists and their political sources in the context of election campaigns. European Journal of Communication, 21(2), 147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenscher, J., Koc-Michalska, K., Lilleker, D. G., Mykkänen, J., Walter, A. S., Findor, A., Jalali, C., & Róka, J. (2015). The professionals speak: Practitioners’ perspectives on professional election campaigning. European Journal of Communication, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wring, D., & Ward, S. (2015). Exit velocity: The media election. In J. Geddes & S. Tonge (Eds.), Britain votes (2015) (pp. 224–240). London: Hansard Society.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lilleker, D.G. (2016). Strategic Media Management. In: Lilleker, D., Pack, M. (eds) Political Marketing and the 2015 UK General Election. Palgrave Studies in Political Marketing and Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58440-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics