Abstract
This chapter demonstrates the ways the early modern belief in dispersed sympathetic forces informs the representation of political obedience in King Lear. Reading the migration of the word “nothing” throughout the play as an index of what Sianne Ngai calls a “minor affect” allows us to bypass moments of highly charged emotion in order to focus on political affiliations constituted by natural, mimetic, sympathetic bonds driven by impersonal and unconscious processes. This exploration of competing models of political affect in the period thus prompts a reconsideration of the role played by non-empathetic and non-epiphanic experiences that lie below the threshold of consciousness in analyses of early modern structures of social and political power.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Agamben, Giorgio. Potentialities: Collected Essays in Philosophy. Trans. Daniel Heller-Roazen. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1999.
Bauer, Robert J. “Despite of Mine Own Nature: Edmund and the Orders, Cosmic and Moral.” Texas Studies in Literature and Language 10 (Fall 1968): 359–366.
Bennett, Jane. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press, 2010.
Berlant, Lauren. Cruel Optimism. Durham: Duke University Press, 2011.
Beverungen, Armin and Stephen Dunner. “‘I’d Prefer Not to’: Bartleby and the Excesses of Interpretation.” Culture and Organization 13 (June 2007): 171–183.
Craig, Leon. Of Philosophers and Kings: Political Philosophy in Shakespeare’s Macbeth and King Lear. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2001.
Floyd Wilson, Mary. Occult Knowledge, Science, and Gender on the Shakespearean Stage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Forset, Edward. A Comparative Discourse of the Bodies Natural and Politique. London, 1606.
Gierke, Otto. Natural Law and the Theory of Society, 1500–1800. Trans. Ernest Barker. Boston: Beacon Press, 1950.
Gilman, Ernest B. “The Arts of Sympathy: Dr. Harvey, Sir Kenelm Digby, and the Arundel Circle.” Opening the Borders: Inclusivity in Early Modern Studies, Essays in Honor of James V. Mirollo. Ed. Peter Herman. Delaware: Delaware University Press, 1999: 265–297.
Graham, Kenneth. “‘Without the Form of Justice’: Plainness and the Performance of Love in King Lear.” Shakespeare Quarterly 42 (Winter 1991): 438–461.
Grzegorzewska, Malgorzata. “The War of ‘Nothings’ in the Tragedy of King Lear”. Shakespeare and Conflict: A European Perspective. Eds. Carla Dente and Sara Soncini. New York: Palgrave, 2013: 55–67.
Heinemann, Margot. “‘Demystifying the Mystery of State’: King Lear and the World Upside Down.” Shakespeare and Politics. Ed. Catherine Alexander. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004: 155–168.
Iovino, Serenella and Serpil Oppermann, eds. Material Ecocriticism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2014.
James, Susan. Passion and Action: The Emotions in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.
Kahn, Victoria. Wayward Contracts: The Crisis of Political Obligation in England, 1640–1674. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.
Lobis, Seth. The Virtue of Sympathy: Magic, Philosophy, and Literature in Seventeenth-Century England. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2015.
Lowenthal, David. Shakespeare and the Good Life: Ethics and Politics in Dramatic Form. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 1997.
MacDonald, Michael. “The Fearefull Estate of Francis Spira: Narrative, Identity, and Emotion in Early Modern England.” Journal of British Studies 31 (1992): 32–61
Massumi, Brain. Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham: Duke University Press, 2002.
———. What Animals Teach Us about Politics. Durham: Duke University Press, 2014.
———. The Politics of Affect. London: Polity, 2015.
———. The Power at the End of the Economy. Durham: Duke University Press, 2015.
Meek, Richard. “‘Rue e’en for Ruth’: Richard II and the Imitation of Sympathy.” The Renaissance of Emotion: Understanding Affect in Shakespeare and His Contemporaries. Eds. Richard Meek and Erin Sullivan. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2015: 130–153.
Milton, John R. “The Origin and Development of the Concept of the ‘Laws of Nature.’” European Journal of Sociology 22 (1981): 173–195.
Morton, Timothy. Ecology without Nature: Rethinking Environmental Aesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Mullaney, Steven. The Reformation of Emotions in the Age of Shakespeare. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.
Ngai, Sianne. Ugly Feelings. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2005.
Panagia, Davide. The Political Life of Sensation. Durham: Duke University Press, 2009.
Parr, Anthony, “New Directions: ‘The Wisdom of Nature’: Ecological Perspectives in King Lear.” King Lear: A Critical Guide. Eds. Andrew Hiscock and Lisa Hopkins. New York: Continuum, 2001:118–138.
Paster, Gail Kern. Humoring the Body: Emotions and the Shakespearean Stage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.
——— et al., eds. Reading the Early Modern Passions: Essays in the Cultural History of Emotion. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004.
Protevi, John. Political Affect: Connecting the Social and the Somatic. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2009.
Reddy, William. The Navigation of Feeling: A Framework for the History of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Roberts, Louis. “Lucretius 1.857–58 and Stoic Logic.” The Classical World 65 (March 1972): 215–217.
Rzepka, Adam. “Discourse Ex Nihilo: Epicurus and Lucretius in Sixteenth-Century England.” Dynamic Reading: Studies in the Reception of Epicureanism. Ed. W. H. Shearin and Brooke Holmes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).
Schoenfeldt, Michael. Bodies and Selves in Early Modern England: Physiology and Inwardness in Spenser, Shakespeare, Herbert, and Milton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Schulman, Alex. Rethinking Shakespeare’s Political Philosophy: From Lear to Leviathan. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2014.
Shakespeare, William. King Lear. The Norton Shakespeare. Second Edition. Eds. Stephen Greenblatt et al. New York: Norton, 2008.
Sheerin, Brian. “Making Use of Nothing: The Sovereignties of King Lear.” Studies in Philology 110 (Fall2013): 789–811.
Shupack, Paul M. “Natural Justice and King Lear.” Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature 9 (Spring-Summer1997): 76–105.
Smith, Bruce R. Phenomenal Shakespeare. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.
Sullivan, Garret and Mary Floyd-Wilson eds. Environment and Embodiment in Early Modern England. New York: Palgrave, 2007.
Tayler, Edward. “King Lear and Negation.” English Literary Renaissance 20 (1990): 17–39.
Žižek, Slavoj. The Parallax View. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2006.
———. Violence: Six Sideways Reflections. New York: Picador, 2008.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bailey, A. (2017). Speak What We Feel: Sympathy and Statecraft. In: Bailey, A., DiGangi, M. (eds) Affect Theory and Early Modern Texts. Palgrave Studies in Affect Theory and Literary Criticism. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56126-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56126-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-57074-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-56126-8
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)