Skip to main content

Elias’s Civilizing Process and Janus-Faced Modernity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Norbert Elias and Violence

Abstract

In this chapter Dépelteau argues that Elias’s approach does not fully integrate the ambivalence of modernity towards violence. Elias’s work is very useful for understanding the relative pacification of core societies (such as modern France and Great Britain) in their territories. However, it fails to explain how violence is still a central and permanent dynamic in the difficult reproduction of modern social orders. In few words, we cannot understand “pacified” societies in Europe without integrating this high level of violence which is prevalent in larger configurations. Empirical examples from colonization and texts or speeches made by “civilized” people (like J. Ferry and de Tocqueville) are used to support this thesis. We see that the use of violence is a central issue which creates many tensions (not only theoretical ones) in modernity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arendt, H. (1973) The origins of totalitarianism. Harvest Book Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Kindle Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1989). Modernity and the holocaust. London: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkitt, I. (1996). Civilization and ambivalence. The British Journal of Sociology, 47(1), 135–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Tocqueville, A. (2001). Writings on empire and slavery. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Kindle Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dépelteau, F., Passiani, E., & Mariano, R. (2013). Ariel or caliban? The civilizing process and its critiques. In F. Dépelteau & T. Savoia Landini (Eds.), Norbert Elias & social theory (pp. 41–59). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, A. C., de la Casa, B., Morley, J., Clarke, M., & Johnson, J. W. (2014). A colonialism reader. Kindle Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, E., & Mennell, S. (1998). Elias on Germany, Nazism and the holocaust: On the balance between ‘civilizing’ and ‘decivilizing’ trends in the social development of Western Europe. The British Journal of Sociology, 49(3), 339–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (1996). The Germans. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (2000). The civilizing process. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. (1997). Violence and civilization: An introduction to the work of Norbert Elias. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallois, W. (2013). A history of violence in the early Algerian colony. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goody, J. (2002). Elias and the anthropological tradition. Anthropological Theory, 2(4), 401–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, T. R. (1981). Historical trends in violent crime: A critical review of the evidence. In N. Morris & M. Tonry (Eds.), Crime and justice (Vol. 3). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. (2002). Dialectic of enlightenment (Cultural memory in the present. Stanford University Press. Kindle Edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lash, C. (1985). Historical sociology and the myth of maturity: Norbert Elias’s ‘very simple formula’. Theory and Society, 14, 705–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1992). The capital. Volume 1: A critique of political economy. New York: Penguins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mennell, S. (1990). Decivilizing processes: Theoretical significance and some lines of research. International Sociology, 5(2), 205–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pétré-Grenouilleau, O. (2004). Les Traites Négrières. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (2011). The better angels of our nature: Why violence has declined. Penguin Publishing Group. Kindle Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (2001). The great transformation: The political and economical origins of our time. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein, R. (2015). Reflections on modernity, civilization, and genocides. The World and I Online: Kindle Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, E. (2011) The Modern Word System III. Berkeley: California University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieviorka, M. (2009). Violence. A new approach. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dépelteau, F. (2017). Elias’s Civilizing Process and Janus-Faced Modernity. In: Landini, T., Dépelteau, F. (eds) Norbert Elias and Violence. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56118-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56118-3_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-56117-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-56118-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics