Abstract
This volume grows out of two parallel but distinct developments in social science research that affect the way researchers study and seek to have an impact in the areas of crime and criminal justice. These are the increasing acceptance and practice of (some form of) reflexivity in social science research, on the one hand, and, on the other, the changing context of research itself. On the latter point, we note that criminologists working across different jurisdictions are experiencing heightened pressures to render their research relevant and appealing to external audiences. These pressures are linked in part with the fact that governments in Australia, the UK and the USA (along with other countries) are increasingly keen to ensure that their investment in the higher education sector is delivering ‘value for money’. This implies that research and teaching activities that are government-funded must increasingly align with, or at least demonstrate alignment with, what these governments define as the public interest. In Australia, for example, the Australian Research Council, which is responsible for administering public research funding, has identified a list of nine strategic ‘Science and Research Priorities’ to organise funding of ‘support for science and research on the most important challenges facing Australia’ (developed partly from a 2014 white paper ‘Boosting the commercial returns of research’; see ARC 2016). With the possible exception of ‘cybersecurity’, none of these strategic priorities appear to be directly relevant to criminology or indeed, the social sciences. The specified research priorities relate primarily to what are known as ‘STEM’ subjects (Science, Technology, Engineering and Medicine), thereby prioritising an increasingly narrow set of subjects and research methodologies that reflect a pragmatic and in our view myopic governmental understanding of what constitutes societal value.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alvesson, M. and Skoldberg, K. (2009) Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research (2nd edn), London: Sage.
Annison, H. (2015) Dangerous Politics: Risk, Political Vulnerability, and Penal Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Armstrong, S. (2010) ‘Prison Prisms: Policy’s Objects in Scottish Penal Reform’, Conference paper, Interpretive Policy Association, Grenoble, France (July). URL (accessed 14 May 2016): http://www.researchcatalogue.esrc.ac.uk/grants/RES-000-22-2881/read.
Australian Research Council (ARC) (2016) ‘Science and Research Priorities’, Website. URL (accessed 14 May 2016): http://www.arc.gov.au/science-research-priorities.
Blaustein, J. (2014), ‘Reflexivity and Participatory Police Ethnography: Situating the Self in a Transnational Criminology of Harm Production’. In K. Lumsden and A. Winter. (eds.) Reflexivity in Criminological Research: Experiences with the Powerful and the Powerless, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan: 301–312.
Blaustein, J. (2015) Speaking Truths to Power: Policy Ethnography and Police Reform in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bosworth, M. and Hoyle, C. (2011) What is Criminology?, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L. (1992) Invitation to a Reflexive Sociology, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Brown, D., Cuneen, C., Schwartz, M., Stubbs, J. and Young, C. (2015) Justice Reinvestment: Winding Back Imprisonment, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Case, S. and Haines, K. (2014) ‘Reflective Friend Research: The Relational Aspects of Social Theory’. In K. Lumsden and A. Winter (eds), Reflexivity in Criminological Research: Experiences with the Powerful and the Powerless, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan: 58–74.
Cohen, S. (1988) Against Criminology, London: Transaction Publishers.
Crawford, A. (1998) Crime Prevention and Community Safety: Politics, Policies and Practices, London and New York: Longman.
Cuthbert, K. (forthcoming) Exploring the gendered experiences of those who do not feel sexual attraction, and those who choose not to be sexually active, Doctoral dissertation, University of Glasgow, manuscript on file with the editors.
Downes, D. and Morgan, R. (2012) ‘Overtaking on the Left? The Politics of Law and Order in the “Big Society”’. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan and R. Reiner (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 5th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 182–205.
Duguid, S. and Pawson, R. (1998) ‘Education, Change, and Transformation: The Prison Experience’, Evaluation Review 22(4): 470–495.
Ericson, R.V. and Carriere, K. (1994) ‘The Fragmentation of Criminology’. In D. Nelken (ed.) The Futures of Criminology, London: Sage: 89–109.
Foucault, M. (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977, Brighton: Harvester Press.
Garland, D. (1996) ‘The Limits of the Sovereign State: Strategies of Crime Control in Contemporary Society’, British Journal of Criminology 36(4): 445–471.
Garland, D. (2000) ‘The Culture of High Crime Societies: Some Preconditions of Recent Law and Order Policies’, British Journal of Criminology 40(3): 347–75.
Garland, D. (2002) ‘Of Crimes and Criminals: The Development of Criminology in Britain’. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan and R. Reiner (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 7–50.
Garland, D. and Sparks, R. (2000) ‘Criminology, Social Theory and the Challenge of Our Times’. In D. Garland and R. Sparks (eds.), Criminology and Social Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 1–22.
Goffman, E. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, London: Penguin Books.
Gouldner, A.W. (1970) The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology, London: Heineman Educational Books Ltd.
Hammersley, M. (1999) ‘Sociology, What’s It For? A Critique of Gouldner’, Sociological Research Online 4(3): no page numbers.
Haraway, D. (1988) ‘Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective’, Feminist Studies 14(3): 575–599.
Heidensohn, F. (1968) ‘The Deviance of Women: A Critique and an Inquiry’, The British Journal of Sociology 19(2): 160–175.
Henry, A. (2012) ‘Situating Community Safety: Emergent Professional Identities in Communities of Practice’, Criminology and Criminal Justice 12(4): 413–431.
Henry, A. and Mackenzie, S. (2012) ‘Brokering Communities of Practice: A Model of Knowledge Exchange and Academic-Practitioner Collaboration Developed in the Context of Community Policing’, Police Practice and Research 13(4): 315–328.
Hough, M. (2014) ‘Confessions of a Recovering “Administrative Criminologist”: Jock Young, Quantitative Research and Policy Research’, Crime Media Culture 10(3): 215–226.
Jones, T. and Newburn, T. (2002) ‘Policy Convergence and Crime Control in the USA and the UK: Streams of Influence and Levels of Impact’, Criminal Justice: The International Journal of Policy and Practice 2(2): 173–203.
Law, J. and Urry, J. (2004) ‘Enacting the Social’, Economy and Society 33(3): 390–410.
Loader, I. (2006) ‘Fall of the “Platonic Guardians”’, British Journal of Criminology 46(4): 561–586.
Loader, I. and Sparks, R. (2011) Public Criminology?, London: Routledge.
Lumsden, K. and Winter, A. (2014) Reflexivity in Criminological Research: Experiences with the Powerful and the Powerless, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Maguire, M. (2012) ‘Criminal Statistics and the Construction of Crime’. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan and R. Reiner (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 5th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 206–244.
Marshall, Y. (2008) ‘Archaeological possibilities for feminist theories of transition and transformation’, Feminist Theory, 9(1): 25–45.
Martin, J.P. (1988) ‘The Development of Criminology in Britain, 1948–1960’, British Journal of Criminology 28(2): 35–44.
Mauthner, N. and Doucet, A. (2003) ‘Reflexive Accounts and Accounts of Reflexivity in Qualitative Data Analysis’, Sociology 37(3): 413–431.
McAra, L. (2005) ‘Modelling Penal Transformation’, Punishment and Society 7(3): 277–302.
McAra, L. (2016) ‘Can Criminologists Change the World? Critical Reflections on the Politics, Performance and Effects of Criminal Justice’, British Journal of Criminology, first published online March 11, 2016 doi: 10.1093/bjc/azw015.
Morrison, K. and Sparks, R. (2015) ‘Research, Knowledge and Criminal Justice Policy: The Scottish Experience’. In H. Croall, G. Mooney and M. Munro (eds.), Crime, Justice and Society in Scotland, London: Palgrave.
Mountz, A., Bonds, A., Mansfield, B., Loyd, J., Hyndman, J., Walton-Roberts, M., Basu, R., Whitson, R., Hawkins, R., Hamilton, T, Curran, C. (2015) ‘For Slow Scholarship: A Feminist Politics of Resistance through Collective Action in the Neoliberal University’, ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 14(4, August): 1235–1259. URL (accessed 14 May 2016): http://ojs.unbc.ca/index.php/acme/article/view/1058.
Newburn, T. and Sparks, R. (2004) Criminal Justice and Political Cultures: National and International Dimensions of Crime Control, Cullompton: Willan.
Nutley, S., Walter, I. and Davies, H.T.O. (2007) Understanding Evidence: How Research can Inform Public Services, Bristol: The Polity Press.
Power, M. (1999) The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rappert, B. (1999), ‘The Uses of Relevance: Thoughts on a Reflexive Sociology’, Sociology 33(4): 705–723.
Reinharz, S. with Davidman, L. (1992) Feminist Methods in Social Research, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Simon, J. (2007) Governing Through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Souhami, A. (2007) Transforming Youth Justice: Occupational Identity and Cultural Change, Cullompton: Willan.
Stanley, L. (1990) ‘Feminist Praxis and the Academic Mode of Production: An Editorial Introduction’. In L Stanley (ed.) Feminist Praxis: Research, Theory and Epistemology in Feminist Sociology, London: Routledge: 3–19.
Stella, F. (2014) ‘Engaging with “Impact” Agendas? Reflections on Storytelling as Knowledge Exchange’. In Y. Taylor (ed.) The Entrepreneurial University: Engaging Publics, Intersecting Impact, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan: 105–124.
Taylor, I., Walton, P. and Young, J. (1973) The New Criminology: for a Social Theory of Deviance, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Wacquant, L. (1989) ‘For a Socio-Analysis of Intellectuals: On Homo Academicus’, Berkeley Journal of Sociology 34: 1–29.
Young J. (1986) ‘The Failure of Criminology: The Need for a Radical Realism’. In R. Matthews and J. Young (eds.) Confronting Crime, London: SAGE Publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Armstrong, S., Blaustein, J., Henry, A. (2017). Impact and the Reflexive Imperative in Criminal Justice Policy, Practice and Research. In: Armstrong, S., Blaustein, J., Henry, A. (eds) Reflexivity and Criminal Justice. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54642-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54642-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-54641-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-54642-5
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)