Skip to main content

‘I Understand. I Am a Participant’: Navigating the ‘Fuzzy’ Boundaries of Visual Methods in Qualitative Longitudinal Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethics and Visual Research Methods

Abstract

In this chapter we discuss how utilizing the participatory visual methodology, photovoice, in an aged care context with its unique communal setting, raised several ‘fuzzy boundary’ ethical dilemmas. To illustrate these challenges, we draw on immersive field notes from an ongoing qualitative longitudinal research (QLR) exploring the lived experience of aged care from the perspective of older residents and focus on interactions with one participant, 81-year-old Cassie. We explore how the camera, which is integral to the photovoice method, altered the researcher/participant ethical dynamics by becoming a continual ‘connector’ to the researcher. The camera took on a distinct agency, acting as a non-threatening ‘portal’ that lengthened contact, provided informal opportunities to alter the relationship dynamics and enabled unplanned participant revelation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Annear, Michael J., Grant Cushman, Bob Gidlow, Sally Keeling, Tim Wilkinson, and Heather Hopkins. 2014. A place for visual research methods in the field of leisure studies? Evidence from two studies of older adults’ active leisure. Leisure Studies 33(6): 618–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellas, Marcia L. 1999. Emotional labor in academia: The case of professors. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 561: 91–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowtell, Evelyn, Susan Sawyer, Rosalie Aroni, Julie B. Green, and Rony E. Duncan. 2013. Should I send a condolence card? Promoting emotional safety in qualitative health research through reflexivity and ethical mindfulness. Qualitative Inquiry 19(9): 652–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, Kathy. 2002. Stories and silences: Disclosures and self in chronic illness. Qualitative Inquiry 8(3): 302–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Keynote address: Fifth International Advances in Qualitative Methods Conference: Premises, principles, and practices in qualitative research: Revisiting the foundations. Qualitative Health Research 14(7): 976–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Susan, Sarah Drew, Marilys Guillemin, Catherine Howell, Deborah Warr, and Jenny Waycott. 2014. Guidelines for ethical visual research methods. Melbourne: University of Melbourne. http://vrc.org.au/guidelines-for-ethical-visual-research-methods

  • Dickson-Swift, Virginia, Erica L. James, Sandra Kippen, and Pranee Liamputtong. 2006. Blurring boundaries in qualitative health research on sensitive topics. Qualitative Health Research 16(6): 853–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Doing sensitive research: What challenges do qualitative researchers face?. Qualitative Research 7(3): 327–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, Rony E., Sarah E. Drew, Jan Hodgson, and Susan M. Sawyer. 2009. Is my mum going to hear this? Methodological and ethical challenges in qualitative health research with young people. Social Science & Medicine (1982) 69(11): 1691–1699. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, Kim, Margaret McAllister, and Louise O’Brien. 2005. Coming to autoethnography: A mental health nurse’s experience. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 4(4): 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genoe, M. Rebecca, and Sherry L. Dupuis. 2013. Picturing leisure: Using photovoice to understand the experience of leisure and dementia. The Qualitative Report 18: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Kathleen R. 2001. Introduction: Why are we interested in emotions? In The emotional nature of qualitative research, ed. Kathleen R. Gilbert, 3–15. London: CRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gubrium, Aline C., Amy L. Hill, and Sarah Flicker. 2014. Situated practice of ethics for participatory visual and digital methods in public health research and practice: A focus on digital storytelling. American Journal of Public Health Ą(9): 1606–1614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillemin, Marilys. 2004. Understanding illness: Using drawings as a research method. Qualitative Health Research 14(2): 272–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillemin, Marilys, and Lynn Gillam. 2006. Telling moments: Everyday ethics in health care. East Hawthorn: IP Communications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewinson, Terri, Kathryn Grant, and Vanessa Robinson-Dooley. 2012. Exploring “home” through residents’ lenses: Assisted living facility residents identify homelike characteristics using photovoice. Journal of Gerontological Social Work 55(8): 745–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Greg, and Brenda Happell. 2006. Talking about hope: The use of participant photography. Issues in Mental Health Nursing 27(10): 1051–1065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Evonne, Geraldine Donoghue, and Sarah Holland-Batt. 2015. You could scream the place down: Five Poems on the experience of aged care. Qualitative Inquiry 21(5): 410–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Claudia. 2011. Doing visual research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, Meredith. 2014. Picturing mothers: A photovoice study of body image in pregnancy. Health Sociology Review 23(3): 242–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novek, Sheila, Toni Morris-Oswald, and Verena Menec. 2012. Using photovoice with older adults: Some methodological strengths and issues. Ageing & Society 32(3): 447–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rush, Kathy L., Mary A. Murphy, and Jean F. Kozak. 2012. A photovoice study of older adult’s conceptualizations of risk. Journal of Aging Studies 26(4): 448–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, Ian. 2008. Ethics and the practice of qualitative research. Qualitative Social Work 7(4): 400–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Caroline, and Mary Ann Burris. 1997. Photovoice: Concept, methodology and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education and Behavior 24(3): 369–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Aspects of this work were supported by our industry partner and the Australian Research Council’s Linkage Projects funding scheme, under Grant LP130100036. We acknowledge and thank our industry partner and all the participants who graciously contributed to this research. We also thank Associate Professor Barbara Adkins for her thoughtful suggestions about the notion of the ‘portal’, and the anonymous reviewers and editors for their thoughtful suggestions on our earlier drafts.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Donoghue, G., Miller, E. (2016). ‘I Understand. I Am a Participant’: Navigating the ‘Fuzzy’ Boundaries of Visual Methods in Qualitative Longitudinal Research. In: Warr, D., Guillemin, M., Cox, S., Waycott, J. (eds) Ethics and Visual Research Methods. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54305-9_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics