Abstract
In this chapter, I claim that the central aim of a discursive approach to language policy in the contemporary state should be to examine what spaces are available to actors engaging with a policy, and what the affordances of those spaces are with regard to their potential to shape policy and practices. I also argue that an analysis of policy needs to take time into account as a factor which governs how actors engage with policy, and what influence they are able to exert in different spaces. The chapter combines contemporary state theory with interpretive policy analysis and critical discourse analysis to propose a comprehensive theoretical framework for analysing language policy.
Drawing on my research on Slovene language policy, I also provide examples of how this framework can be applied in the analysis of a particular policy document. I focus on how changes in the broad political context impacted the genesis of a Slovene language strategy, showing that the text was subject to various agenda shifts as the landscape around it transformed. I also show how studying the discourses that surround such policies means studying engagement with a particular topic across different social spaces, and thus taking into account different practices. I conclude by examining how this elaborated view of policy can be translated into a critical stance which is sensitive to the agencies that are inherent parts of every policy and to the forces that constrain them.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
I am referring to several grounding ideas of CDA here, namely the view of discourse as socially constitutive and constituted social practice, which is realised through language, through concrete instantiations, which may be in the form of talk, text, or image (Fairclough and Wodak 1997).
- 2.
Resequencing refers to cases where the order of elements, and with it the informational structure of the text, is modified; addition refers to the introduction of completely new elements in the text; deletion involves the complete removal of elements from the text; substitution refers to direct one-for-one exchanges of elements in the text (Wodak 2000, p. 77).
- 3.
http://mailman.ijs.si/mailman/listinfo/slovlit (Accessed 1 June 2015).
References
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
Beck, U. (1998). Politics of risk society. In J. Franklin (Ed.), The politics of risk society (pp. 9–22). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Birkland, T. A. (1997). After disaster: Agenda setting, public policy, and focusing events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Birkland, T. A. (2006). Lessons of disaster: Policy change after catastrophic events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in late modernity: Rethinking critical discourse analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
De Fine Licht, J., Naurin, D., Esaiasson, P., & Gilljam, M. (2014). When does transparency generate legitimacy? Experimenting on a context-bound relationship. Governance – An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions, 27(1), 111–134.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
Fairclough, N., & Fairclough, I. (2012). Political discourse analysis: A method for advanced students. London: Routledge.
Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. A. Van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (pp. 258–284). London: Sage.
Fischer, F. (2007). Deliberative policy analysis as practical reason: Integrating empirical and normative arguments. In F. Fischer, G. Miller, & M. S. Sidney (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics, and methods (pp. 223–236). Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.
Fischer, F., & Forester, J. (1993). The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Durham: Duke University Press.
Giddens, A. (1991). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
Gottweis, H. (2007). Rhetoric in policy making: Between logos, ethos and pathos. In F. Fischer, G. Miller, & M. S. Sidney (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics, and methods (pp. 237–250). Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.
Hult, F. M. (2010). Analysis of language policy discourses across the scales of space and time. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 202, 7–24.
Jann, W., & Wegrich, K. (2007). Theories of the policy cycle. In F. Fischer, G. Miller, & M. S. Sidney (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics, and methods (pp. 43–63). Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.
Jenkins, R. (2007). The meaning of policy/policy as meaning. In S. Hodgson & Z. Irving (Eds.), Policy reconsidered: Meanings, politics and practices (pp. 21–36). Bristol: The Policy Press.
Jessop, B. (1990). State theory: Putting the capitalist state in its place. Cambridge: Polity.
Jessop, B. (2007). State power: A strategic-relational approach. Cambridge: Polity.
Jessop, B. (2014). Repoliticising depoliticisation: Theoretical preliminaries on some responses to the American fiscal and Eurozone debt crises. Policy and Politics, 42(2), 1–17.
Johnson, D. C. (2013). Language policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Johnson, D. C., & Johnson, E. J. (2015). Power and agency in language policy appropriation. Language Policy, 14(3), 221–243.
Koller, V., & Davidson, P. (2008). Social exclusion as conceptual and grammatical metaphor: a cross-genre study of British policy-making. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 307–331.
Krzyżanowski, M. (2011). Ethnography and critical discourse analysis: towards a problem-oriented research dialogue. Critical Discourse Studies, 4(8), 231–238.
Krzyżanowski, M. (2013). Policy, policy communication and discursive shifts: Analyzing EU policy discourses on climate change. In P. Cap & U. Okulska (Eds.), Analysing genres in political communication: Theory and practice (pp. 101–134). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Krzyżanowski, M., & Wodak, R. (2010). Hegemonic multilingualism in/of the EU institutions: An inside-outside perspective on the European language policies and practices. In C. Hülmbauer, E. Vetter, & H. Böhringer (Eds.), Mehrsprachigkeit aus der Perspektive zweier EU-Projekte: DYLAN Meets LINEE (pp. 115–135). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Krzyżanowski, M., & Wodak, R. (2011). Political strategies and language policies: The European Union Lisbon strategy and its implications for the EU’s language and multilingualism policy. Language Policy, 10(2), 115–136.
Lendvai, N., & Stubbs, P. (2007). Policy as translation: situating transnational social policies. In S. Hodgson & Z. Irving (Eds.), Policy reconsidered: Meanings, politics and practices (pp. 173–190). Briston: The Policy Press.
Levinson, B., Sutton, M., & Winstead, T. (2009). Educational policy as a practice of power: Theoretical tools, ethnographic methods, democratic options. Educational Policy, 23(6), 767–795.
Madison, D. S. (2005). Critical ethnography: Methods, ethics, and performance. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
McCarty, T. L., Romero-Little, M. E., Warhol, L., & Zepeda, O. (2010). Critical ethnography and indigenous language survival. In T. L. McCarty (Ed.), Ethnography and language policy (pp. 31–52). London: Routledge.
Mulderrig, J. (2011). Manufacturing consent: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis of new labour’s educational governance. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(6), 562–578.
Naurin, D. (2007). Deliberation behind closed doors: Transparency and lobbying in the European Union. Colchester: ECPR Press.
Nowotny, H. (1994). Time: The modern and postmodern experience. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Petković, B. (2003). Romi v Sloveniji – tujci za vedno? (Boj med politiko vključevanja in zavračanja Romov). Poročilo skupine za spremljanje nestrpnosti, 2, 54–75.
Pülzl, H., & Treib, O. (2007). Implementing public policy. In F. Fischer, G. Miller, & M. S. Sidney (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics, and methods (pp. 89–108). Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.
Ricento, T. (2000). Historical and theoretical perspectives in language policy and planning. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(2), 196–213.
Roe, E. (1994). Narrative policy analysis: Theory and practice. Durham: Duke University Press.
Sarewitz, D., Pielke, R. A., & Keykhah, M. (2003). Vulnerability and risk: Some thoughts from a political and policy perspective. Risk Analysis, 23(4), 805–810.
Savski, K. (2016). Slovene language policy in time and space: The trajectory of a language strategy from inception to implementation (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Schiffman, H. (1996). Linguistic culture and language policy. London: Routledge.
Scollon, R. (2001). Action and text: towards an integrated understanding of the place of text in social (inter)action, mediated discourse analysis and the problem of social action. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 139–183). London: Sage.
Scollon, R. (2008). Analyzing public discourse: Discourse analysis in the making of public policy. London: Routledge.
Shohamy, E. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. London: Routledge.
Spolsky, B. (2004). Language policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stone, D.A. (2012), Policy paradox: The art of political decision making, (3rd edn.), New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
Turnbull, N. (2008). Harold Lasswell’s “problem orientation” for the policy sciences. Critical Policy Studies, 2(1), 72–91.
Unger, J. W. (2013). The discursive construction of the Scots language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1992). Discourse and the denial of racism. Discourse & Society, 3(1), 87–117.
Wagenaar, H. (2011). Meaning in action: Interpretation and dialogue in policy analysis. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.
Weiss, C. H., & Wittrock, B. (1991). Summing up: Social sciences and modern states. In P. Wagner, C. H. Weiss, B. Wittrock, & H. Wollmann (Eds.), Social sciences and modern states: National experiences and theoretical crossroads (pp. 356–368). Cambridge: CUP.
Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (2001). Vygotski and Bakthin on community. In U. Sätterlund Larsson (Ed.), Socio-cultural theory and methods: An anthology (pp. 23–49). Uddevala: University Trollhättan.
Wodak, R. (2000). From conflict to consensus? The co-construction of a policy paper. In P. Muntigl, G. Weiss, & R. Wodak (Eds.), European Union discourses on un/employment: An interdisciplinary approach to employment, policy-making and organizational change (pp. 234 p.). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Wodak, R. (2011). The discourse of politics in action: Politics as usual. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 1–33). Los Angeles: Sage.
Wodak, R., & van Leeuwen, T. (1999). Legitimizing immigration control: A discourse-historical analysis. Discourse Studies, 1(1), 83–118.
Wodak, R., & Weiss, G. (2001). We are different than the Americans and the Japanese!: A critical discourse analysis of decisionmaking in European Union meetings about employment policies. In E. Weigand & M. Dascal (Eds.), Negotiation and power in dialogic interaction (pp. 39–63). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wodak, R., Krzyżanowski, M., & Forchtner, B. (2012). The interplay of language ideologies and contextual cues in multilingual interactions: Language choice and code-switching in European Union institutions. Language in Society, 41(2), 157–186.
Yanow, D. (2000). Conducting interpretive policy analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Yanow, D. (2007). Qualitative-interpretive methods in policy research. In F. Fischer, G. Miller, & M. S. Sidney (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics, and methods (pp. 405–416). Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Savski, K. (2016). State Language Policy in Time and Space: Meaning, Transformation, Recontextualisation. In: Barakos, E., W. Unger, J. (eds) Discursive Approaches to Language Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53134-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53134-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-53133-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-53134-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)