Abstract
As Karl Marx famously wrote: ‘If everything were as it appeared on the surface, there would be no need for science’ (cited in Harvey 2014, p. 4). Marx used the term ‘fetishism’ to refer to the masks, disguises, and distortions that surround us, and his desire to understand what was really going on in the world, especially with reference to rapid industrialization in the nineteenth-century Europe, required a massive analysis and critique of capital in order to uncover the fundamental bases of social relations and social inequality in society. In Volume 1 of his magisterial work Capital (1967), Marx made the following observation regarding the task that confronted the reader of his book:
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blommaert, J. (2006). Language policy and national identity. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 238–254). Malden: Blackwell.
Blommaert, J. (2013). Policy, policing and the ecology of social norms: Ethnographic monitoring revisited. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 219, 123–140.
Blommaert, J., & Verschueren, J. (1998). Debating diversity: Analysing the discourse of tolerance. New York: Routledge.
Habermas, J. (1982). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of Bourgeois society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Harvey, D. (2006). The limits to capital. London: Verso.
Harvey, D. (2014). Seventeen contradictions and the end of capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hymes, D. (1967). Models of the interaction of language and social setting. Journal of Social Issues, 23(2), 8–28.
Hymes, D. (1996). Ethnography, linguistics, narrative inequality: Toward an understanding of voice. London: Taylor & Francis.
Johnson, D. C. (2010). Implementational and ideological spaces in bilingual education language policy. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13(1), 61–79.
Labov, W. (1982). Objectivity and commitment in linguistic science: The case of the Black English trial in Ann Arbor. Language in Society, 11, 165–201.
Marx, K. (1967). Capital. New York: International Publishers.
Ricento, T. (2003). The discursive construction of Americanism. Discourse & Society, 14(5), 611–637.
Ricento, T. (2005). Problems with the “language-as-resource” discourse in the promotion of heritage languages in the U.S.A. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 9(3), 348–368.
Ricento, T. (Ed.) (2015). Language policy and political economy: English in a global context. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ricento, T. (Ed.) (2016). Language policy and planning: Critical concepts in linguistics. New York: Routledge.
Ricento, T., & Hornberger, N. H. (1996). Unpeeling the onion: Language planning and policy and the ELT professional. TESOL Quarterly, 30(3), 401–427.
Shohamy, E. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. London: Routledge.
Tollefson, J. W. (1991). Planning language, planning inequality: Language policy in the community. London: Longman.
Tollefson, J. W. (2013). Language policy in a time of crisis and transformation. In J. W. Tollefson (Ed.), Language policies in education: Critical issues (2nd ed., pp. 11–34). New York: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ricento, T. (2016). Commentary. In: Barakos, E., W. Unger, J. (eds) Discursive Approaches to Language Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53134-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53134-6_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-53133-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-53134-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)