Abstract
The paper analyzes the impact of inter-municipal cooperation on territorial fragmentation on the basis of a European comparison of the cases of Slovakia, Slovenia, and the German Land Brandenburg. While in Brandenburg all IMC types utilized intensively, in Slovakia quasi-regional governments and service delivery organizations and in Slovenia only the latter ones are dominant. In general, the IMC may be a challenge to a sub-optimal municipal size and to overcome shortcomings associated with territorial fragmentation. Under favorable conditions as in Brandenburg, the IMC has led to territorial consolidation. Under unfavorable conditions, as in Slovakia and Slovenia, it may even be inefficient, opportunistic and sustain territorial fragmentation as well as prevent any amalgamation reform.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baldersheim, H., and L.E. Rose. 2010. Territorial choice: The politics of boundaries and borders. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bel, G., X. Fageda, and M. Mur. 2014. Does cooperation reduce service delivery costs? Evidence from residential solid waste services. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24(1): 85–107.
Bogumil, J., and S. Kuhlmann (eds.). 2010. Kommunale Aufgabenwahrnehmung im Wandel—Kommunalisierung, Regionalisierung und Territorialreform in Deutschland und Europa. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Büchner, Ch., and J. Franzke. 2001. Kreisgebietsreform in Brandenburg: Leitbild, Implementation und eine Zwischenbilanz nach sechs Jahren. In Reorganisationsstrategien in Wirtschaft und Verwaltung, ed. T. Edeling, W. Jann, and D. Wagner, 229–244. Berlin: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Carr, J.B., and R. Feiock (eds.). 2004. City-county consolidation and its alternatives: Reshaping the local government landscape. New York: Sharpe.
Denters, B., M. Goldsmith, A. Ladner, P.E. Mouritzen, and L.E. Rose. 2014. Size and local democracy. Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Dollery, B., and A. Akimov. 2008. Are shared services a panacea for Australian local government? A critical note on Australian and international empirical evidence. International Review of Public Administration 12(2): 89–102.
Ermini, B., and R. Santolini. 2010. Local expenditure in Italian municipalities. Do local council partnerships make a difference? Local Government Studies 36(5): 655–677.
Hertzog, R. 2010. Inter-municipal co-operation: A viable alternative to territorial amalgamation? In Territorial consolidation reforms in Europe, ed. P. Swianiewicz, 289–312. Budapest: OSI/LGI.
Hulst, J.R., and A.J.G.M. van Montfort. 2012. Institutional features of inter-municipal co-operation: Cooperative arrangements and their national contexts. Public Policy and Administration 27(2): 121–144.
Hulst, J.R., A.J.G.M. van Montfort, A. Haveri, J. Airaksinen, and J. Kelly. 2009. Institutional shifts in inter-municipal service delivery: An analysis of development in eight Western European countries. Public Organization Review 9(3): 263–285.
Keating, M. 1995. Size, efficiency and democracy: Consolidation, fragmentation and public choice. In Theories of urban politics, ed. D. Judge et al., 117–134. London: Sage.
Kelly, J. 2007. The curious absence of inter-municipal cooperation in England. Public Policy and Administration 22(3): 319–334.
Klimovský, D. 2010. Territorial consolidation and inter-communal co-operation at the local level in the Slovak Republic. In Territorial consolidation reforms in Europe, ed. P. Swianiewicz, 237–253. Budapest: OSI/LGI.
Klimovský, D. 2014. Inter-municipal cooperation in Slovakia: The case of regions with highly fragmented municipal structure. Novo mesto: Faculty of Organization Studies.
Klimovský, D., O. Mejerė, J. Mikolaityte, U. Pinterič, and D. Šaparniene. 2014. Inter-municipal cooperation in Lithuania and Slovakia: Does size structure matter? Lex Localis—Journal of Local Self-Government 12(3): 643–658.
Koprić, I. 2012. Consolidation, fragmentation, and special statuses of local authorities in Europe. Croatian and Comparative Public Administration 12(4): 1175–1196.
Kuhlmann, S., and H. Wollmann. 2014. Introduction to comparative public administration: Administrative systems and reforms in Europe. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Lackowska, M. 2009. Why is voluntary co-operation condemned to failure? Reflections on the polish and German background. Lex Localis—Journal of Local Self-Government 7(4): 347–369.
Landtag Brandenburg. 2014. Abschlussbericht der Enquete-Kommission 5/2 „Kommunal- und Landesverwaltung—bürgernah, effektiv und zukunftsfest—Brandenburg 2020“. On-line at: http://www.landtag.brandenburg.de/media_fast/5701/Drs_5_8000.pdf.
Mäeltsemees, S., M. Lõhmus, and J. Ratas. 2013. Inter-municipal cooperation: Possibility for advancing local democracy and subsidiarity in Estonia. Halduskultuur—Administrative Culture 14(1): 73–97.
Sancton, A., R. James, and R. Ramsay. 2000. Amalgamation vs. inter-municipal cooperation: Financing local and infrastructure services. Toronto: ICURR Press.
Savitch, H.V., and R. Vogel. 2000. Paths to new regionalism. State and Local Government Review 32(3): 158–168.
Skaburskis, A. 2004. Goals for municipal restructuring plans. In Redrawing local government boundaries: An international study of politics, procedures, and decisions, ed. J. Meligrana, 38–55. Toronto: University of British Columbia Press.
Soguel, N.C. 2006. The inter-municipal cooperation in Switzerland and the trend towards amalgamation. Urban Public Economics Review 6: 169–188.
Sørensen, R.J. 2007. Does dispersed public ownership impair efficiency? The case of re-fuse collection in Norway. Public Administration 85(4): 1045–1058.
Spicer, Z. 2012. Post-amalgamation politics: How does consolidation impact community decision-making? Canadian Journal of Urban Research 21(2): 90–111.
Statistical Office of Republic of Slovenia, Ljubljana Regional overview. Online at: http://www.stat.si/StatWeb/en/field-overview?id=20&headerbar=16.
Swianiewicz, P. (ed.). 2002. Consolidation or fragmentation? The size of local governments in Central and Eastern Europe. Budapest: OSI/LGI.
Swianiewicz, P. 2010. If territorial fragmentation is a problem, is amalgamation a solution? An East European perspective. Local Government Studies 36(2): 183–203.
Tavares, A.F., and P.J. Camões. 2007. Local service delivery choices in Portugal: A political transaction costs framework. Local Government Studies 33(4): 535–553.
Teles, F. 2014. Local government and the bailout: Reform singularities in Portugal. European Urban and Regional Studies (pub online 27. January 2014) 1–13.
Tichý, D. 2005. Združovanie obcí ako predpoklad rýchlejšieho rozvoja samospráv a regiónov. Ekonomický časopis 53(4): 364–382.
Tiebout, Ch M. 1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. The Journal of Political Economy 64(5): 416–424.
Wollmann, H. 2010. Comparing two logics of interlocal cooperation: The cases of France and Germany. Urban Affairs Review 46(2): 263–292.
Zafra-Gómez, J.L., D. Prior, A.M. Plata-Díaz, and A.M. López-Hernández. 2013. Reducing costs in times of crisis: Delivery forms in small and medium sized local governments’ waste management services’. Public Administration 91(1): 51–68.
Žohar, F. 2014. Delovanje skupnih občinskih uprav v Sloveniji. Ljubljana: Skupnost občin Slovenija, Združenje občin Slovenje & Ministrstvo za notranje zadeve in javno upravo.
Žohar, F. 2015. Avtonomnost občin in medobčinsko povezovanje z namenom spodbujanja regionalnega razvoja. PhD thesis, School of Advanced Social Studies, Nova Gorica.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Franzke, J., Klimovský, D., Pinterič, U. (2016). Does Inter-Municipal Cooperation Lead to Territorial Consolidation? A Comparative Analysis of Selected European Cases in Times of Crisis. In: Kuhlmann, S., Bouckaert, G. (eds) Local Public Sector Reforms in Times of Crisis. Governance and Public Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52548-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52548-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-52547-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52548-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)