Abstract
Probation services provide a wide variety of tasks. In England and Wales, for example, besides the supervision of offenders who are sentenced to community penalties by the courts, they are involved in crime prevention initiatives, carry out bail information work, work with the police in Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements, have a presence in prisons, work with the victims of crime and with those released from custody, and prepare reports for the courts which are intended to provide sentencers with information which will assist in the sentencing process. While the bulk of probation research has focused on its work with offenders, it can be argued that the provision of reports for the courts is—in some ways—the most significant task. Pre-sentence reports (PSRs) are the primary point of contact with sentencers, who are the main customers for probation work; they are a key probation task in many countries, although they may have different names. This chapter will explore the role of probation staff in advising on sentencing and in promoting community sanctions and measures. It will, for the most part, focus on England and Wales but the implications of the discussion will be relevant to any countries where PSRs (or their equivalents) are prepared by the probation service.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beyens, K., & Scheirs, V. (2010). Encounters of a different kind. Punishment and Society, 12(3), 309–328.
Canton, R. (2011). Probation: Working with offenders. London: Routledge.
Carter, P. (2003). Managing offenders, reducing crime. London: Strategy Unit.
Carter, R. M., & Wilkins, L. T. (1967). Some factors in sentencing policy. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 58(4), 503–514.
Davies, M. (1974). Social inquiry for the courts: An examination of the current position in England and Wales. British Journal of Criminology, 14, 18–33.
Gelsthorpe, L., & Raynor, P. (1995). Quality and effectiveness in probation officers’ reports to sentencers. British Journal of Criminology, 35(2), 188–200.
Gelsthorpe, L., Raynor, P., & Robinson, G. (2010). Pre-sentence reports in England and Wales: Changing discourses of need, risk and quality. In F. McNeill, P. Raynor, & C. Trotter (Eds.), Offender supervision: New directions in theory, research and practice. Abingdon: Willan.
Haines, K., & Morgan, R. (2007). Services before trial and sentence: Achievement, decline and potential. In L. Gelsthorpe & R. Morgan (Eds.), Handbook of probation. Cullompton: Willan.
Home Office. (1910). Report of the Departmental Committee on the Probation of Offenders Act, 1907. London: HMSO.
Home Office. (1961). Report of the Interdepartmental Committee on the Business of the Criminal Courts. London: HMSO.
Home Office. (1992a). National standards for the supervision of offenders in the community. London: Home Office.
Home Office. (1992b). Probation statistics England and Wales 1990. London: Home Office.
Home Office. (2001). Probation statistics England and Wales 1999. London: Home Office.
Le Mesurier, L. (Ed.). (1935). A handbook of probation and social work of the courts. London: National Association of Probation Officers.
Mair, G., & May, C. (1995). Practitioners’ views of the criminal justice act: A survey of criminal justice agencies (Research and Planning Unit Paper 91). London: Home Office.
May, C. (1995). Measuring the satisfaction of courts with the probation service (Home Office Research Study 144). London: Home Office.
May, C. (1997). Magistrates’ views of the probation service (RSD Research Findings 48). London: Home Office.
McWilliams, W. (1986). The English probation system and the diagnostic ideal. Howard Journal, 25(4), 24–60.
National Probation Service. (2003). Magistrates’ perceptions of the probation service. London: National Probation Service.
Tata, C. (2010). A sense of justice: The role of pre-sentence reports in the production (and disruption) of guilt and guilty pleas. Punishment and Society, 12(3), 23–61.
Tata, C., Burns, N., Halliday, S., Hutton, N., & McNeill, F. (2008). Assisting and advising the sentencing decision process. British Journal of Criminology, 48, 835–855.
Taylor, E., Clarke, R., & McArt, D. (2013). The intensive alternative to custody: “Selling” sentences and satisfying judicial concerns. Probation Journal, 61(1), 4–9.
Wandall, R. H. (2010). Resisting risk assessment? Pre-sentence reports and individualized sentencing in Denmark. Punishment and Society, 12(3), 32–47.
Unless otherwise noted, all figures used in this chapter are taken from Ministry of Justice statistics available at https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ministry-of-justice/about/statistics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mair, G. (2016). What Is the Impact of Probation in Advising Sentencing and Promoting Community Sanctions and Measures?. In: McNeill, F., Durnescu, I., Butter, R. (eds) Probation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51982-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51982-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-51980-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-51982-5
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)