Skip to main content

What Is the Impact of Probation in Advising Sentencing and Promoting Community Sanctions and Measures?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Probation

Abstract

Probation services provide a wide variety of tasks. In England and Wales, for example, besides the supervision of offenders who are sentenced to community penalties by the courts, they are involved in crime prevention initiatives, carry out bail information work, work with the police in Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements, have a presence in prisons, work with the victims of crime and with those released from custody, and prepare reports for the courts which are intended to provide sentencers with information which will assist in the sentencing process. While the bulk of probation research has focused on its work with offenders, it can be argued that the provision of reports for the courts is—in some ways—the most significant task. Pre-sentence reports (PSRs) are the primary point of contact with sentencers, who are the main customers for probation work; they are a key probation task in many countries, although they may have different names. This chapter will explore the role of probation staff in advising on sentencing and in promoting community sanctions and measures. It will, for the most part, focus on England and Wales but the implications of the discussion will be relevant to any countries where PSRs (or their equivalents) are prepared by the probation service.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beyens, K., & Scheirs, V. (2010). Encounters of a different kind. Punishment and Society, 12(3), 309–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canton, R. (2011). Probation: Working with offenders. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, P. (2003). Managing offenders, reducing crime. London: Strategy Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, R. M., & Wilkins, L. T. (1967). Some factors in sentencing policy. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 58(4), 503–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M. (1974). Social inquiry for the courts: An examination of the current position in England and Wales. British Journal of Criminology, 14, 18–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelsthorpe, L., & Raynor, P. (1995). Quality and effectiveness in probation officers’ reports to sentencers. British Journal of Criminology, 35(2), 188–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelsthorpe, L., Raynor, P., & Robinson, G. (2010). Pre-sentence reports in England and Wales: Changing discourses of need, risk and quality. In F. McNeill, P. Raynor, & C. Trotter (Eds.), Offender supervision: New directions in theory, research and practice. Abingdon: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines, K., & Morgan, R. (2007). Services before trial and sentence: Achievement, decline and potential. In L. Gelsthorpe & R. Morgan (Eds.), Handbook of probation. Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (1910). Report of the Departmental Committee on the Probation of Offenders Act, 1907. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (1961). Report of the Interdepartmental Committee on the Business of the Criminal Courts. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (1992a). National standards for the supervision of offenders in the community. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (1992b). Probation statistics England and Wales 1990. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (2001). Probation statistics England and Wales 1999. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Mesurier, L. (Ed.). (1935). A handbook of probation and social work of the courts. London: National Association of Probation Officers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, G., & May, C. (1995). Practitioners’ views of the criminal justice act: A survey of criminal justice agencies (Research and Planning Unit Paper 91). London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, C. (1995). Measuring the satisfaction of courts with the probation service (Home Office Research Study 144). London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, C. (1997). Magistrates’ views of the probation service (RSD Research Findings 48). London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, W. (1986). The English probation system and the diagnostic ideal. Howard Journal, 25(4), 24–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Probation Service. (2003). Magistrates’ perceptions of the probation service. London: National Probation Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tata, C. (2010). A sense of justice: The role of pre-sentence reports in the production (and disruption) of guilt and guilty pleas. Punishment and Society, 12(3), 23–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tata, C., Burns, N., Halliday, S., Hutton, N., & McNeill, F. (2008). Assisting and advising the sentencing decision process. British Journal of Criminology, 48, 835–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, E., Clarke, R., & McArt, D. (2013). The intensive alternative to custody: “Selling” sentences and satisfying judicial concerns. Probation Journal, 61(1), 4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wandall, R. H. (2010). Resisting risk assessment? Pre-sentence reports and individualized sentencing in Denmark. Punishment and Society, 12(3), 32–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Unless otherwise noted, all figures used in this chapter are taken from Ministry of Justice statistics available at https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ministry-of-justice/about/statistics.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mair, G. (2016). What Is the Impact of Probation in Advising Sentencing and Promoting Community Sanctions and Measures?. In: McNeill, F., Durnescu, I., Butter, R. (eds) Probation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51982-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51982-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-51980-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-51982-5

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics