Skip to main content

Redundancy and Information in Explanatory Voice-Ins and Voice-Offs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Sound Design and Music in Screen Media

Abstract

Automated dialogue replacement (ADR) is a standard post-production technique for adding spoken sound in contemporary film and television. This chapter discusses ADR’s role in the production of a coherent match of voice, sound and vision that is crucial to the mainstream Hollywood style, in particular in technoscientific genres, where much of the action takes place on screens inside the narrative. The sounds made by computer screens and computer operators, as well as the sounds attributed to babies, are examined in particular. The concept of enunciation is used to explain the interplay of redundancy, information, communicative acts, and repetition in the production of meaning in several film and television genres, especially in productions released in the digital era.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

eBook
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 32.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aho, K.A. (2009) Heidegger’s Neglect of the Body (Albany: SUNY Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman, R. (1980) ‘Moving Lips: Cinema as Ventriloquism’, Yale French Studies, 60, 67–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckland W. (ed.) (2009), Puzzle Films: Complex Storytelling in Contemporary Cinema (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chion M. (1999) The Voice in Cinema, trans. by C. Gorbman (New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cubitt, S. (2004) The Cinema Effect (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1989) Cinema 2: The Time-Image, trans. by H. Tomlinson (London: Athlone).

    Google Scholar 

  • Doane, M.A. (1980) ‘The Voice in the Cinema: The Articulation of Body and Space’, Yale French Studies, 60, 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolar, M. (2006) A Voice and Nothing More (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Flinn, C. (1992) Strains of Utopia: Gender, Nostalgia, and Hollywood Film Music (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, M. (2005) Media Ecologies: Materialist Energies in Art and Technoculture (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunning, T. (1986) ‘The Cinema of Attraction: Early Film, Its Spectator, and the Avant-Garde’, Wide Angle, Vol. 8, Nos. 3–4 (Fall), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1980) ‘Hölderlin’s “Germanium und Der Rhein”’, ed. by S. Ziegler (Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. (1995) The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics: World, Finitude, Solitude (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoss, R. and S. Applebaum (2014a) ‘Post-Production Documents’, Super Mario Bros. The Movie Archive http://www.smbmovie.com/SMBArchive/postproduction/postprod.htm#adr, 16 June 2015.

  • Hoss, R. and S. Applebaum (2014b) ‘ADR Notes’, Super Mario Bros. The Movie Archive http://www.smbmovie.com/SMBArchive/postproduction/docs/04-SMB_R&B_ADR_Notes_1-4-93.pdf, 16 June 2015.

  • Jakobson, R. (1985) ‘Closing Statement: Linguistics and Poetics’ in R. E. Innis (ed.) Semiotics: An Introductory Reader (London: Hutchinson), 150–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, F. (1993) ‘The Synoptic Chandler’ in J. Copjec (ed.) Shades of Noir (London: Verso), 33–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittler, F. (1999) Gramophone, Film, Typewriter, trans. by G. Winthrop-Young and M. Wutz (Stanford: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemmens, P. (2011) ‘“This System Does Not Produce Pleasure Anymore”: An Interview with Bernard Stiegler’, Krisis 1, 33–41 (www.krisis.eu).

  • Manovich, L. (2001) The Language of New Media (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. (2013) Software Takes Command (London: Bloomsbury Academic).

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, C. (1974) Film Language: A Semiotics of the Cinema, trans. by M. Taylor (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. (2016) Impersonal Enunciation, or the Site of Film, trans. by Cormac Deane (New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, L. (2006) Death 24x a Second: Stillness and the Moving Image (London: Reaktion).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nigawara, S., M. Fukai, M. Sugihara, K. Furudate and H. Nagai (1994) Control System for an Industrial Plant, a Display System for such a Control System, and a Method of Controlling an Industrial Plant, United States Patent no. 5,353,400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulin, S.D. (2000) ‘Richard Wagner and the Fantasy of Cinematic Unity: The Idea of the Gesamtkunstwerk in the History and Theory of Film Music’ in J. Buhler, C. Flinn and D. Neumeyer (eds) (2000) Music and Cinema (Hanover, NH: University Press of New England), 58–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin, J. (2000) The Age of Access: The New Culture of Hypercapitalism, where All of Life is a Paid-for Experience (New York: J. P. Tarcher/Putnam).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheurer, T.E. (2008) Music and Mythmaking in Film: Genre and the Role of the Composer (Jefferson, NC: McFarland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Serres, M. (1982) The Parasite, trans. by L. C. Shehr, (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C.E. (1948) ‘A Mathematical Theory of Communication’, The Bell System Technical Journal, 27 (July and October), 379–423; 623–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaviro, S. (2010) Postcinematic Affect (London: Zero).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobchack, V. (2005) ‘When the Ear Dreams: Dolby Digital and the Imagination of Sound’, Film Quarterly, Vol. 58, No. 4 (Summer), 2–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiegler, B. (1994) Technics and Time 1: The Fault of Epimetheus (Stanford: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. (2011) Technics and Time 3: Cinematic Time and the Question of Malaise (Stanford: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Watterson B. (1986) Calvin and Hobbes (21 December). Syndicated in multiple publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, D.D., E. S. Patterson and E. M. Roth (2002) ‘Can We Ever Escape from Data Overload? A Cognitive Systems Diagnosis’, Cognition, Technology, and Work, Vol. 4, No. 1, 22–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (2006) How to Read Lacan (London: Granta).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Deane, C. (2016). Redundancy and Information in Explanatory Voice-Ins and Voice-Offs. In: Greene, L., Kulezic-Wilson, D. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Sound Design and Music in Screen Media. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51680-0_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics