Abstract
When most people think of online relationships, their mind usually summons the spectre of countless “cat-fish” and internet “predator” stories which abound in the tabloid media. These cautionary tales would lead us to believe that the online environment produces relationships that are damaging and often misleading due to our inability to clearly ascertain who we are dealing with in a physical sense. It is this sense of the unknown, the anonymity of others, which has cemented popular opinion of online relationships as somehow inferior, less intimate and more fleeting than offline relationships (Hart 2015). Yet, our research shows that this is not necessarily the case. Instead, our research posits, as others have before us (e.g. see Chambers 2013) that the relationships formed between members of online communities, such as Stronger Together, are highly supportive, extremely intimate and as enduring as those formed offline. Furthermore, these relationships can have far reaching positive impacts, both emotionally and psychologically for those seeking support. Findings such as these have challenged how we conceptualise “intimacy” and “relationships” (Chambers 2013) and suggest that we may need to move towards new understandings of these terms which emphasise the value individuals derive from their online relationships.
“To end this journal, I just want to say THANK YOU to all you ladies who have been here for me, supporting me and giving me advice. I really do appreciate all of it, and all of you!” Joan
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barak, A., Boniel-Nissim, M., & Suler, J. (2008). Fostering Empowerment in Online Support Groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 1867–1883.
Bauman, Z. (2003). Liquid Love: On the Frailty of Human Bonds. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1995). The Normal Chaos of Love. Oxford: Polity Press.
Campos-Castillo, C., & Hitlin, S. (2013). Copresence: Revisiting a Building Block for Social Interaction Theories. Sociological Theory, 31(2), 168–192.
Chambers, D. (2013). Social Media and Personal Relationships: Online Intimacies and Personal Friendships. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dickerson, F. B. (1998). Strategies That Foster Empowerment. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 5(2), 255–275.
Giddens, A. (1992). The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Groos, N. (2005). The Detraditionalization of Intimacy Reconsidered. Sociological Theory, 23(3), 286–311.
Hart, M. (2015). Youth Intimacy on Tumblr: A Pilot Study. Young, 23(3), 193–207.
Lapidot-Lefler, N., & Barak, A. (2015). The Benign Online Disinhibition Effect: Could Situational Factors Induce Self-Disclosure and Prosocial Behaviors? Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 9(2), Article 3, 1–19.
Lieberman, M. A., & Goldstein, B. A. (2006). Not All Negative Emotions Are Equal: The Role of Emotional Expression in Online Support Groups for Women with Breast Cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 15(2), 160–168.
Suler, J. (2004). The Online Disinhibition Effect. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(3), 321–326.
van Uden-Kraan, C. F., Drossaert, C. H. C., Taal, E., Seydel, E. R., & van Laar, M. A. F. (2008). Self-Reported Differences in Empowerment Between Lurkers and Posters in Online Patient Support Groups. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 10(2), e18.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Billett, P. (2019). Finding Support in the Online World. In: Infertility and Intimacy in an Online Community. Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-44981-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-44981-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-44980-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-44981-8
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)