Skip to main content

Animal Abuse Resulting from Wildlife Habitat Destruction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave International Handbook of Animal Abuse Studies

Abstract

This chapter explores the ways in which habitat destruction impacts upon the health and well-being of nonhuman animals. It begins by discussing the importance of, and threats to, biodiversity and in particular the negative consequences of deforestation and habitat loss on animal and plant species. The multiple reasons for deforestation are examined, including the introduction of ‘flex crops’ and greater reliance upon genetically modified organisms as part of agribusiness. The next part reviews the significance of pollution as this relates to the degradation of air, land and water habitats. Contamination comes in many forms, one of the most harmful of which is the emergent phenomenon of microplastics, which are now ubiquitous in the planet’s oceans. The third part of the chapter considers debates over preservation and conservation of habitat, and the implications these debates hold for responding to threats to habitat as these pertain to particular species of nonhuman animals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, E. (2004). Animal rights and the values of nonhuman life. In C. Sustein & M. Nussbaum (Eds.), Animal rights: current debates and new directions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Broadcasting Corporation [ABC] (2015, October 19). Southeast Asia’s haze: find out what is behind the choking smoke covering Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore. ABC News.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Broadcasting Corporation [ABC] (2015, October 22). South-East Asian haze strikes the Pacific as fires exceed greenhouse gas output of the US’. ABC News.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Broadcasting Corporation [ABC] (2015, November 2). Borneo’s orang-utans forced out of habitat by haze from Indonesian peat blaze. ABC News.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beirne, P. (2009). Confronting animal abuse: law, criminology, and human-animal relationships. New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisschop, L. (2015). Governance of the illegal trade in e-waste and tropical timber: case studies on transnational environmental crime. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boekhout van Solinge, T. (2008a). Crime, conflicts and ecology in Africa. In R. Sullund (Ed.), Global harms: ecological crime and speciesism. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boekhout van Solinge, T. (2008b). The land of the orangutan and the bird of paradise under threat. In R. Sullund (Ed.), Global harms: ecological crime and speciesism. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boekhout van Solinge, T. (2010a). Equatorial deforestation as a harmful practice and a criminological issue. In R. White (Ed.), Global environmental harm: criminological perspectives. Devon: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boekhout van Solinge, T. (2010b). Deforestation crimes and conflicts in the amazon. Critical Criminology, 18, 263–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boekhout van Solinge, T. & Kuijpers, K. (2013). The amazon rainforest: a green criminological perspective. In N. South & A. Brisman (Eds.), Routledgeinternational handbook of green criminology. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borras Jr., S., Franco, J., & Wang, C. (2013). The challenge of global governance of land grabbing: changing international agricultural context and competing political views and strategies. Globalizations, 10(1), 161–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brisman, A., & South, N. (2013). Resources, wealth, power, crime and conflict. In R. Walters, D. Westerhuis, T. Wyatt (Eds.), Emerging issues in green criminology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brisman, A., South, N., & White, R. (Eds.) (2015). Environmental crime and social conflict: contemporary and emerging issues. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, A., Gay, S., & Kavallari, A. (2012). The compatibility of EU biofuel policies with global sustainability and the WTO. The World Economy, 35(6), 784–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, K., Hogg, R., & McIntosh, A. (2011). Resource boom underbelly: the criminological impact of mining development. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 44(3), 335–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caughley, J., Bomford, M., & McNee, A. (1996). Use of wildlife by indigenous Australians: issues and concepts. In M. Bomford & J. Caughley (Eds.), Sustainable use of wildlife by aboriginal peoples and Torres strait islanders. Canberra: Bureau of Resource Sciences, Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cazaux, G. (1999). Beauty and the beast: animal abuse from a non-speciesist criminological perspective. Crime, Law and Social Change, 31, 105–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, C., Gerasimchuk, I., Birdle, R., Moerenhout, T., Asmelash, E., & Laan, T. (2013). Biofuels—at what cost? A review of costs and benefits of EU biofuels policies. Manitoba: International Institute for Sustainable Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devalle, B., & Sessions, G. (1985). Deep ecology: living as if nature mattered. Layton, UT: Gibbs Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engdahl, F. (2007). Seeds of destruction: the hidden agenda of genetic manipulation. Montreal: Global Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeland, S. (2015). Addressing the intentional destruction of the environment during warfare under the Rome statute of the international criminal court. Cambridge: Intersentia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Witness (2013). Rubber Barons: how Vietnamese companies and international financiers are driving a land grabbing crisis in Cambodia and Laos. London: Global Witness.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenpeace (2014, March 31). What does the IPCC WGII report say on forests?Greenpeace briefing. greenpeace.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, D. 1975. Property, authority and the criminal law. In D. Hay, P. Linebaugh, J.G. Rule. E.P. Thompson and C. Winslow, (Eds.), Albion’s Fatal Tree: Crime and Society in Eighteenth Century England. Harmondsworth: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2013, September 27). Working group I contribution to the IPCC fifth assessment report climate change 2013: the physical science basis: summary for policymakers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khagram, S. (2004). Dams and development: transnational struggles for water and power. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, A. (2006). The unifying role of harm in environmental law. Wisconsin Law Review, 3, 898–985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M., Long, M., & Stretesky, P. (2015). Anthropogenic development drives species to be endangered: capitalism and the decline of species. In R. Sollund (Ed.), Green harms and crimes: critical criminology in a changing world. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macaulay, C. (2016). Species on the move worldwide. The Mercury, Hobart, pp.14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, K. 2013. Scotland has the most inequitable land ownership in the West. Why? The Guardian, 10 August 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, C. (2005). Radical ecology: the search for a liveable world. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. (2008, July). A note on rising food prices. World Bank policy research working paper no. 4682. The World Bank, Development Prospects Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol, H. (2013). ‘A Gift from the Tropics to the World’: power, harm, and palm oil. In R. Walters, D. Westerhuis, T. Wyatt (Eds.), Emergingissues in green criminology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, S. (2012). Rich land, wasteland—how coal is killing Australia. Sydney: Pan Macmillan Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naik, A. (2010). Causes of pollution. Buzzle, 22 October 2010. http://www.buzzle.com/articles/causes-of-pollution.html. Accessed 13 January 2012.

  • Park, A. (2015, November 19). 7 things you need to know about GMO Salmon. Time Magazine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellow, D. (2007). Resisting global toxics: transnational movements for environmental justice. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plumwood, V. (2004). Gender, eco-feminism and the environment. In R. White (Ed.), Controversies in environmental sociology. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reliable Plant (2007, November/December). New study favors tree over corn as biofuel source. Accessed 21 January 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robin, M.-M. (2010). The world according to monsanto: pollution, corruption and the control of our food supply. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robyn, L. (2002). Indigenous knowledge and technology. American Indian Quarterly, 26(2), 198–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolston, H. (2010). Wild animals and ethical perspectives. In M. Bekoff (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of animal rights and animal welfare, Volume 2. Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggiero, V., & South, N. (2013). Toxic state–corporate crimes, neo-liberalism and green criminology: the hazards and legacies of the oil, chemical and mineral industries. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 2(2), 12–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sankoff, P., & White, S. (Eds.) (2009). Animal law in Australasia: a new dialogue. Sydney: The Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2010). Global biodiversity outlook 3. Montreal: SCBD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Setiono, B. (2007). Fighting illegal logging and forest-related financial crimes: the anti-money laundering approach. In L. Elliot (Ed.), Transnational environmental crime in the Asia-pacific: a workshop report. Canberra: Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiva, V. (2000). Stolen harvest: the hijacking of the global food supply. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiva, V. (2008). Soil not oil: environmental justice in an age of climate crisis. Brooklyn: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sollund, R. (2012). Speciesism as doxic practice versus valuing difference and plurality. In R. Ellefsen, R. Sollund, & G. Larsen (Eds.), Eco-global crimes: contemporary problems and future challenges. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stretesky, P., Long, M., & Lynch, M. (2014). The treadmill of crime: political economy and green criminology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, W.J., Clout, M., Cote, I., Daszak, P., Depledges, M.H., Fellman, L., et al. (2009). A horizon scan of global conservation issues for 2010. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 25(1), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsing, A. (2005). Friction: an ethnography of global connection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environment Programme (2011). UNEP year book: emerging issues in our global environment 2011. Nairobi, Kenya: UNEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2013). Threats to biodiversity. http://www.unep-wcmc.org/threats-to-biodiversity_52.html. Accessed 4 September 2013.

  • Varkkey, H. (2013). Oil palm plantations and transboundary haze: patronage networks and land licensing in Indonesia’s peatlands. Wetland, 33, 679–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, R. (2005). Crime, bio-agriculture and the exploitation of hunger. British Journal of Criminology, 46(1), 26–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, R. (2010). Toxic atmospheres: air pollution, trade and the politics of regulation. Critical Criminology, 18, 307–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, R. (2011). Eco crime and genetically modified food. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. (2013). Environmental harm: an eco-justice perspective. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • White, R., & Heckenberg, D. (2014). Green criminology: an introduction to the study of environmental harm. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Wide Fund for Nature [WWF] (2014). Living planet report 2014: species and spaces, people and places. (Eds. R. McLellan, L. Iyengar, B. Jeffries, N. Oerlemans). Gland, Switzerland: WWF.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rob White .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

White, R. (2017). Animal Abuse Resulting from Wildlife Habitat Destruction. In: Maher, J., Pierpoint, H., Beirne, P. (eds) The Palgrave International Handbook of Animal Abuse Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-43183-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-43183-7_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-43182-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-43183-7

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics