Skip to main content

Discipline… But Punish!: Foucault, Agamben and Torture Porn’s Thanotopolitical Scaffold

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Screening the Tortured Body
  • 403 Accesses

Abstract

Jigsaw, the villain in the Saw franchise (2004–2010), has gone down in horror history as a merciful murderer, and even as an ordinary citizen in search of a just judiciary system. The general overlooking of Jigsaw’s abuse of the notion of choice as an excuse for retributive punishment is probably a consequence of a serious gap between what the killer sees as a moral crusade and what is ultimately revealed as a complex technology of disciplinary power, torture and thanatopolitical punishment.

In this chapter, I offer an alternative approach to Jigsaw’s games that focuses on his traps and the role of graphic or explicit sequences. Disputing the pedagogic potential of Saw’s philosophy, I propose we might, instead, gain critical insight from turning to the series’ use of visceral images of torture. I argue that an emphasis on the ways in which viewer enjoyment may be found in the encounter with the films’ thanatopolitical spectacles is necessary in order to rearticulate the academic urgency of the most successful franchise in the history of horror. I conclude by suggesting a few of the possible pleasures to be derived from watching Saw and suggesting that an experiential analysis of fictional violence in studies of extreme cinema is desirable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The term, now widely used in specialised publications, was originally coined by David Edelstein (2006). If he initially used it as an umbrella term to describe violent and gory films released up to five years before the publication of his article, torture porn now loosely defines films particularly preoccupied with giving an aesthetic and affective treatment to the portrayal of mutilation. This does not necessarily entail that the films in question necessarily centre around torture, and in the case of Wolf Creek (Greg McLean, 2005) or Borderland (Zev Berman, 2007) torture might be an accessory to the construction of atmospheric suspense or a more general feeling of unease. The most popular exponents of this subgenre of horror are Hostel and the Saw franchise (2004–2010).

  2. 2.

    It is important to note that the director of Funny Games has often expressed the opinion that he did not set out to create a horror film, but an experiment on how to “show the viewer his own position vis-à-vis violence and its portrayal” (Haneke 579). This is interesting for what it might say about torture porn’s self-aware reflectivity.

  3. 3.

    I Spit on Your Grave received a limited theatrical release in the USA, but it was banned in countries like Australia, where the film would have to wait for its DVD release to reach its audience.

  4. 4.

    This gory exaction of violence and its panning by the media is perhaps what has driven recent histories of horror to ignore torture porn or deem it “the worst mainstream Hollywood had to offer” (Rigby 262).

  5. 5.

    See for example, The Texas Chain Saw Massacre (Marcus Nispel, 2003), The Hills Have Eyes (Alexandre Aja, 2006) or The Last House on the Left (Denis Iliadis, 2009). The last decade has even seen films paying direct homage to exploitation cinema, as is the case with Quentin Tarantino and Robert Rodriguez’s Grindhouse (2007).

  6. 6.

    Literature on this abounds, but a good example is Cyndy Hendershot’s reading of 1950s and 60s horror films as cultural negotiations of the reality of the Cold War (2001).

  7. 7.

    Some critics have also challenged this contextualisation of the films. See Colavito 415–6.

  8. 8.

    This formula, wronged man turns vigilante, is not the exclusive domain of torture porn, and television series like Dexter (2006-present) have been quick to develop sympathetic murderer protagonists who justify their actions by telling themselves they only kill “bad people.”

  9. 9.

    The ludic and immersive quality of Saw’s scaffold has not been lost on its producers, and the franchise has spawned highly profitable side-products like the Saw ride in Thorpe Park or two eponymous video games.

  10. 10.

    I am borrowing this term from Agamben, who opposes it to biopolitics. Thanatopolitics are the type of politics more concerned with the monitoring and controlling of death than the policing of forms of life. A perfect example are fascist or extremist regimes like Nazism.

Films Cited

  • A Nightmare on Elm Street, A. Dir. Wes Craven. New Line Cinema, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  • Abominable Dr. Phibes, The (aka Dr. Phibes). Dir. Robert Fuest. Distributors Ltd./MGM EMI/American International England, 1971

  • Blood Feast. Dir. Herschell Gordon Lewis. Box Office Spectaculars, 1963

    Google Scholar 

  • Borderland. Dir. Zev Berman. After Dark Films/Lionsgate, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Captivity. Dir. Roland Joffé. Lionsgate/After Dark Films, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Cube. Dir. Vincenzo Natali. Cineplex Odeon Films/Trimark Pictures, 1997. Film.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funny Games. Dir. Michael Haneke. Attitude Films/Madman Entertainment, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  • Hostel. Dir. Eli Roth. Screen Gems/Lionsgate, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Hills Have Eyes, The. Dir. Alexandre Aja. Fox Searchlight Pictures, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • I Spit on Your Grave. Dir. Steven R. Monroe. Anchor Bay Entertainment, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Last House on the Left, The. Dir. Denis Iliadis. Rogue Pictures, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Saw. Dir. James Wan. Lionsgate, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Saw II. Dir. Darren Lynn Bousman. Lionsgate, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Saw III. Dir. Darren Lynn Bousman. Lionsgate, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • Saw IV. Dir. Darren Lynn Bousman. Lionsgate, 2007. Film.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saw V. Dir. David Hackl. Lionsgate, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Saw VI. Dir. Kevin Greutert. Lionsgate, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Saw 3D (aka Saw: The Final Chapter). Dir. Kevin Greutert. Lionsgate, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Se7en (aka Seven). Dir. David Fincher. New Line Cinema, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  • Strangers, The. Dir. Bryan Bertino. Rogue Pictures, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Texas Chainsaw Massacre, The. Dir. Marcus Nispel. New Line Cinema/Focus Features, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Them (Ils). Dir. David Moreau and Xavier Palud. Metrodome Distribution, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • Tortured, The. Dir. Robert Lieberman. VVS Films, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Turistas (aka Paradise Lost). Dir. John Stockwell. Fox Atomic, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • Unthinkable. Dir. Gregor Jordan. Senator US, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Untraceable. Dir. Gregory Hoblit. Screen Gems, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf Creek. Dir. Greg McLean. Darclight Films/Dimension Films, 2005

    Google Scholar 

Works Cited

  • Agamben, Giorgio. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Trans. Daniel Heller-Roazen. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. What Is an Apparatus? And Other Essays. Trans. David Kishik and Stefan Pedatella. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carolyn, Axelle. It Lives Again!: Horror Movies in the New Millennium. Tolworth: Telos, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, Brigid. Horror. London: Routledge, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colavito, Jason. Knowing Fear: Science, Knowledge, and the Development of the Horror Genre. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derry, Charles. Dark Dreams 2.0: A Psychological History of the Modern Horror Film. Jefferson, NC: McFarland and Company, 2009. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelstein, David. “Now Playing at Your Local Multiplex: Torture Porn.” New York, 28 January 2006. http://nymag.com/movies/features/15622/. [Accessed November 2011].

  • Farley, Jordan. “The Top 20 Horror Villains: 8. Jigsaw.” SFX: Special Horror Edition. Winter 2010, 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. Power: Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, Volume 3. Ed. James D. Faubion, trans. Robert Hurley et al. London and New York: Penguin, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London and New York: Penguin, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977. Ed. Colin Gordon. New York: Random House, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, Jane. “Caught in a Trap and I Can’t Back Out.” The Guardian. 16 October 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haneke, Michael. “Violence and the Media.” In A Companion to Michael Haneke. Ed. Roy Grundmann, 575–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendershot, Cyndy. I Was a Cold War Monster: Horror Films, Eroticism and the Cold Imagination. Madison, WI: University of Chicago Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hills, Matt. “Cutting into Concepts of ‘Reflectionist’ Cinema?: The Saw Frachise and Puzzles of Post-9/11 Horror.” In Horror after 9/11: World of Fear, Cinema of Terror. Ed. Aviva Briefel and Sam J. Miller. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 2011, 107–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntley, Jake. “I Want to Play a Game: How to See Saw.” The Irish Journal of Gothic and Horror Studies, 2007. http://irishgothichorrorjournal.homestead.com/SawHuntley.html. [Accessed November 2011]

  • Kermode, Mark. The Good, the Bad and the Multiplex: What’s Wrong with Modern Movies? London: Random House, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenstein, Adam. “Spectacle Horror and Hostel: Why ‘Torture Porn’ Does Not Exist.” Critical Quarterly, Vol. 53, Issue, 1 (2011): 42–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marriot, James, and Kim Newman. Horror: 333 Films to Scare You to Death. London: Carlton, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Jeremy. “The Justification of Torture-Horror: Retribution and Sadism in Saw, Hostel, and The Devil’s Rejects.” In The Philosophy of Horror. Ed. Thomas Fahy. Lexington, KE: The University Press of Kentucky, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, Kim. Nightmare Movies: Horror on Screen since the 1960s. London, New York, Berlin and Sidney, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penner, Jonathan, Steven Jay Schneider and Paul Duncan. Horror Cinema. Los Angeles: Taschen, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, Jonathan. Studies in Terror: Landmarks of Horror Cinema. Cambridge: Signum, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddell, Calum. Taboo Breakers: 18 Independent Films that Courted Controversy and Created a Legend, from Blood Feast to Hostel. Tolworth: Telos, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisnewski, J. Jeremy Understanding Torture. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aldana-Reyes, X. (2016). Discipline… But Punish!: Foucault, Agamben and Torture Porn’s Thanotopolitical Scaffold. In: de Valk, M. (eds) Screening the Tortured Body. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-39918-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics