Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Identification in frequency domain

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Feedback Control, Nonlinear Systems, and Complexity

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences ((LNCIS,volume 202))

Abstract

In this paper, we describe some of our recent work on identification in frequency domain.

Supported in part by Airforce Office of Scientific Research under contract no. F-49620-93-1-0246DEF and the Army Research Office under grant no. DAAH04-93-G-0012.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. V. M. Adamyan, D. Z. Arov and M. G. Krein, “Analytic properties of Schmidt pairs for a Hankel operator and the generalized Schur-Takagi problem,” Math. Sbornik, vol. 15, pp. 31–73, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. Akçay, G. Gu and P.P. Khargonekar, “A class of algorithms for identification in \(\mathcal{H}_\infty\): Continuous-time case,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 38, pp. 289–294, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. Akçay, G. Gu and P.P. Khargonekar, “Identification in \(\mathcal{H}_\infty\) with nonuniformly spaced frequency response measurements,” International J. of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 4, pp. 613–629, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E.-W. Bai, “Adaptive quantification of model uncertainties by rational approximation,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 36, pp. 441–453, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Chen, C. N. Nett, and M. K. H. Fan, “Worst-case system identification in \(\mathcal{H}_\infty\): validation of a priori information, essentially optimal algorithms, and error bounds,” Proceedings of American Control Conference, pp. 251–257, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Chen and C. N. Nett, “The Carathédory-Fejér problem and \(\mathcal{H}_\infty\) identification: a time domain approach,” preprint.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. O. Flower and S. C. Forge, “Developments in frequency-response determination using schroeder-phased harmonic signals,” The Radio and Electronic Engineer, vol. 51, pp. 226–232, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Friedman and P. P. Khargonekar, “Identification of lightly damped systems using frequency domain techniques,” Proc. IFAC Conference on System Identification, pp. 201–206, 1994. Submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. C. Goodwin, M. Gevers and B. Ninness, “Quantifying the error in estimated transfer functions with application to model selection,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 37, pp. 913–928, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Gu, P. P. Khargonekar and E.B. Lee, “Approximation of infinite dimensional systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. AC-34, pp. 610–618, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. Gu and P. P. Khargonekar, “Linear and nonlinear algorithms for identification in \(\mathcal{H}_\infty\) with error bounds,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 37, pp. 953–963, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. Gu and P. P. Khargonekar, “A class of algorithms for identification in \(\mathcal{H}_\infty\),” Automatica, vol. 28, pp. 199–312, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. Gu and P. P. Khargonekar, “Frequency domain identification of lightly damped systems: The JPL example,” Proc. of American Control Conference, pp. 3052–3057, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. Gu, P. P. Khargonekar and Y. Li, “Robust convergence of two-stage nonlinear algorithms for system identification in \(\mathcal{H}_\infty\),” Systems and Control Letters, vol. 18, pp. 253–263, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. Gu, D. Xiong, and K. Zhou, “Identification in \(\mathcal{H}_\infty\) using Pick's interpolation,” Systems and Control Letters, vol. 20, pp. 263–272, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. G. Hakvoort, “Worst-case system identification in \(\mathcal{H}_\infty\): Error bounds, interpolation, and optimal models,” Internal Report, Delft University of Technology, The NETHERLANDS, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. J. Helmicki, C.A. Jacobson and C.N. Nett, “Control oriented system identification: a worst-case/deterministic approach in \(\mathcal{H}_\infty\),” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 36, pp. 1163–1176, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. J. Helmicki, C. A. Jacobson and C. N. Nett, “Worst-case/deterministic identification in \(\mathcal{H}_\infty\): The continuous-time case,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 37, pp. 604–610, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A.J. Helmicki, C.A. Jacobson, and C.N. Nett, “Identification in \(\mathcal{H}_\infty\): linear algorithms,” Proc. American Control Conference, pp. 2418–2423, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. Kosut and H. Ailing, “Worst case control design from batch least squares,” Proc. American Control Conference, pp. 318–322, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. M. Krause and P.P. Khargonekar, “Parameter identification in the presence of non-parametric dynamic uncertainty,” Automatica, vol. 26, pp. 113–124, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Lau, R.L. Kosut, and S. Boyd, “Parameter set identification of systems with uncertain nonparametric dynamics and disturbances,” Proc. 29th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 3162–3167, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  23. W. Lee, B. D. O. Anderson, and R. Kosut, “On adaptive robust control and control relevant identification,” Proc. American Control Conference, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  24. L. Lin, L. Wang, and G. Zames, “Uncertainty principles and identification n-widths for LTI and slowly varying systems,” Proc. American Control Conference, pp. 296–300, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  25. L. Ljung, System Identification, Theory for the User, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  26. P. M. Mäkilä and J. R. Partington, “Robust identification of strongly stabilizable systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 37, pp. 1709–1716, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  27. S. H. Mo and J. P. Norton, “Parameter-bounding identification algorithms for bounded-noise records,” IEE Proceedings Part D, Control Theory and Applications, vol. 135, pp. 127–132, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  28. Z. Nehari, “On bounded linear forms,” Annals of Mathematics, vol. 65, pp. 153–162, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  29. B. M. Ninness, “Stochastic and deterministic estimation in \(\mathcal{H}_\infty\),” Proc. 33rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 62–67, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  30. P. J. Parker and R. R. Bitmead, “Adaptive frequency response identification,” Proc. 28th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 348–353, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  31. J. R. Partington, “Robust identification in \(\mathcal{H}_\infty\),” J. Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 166, pp. 428–441, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  32. J. R. Partington, “Robust identification and interpolation in \(\mathcal{H}_\infty\), International Journal of Control, vol. 54, pp. 1281–1290, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  33. J. R. Partington, “Algorithms for identification in \(\mathcal{H}_\infty\) with unequally spaced function measurements”, International Journal of Control, vol. 58, pp. 21–32, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  34. J. R. Partington, “Interpolation in normed spaces from the values of linear functionals,” Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, vol. 26, pp. 165–170, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  35. A. Pinkus, n-Widths in Approximation Theory, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  36. K. Poolla, P. P. Khargonekar, A. Tikku, J. Krause, and K. Nagpal, “A time-domain approach to model validation,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 39, pp. 951–959, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  37. K. Poolla and A. Tikku, “Time complexity of worst-case identification,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 39, pp. 944–950, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  38. S. Raman and E. W. Bai, “A linear, robust and convergent interpolatory algorithm for quantifying midel uncertainties,” Systems and Control Letters, vol. 18, pp. 173–178, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  39. C. K. Sanathanan and J. Koerner, “Transfer function synthesis as a ratio of two complex polynomials,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. AC-8, pp. 56–58, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  40. R. J. P. Schrama, “Accurate models for control design: the necessity of an iterative scheme,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 37, pp. 991–993, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  41. R. S. Smith and J. C. Doyle, “Towards a methodology for robust parameter identification,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. AC-37, pp. 942–952, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  42. R. Tempo, “IBC: a working tool for robust parameter estimation,” Proc. American Control Conference, pp. 237–240, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  43. D. N. C. Tse, M. A. Dahleh, and J. N. Tsitsiklis, “Optimal Asymptotic Identification under Bounded Disturbances”, Proc. American Control Conference, pp. 1786–1787, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  44. T. van den Boom, MIMO-systems identification for \(\mathcal{H}_\infty\) robust control: A frequency domain approach with minimum error bounds, Ph. D. Thesis, Eindhoven University, the NETHERLANDS.

    Google Scholar 

  45. J. C. Willems, “From time series to linear system — Parts 1, 2, 3,” Automatica, vol. 22–23, 1986–87.

    Google Scholar 

  46. R. C. Younce and C. E. Rohrs, “Identification with non-parametric uncertainty,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 37, pp. 715–128, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  47. G. Zames, “On the metric complexity of causal linear systems: ε-entropy and ε-dimension for continuous time,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. AC-24, pp. 222–230, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Z. Zang, R. Bitmead, and M. Gevers, “\(\mathcal{H}_ \in\) Iterative model refinement and control robustness enhancement,” Proc. 30th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 279–284, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  49. T. Zhou and H. Kimura, “Identification for robust control in time domain,” Systems and Control Letters, vol. 20, pp. 167–178, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  50. A. Zygmund, Trigonometric Series, Cambridge University Press, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Louisiana State University, 70803-5901, Baton Rouge, LA

    Guoxiang Gu

  2. Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, The University of Michigan, 48109-2122, Ann Arbor, MI

    Pramod P. Khargonekar

Authors
  1. Guoxiang Gu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pramod P. Khargonekar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Bruce Allen Francis Allen Robert Tannenbaum

Additional information

In honor of Professor George Zames on his 60th birthday

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gu, G., Khargonekar, P.P. (1995). Identification in frequency domain. In: Francis, B.A., Tannenbaum, A.R. (eds) Feedback Control, Nonlinear Systems, and Complexity. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol 202. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0027673

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0027673

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-19943-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39364-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation