Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Responsibility to Protect (RtoP): Norm Institutionalisation, Issues and Challenges

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Africa's Engagement with the Responsibility to Protect in the 21st Century

  • 118 Accesses

Abstract

The Responsibility to Protect (RtoP) is one of a number of frameworks formulated by the more powerful members of the international community to protect categories of civilian populations facing existential threats. Yet unlike frameworks like the Geneva Convention and its additional protocols, the RtoP struggles to attain the status of an international norm and law binding on state actors in the international fora. At the root of the RtoP’s challenges is its moralistic but ultimately threatening attempt to re-define traditional notions of sovereignty from a sacrosanct and inviolable right of states as agreed under international law to a responsibility and privilege sustained only by the competence and alacrity of the so-called sovereign states to shield their citizens from egregious events, failure of which circumvents sovereignty opening the state to foreign/international armed intervention for the sake of stopping or preventing enormous gamut of civilian suffering. Emerging from this are intertwined issues interacting to hinder universal support and acceptance of the RtoP by state actors in the international system. These intervening issues are numerous but generally revolve around (1) definition of what the doctrine aims to do, can do and should do (ii) fear of its abuse by powerful states and (i) operational outcomes, all of which have polarized the international base required to institutionalise the RtoP into international norm and law. The nature of interaction of these issues necessarily makes them complex. The main engagement of this chapter therefore, is not so much to suggest recommendations to improve the RtoP’s chances of consolidation and institutionalisation, as it is to provide a guide through, and simplify these issues, thus bringing greater and possibly, new understanding to the current state of the RtoP doctrine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abomo, P. E. T. (2016). The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) and United States intervention in the Libyan civil war (2011) (Doctoral dissertation, Loyola University Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Acharya, A., & Buzan, B. (2007). Preface: Why Is There No Non-Western IR Theory: Reflections on and from Asia. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 7(3), 285–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akgül, P. (2021). Chapter 10 Non-Western International Relations Theories. In Critical Approaches to International Relations. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004470507.011

  • Axworthy, L. (2011, August 23). In Libya, We Move Toward a More Humane World. Globe and Mail. Available at: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/opinion/in-libya-we-move-towarda-more:humane-world/article2138221/

  • Beier, J. M. (2005). International Relations in Uncommon Places: Indigeneity, Cosmology, and the Limits of International Theory. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, A. J. (2010). The responsibility to protect—five years on. Ethics & International Affairs, 24(2), 143–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, A. J., & Davies, S. E. (2009). The Responsibility to Protect in the Asia-Pacific Region. Security Dialogue, 40(6), 547–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010609349907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, A. J., & Williams, P. D. (2011). The New Politics of Protection? Cote d’Ivoire, Libya and the Responsibility to Protect. International Affairs, 87(4), 825–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belloni, R. (2006). The Tragedy of Darfur and the Limits of the ‘Responsibility to Protect’. Ethnopolitics, 84(4), 327–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, D., & Michaelsen, C. (2012). Intervention in Libya: Another Nail in the Coffin for the Responsibility-to-Protect? International Community Law Review, 14(4), 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1163/18719732-12341235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaney, D. L., & Tickner, A. B. (2017). International Relations in the Prison of Colonial Modernity. International Relations (London), 31(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117817691349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carens, J. H. (1987). Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders. The Review of Politics, 49(2), 251–273. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500033817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E. H. (1946). The Twenty Years Crisis, 1919–1939. Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, J. (1977). Address by President Jimmy Carter to the UN General Assembly. US Department of State. Available at: https://2009-2017.state.gov/p/to/potusunea/207272.htm#text-Thur%2C%20no%20member%20%2Oths.anx2%20pet%20of%20the%20world. Accessed: March 8, 2022.

  • Chandler, D. (2009). Unravelling the Paradox of ‘The Responsibility to Protect’ Irish Studies in International Affairs, Vol. 20, pp. 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cincurovaara, S. (2022). Ukraine’s Kids Are Literally on the Front Line. Foreign Policy, Available at: https://forcimpolicy.com/2022/02/17/ukraine-russia-crisis-invasion:children-kindergarten-school/

  • Finnemore, M. (1996). National Interests in International Society. Comell University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, R. (2011).Beyond Libya: A World Ready to Respond to Mass Violence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luck, E. (2008). The United Nations and the Responsibility to Protect. The Stanley Foundation Policy Analysis Brief, pp. 5. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, L. A. (1956). The Functions of Social Conflict. London Routledge and Kegar Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, F. M., Kimaro, S., Lyons, T., Rothchild, D., & Zartman, 1. W. (2010). Sovereignty as Responsibility; Conflict Management in Africa. Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingott Alkopher, T. (2016). From Kosovo to Syria: The Transformation of NATO Secretaries General’s Discourse on Military Humanitarian Intervention. European Security (London, England), 25(1), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2015.1082128

  • Dunne, T., & Schmidt, B. C. (2014). Realism. In S. Smith, P. Owens, & J. Baylis (Eds.), The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations (pp. 99–112). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbadawi, I., & Sambanis, N. (2000). Why Are There Many Civil Wars in Africa? Understanding and Preventing Violent Conflicts. Journal of African Economics, 9(3), 244–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. (2008). Russia, Georgia and the responsibility to protect. Amsterdam LF, 1, 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. (2011). Interview: The RtoP Balance Sheet After Libya in Thomas G. Weiss Ramesh Thakur, Mary Ellen O’Connell, Aidan Hehir, Alex J. Bellamy, David Chandler, Rodger Shanahan, Rachel Gerber, Abiodun Williams, and Gareth Evans, The Responsibility to Protect: Challenges & Opportunities In Light of the Libyan Intervention, November 2011. p. 40, http://www.c-ir.info/wp-content/uploads/KZP.pdf

  • Evans, G. (2015). The Evolution of the Responsibility to Protect: From Concept and Principle to Actionable Norm. In R. Thakur & W. Maley (Eds.), Theorising the Responsibility to Protect (pp. 16–37). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. (2020). The Dream and the Reality. Global Responsibility to Protect, 12(4), 363–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, E. E., & Martin, S. F. (2017). Border Security, Migration Governance & Sovereignty. Perry World House. Available at: https://global.upenn.edu/perryworldhouse/blog/border.security-migration-governance-sovereignty. Accessed: March 28, 2022.

  • Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (2001). Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 4(1), 391–416. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurey.polisci.4.1.391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florini, A. (1996). The Evolution of International Norms. International Studies Quarterly, 40(3), 363–389. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagro, S. F. (2014). The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) Doctrine. International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 61–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, A. M. (2012). A Clash of Responsibilities: Engaging with Realist Critiques of the R2P. Global Responsibility to Protect, 4(3), 334–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgis, M., & Lugosi, N. V. T. (2014). (Re)inserting Race and Indigeneity in International Relations Theory: A Post-colonial Approach. Global Change, Peace & Security, 26(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2014.867845

  • Graham-Harrison, E. (2022). ‘It’s Stomach-Turning’: The Children Caught up in Ukraine War. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/feb/27/children-caught-up-in-ukraine-war

  • Harper-Shipman, T. D., Hall, K. M. Q., Cutipa-Zom, G., & Dougé-Prosper, M. A. (2021). FORUM: Stripping Away the Body Prospects for Reimagining Race in IR. International Studies Review, 23(4), 2019–2047. https://doi.org/10.1093/ist/viab034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hehir, A. (2011). The Illusion of Progress Libya and the Future of R2P. Available at: https://www.e-ir.info/2011/09/11/the-illusion-of-progress-libya-and-the-future-of-r2p/. Accessed: March 9, 2020.

  • Hehir, A. (2013). The Permanence of Inconsistency: Libya, the Security Council, and the Responsibility to Protect. International Security, 38(1), 137–159. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24480572

  • Heinbecker, P. (2011, August 23). Plenty of Credit to Go Around in Gadhafi’s Fall. Montreal Gazette.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, E. A. (2017). The Revolution Will Not Be Theorised: Du Bois, Locke, and the Howard School’s Challenge to White Supremacist IR Theory. Millennium, 45(3), 492–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829817694246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, J. M. (2012). The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010. Cambridge Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, J. M., & Hobson, J. M. (2004). The Eastern Origins of Western Civilisation. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Human Development Report. (2014). Sustaining Human Progress: Reducing Vulnerabilities and Building Resilience.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Committee of the Red Cross. (2022). Russia—Ukraine International Armed Conflicts: ICRC Continue to Help People in Need.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, P. (1996). The Culture of National Security. Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York, Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. O. (1984). After Hegemony. Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalfaoui, A. (2021). Mass Atroticities: Definition and Relationship with Development. Peace, Justice and Strong Instructions (pp. 539–547). Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Klotz, A. (1995). Norms in International Relations: The Struggle Against Apartheid Ithaca. Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, W. (2011). The Development of the Responsibility to Protect from Evolving Norm to Practice. Global Responsibility to Protect, 3(1), 3–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, W. A. (2022). The interregnum: Governance in the new world disorder. International Journal, 77(3), 485–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kranner, S. D. (2001). Abiding Sovereignty. International Political Science Review, 22(3), 229–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, D. (1999). Sovereignty Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400823200

  • Krasner, S. D. (2009). Power, the state, and sovereignty: Essays on international relations. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legro, J. W. (2003). Which Norms Matter? Revisiting the “Failure” of Internationalism. International Organization, 51(1), 31–63. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081897550294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemkin, R. (1944). Axis Rule in Occupied Europe: Analysis, Proposals for Redress (pp. 79–95). Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. (2011). Soveriegnity and the Responsibility to Protect: Mutually Exclusive or Codependent? Griffith Law Review, 20(1), 153–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mastanduno, M., Lake, D. A., & Ikenberry, G. J. (1989). Toward a Realist Theory of State Action. International Studies Quarterly, 33(4), 457–474. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. WW Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, J. J. (2013). Structural Realism. In M. Kurki, S. Smith, & T. Dunne (Eds.), International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity (pp. 77–93). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R., & Baumeister, S. (2013). Managing Migration: Is Border Control Fundamental to Anti-trafficking and Anti-smuggling Interventions? Anti-Trafficking Review (2), 15. https://doi.org/10.14197/atr20121321

  • Mingst, K. A., & Arreguin-Toft, M. (2011). Essentials of International Relations (5th ed.). WW Norton & Company. Muscatine, Iowa: Stanley Foundation, September 2011. http://www.stanleyfoundation.org/resources.cfm?id

  • O’Connell, M. E. (2011). How to Lose a Revolution, e-International Relations. Available at: https://www.eir.info/2011/10/03/how-to-lose-a-revolution

  • Paris, R. (2014). The ‘Responsibility to Protect’ and the Structural Problems of Preventive Humanitarian Intervention. International Peacekeeping, 21, 569–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pupparo, C. (2015a). The Responsibility to Protect: Emerging Norm or Failed Doctrine? Global Tides, 9(1), 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pupparo, C. (2015). The Responsibility to Protect: Emerging Norm or Failed Doctrine? Global Tides, Vol. 9. Article 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purposes and Principles of the UN (Chapter I of UN Charter) | United Nations Security Council. (2023, November 23). Purposes and Principles of the UN (Chapter I of UN Charter) | United Nations Security Council. https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/content/purposes-and-principles-un-chapter-i-un-charter

  • Ramesh, T., & Maley, W. (2015). Theorising the Responsibility to Protect. International Affairs, 92(4), July 2016, 1000–1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12672

  • Reus-Smit, C. (1999). The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabaratnam, M. (2020). Is IR Theory White? Racialised Subject-Positioning in Three Canonical Texts. Millennium, 49(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829820971687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahnoun, M. (2009). Africa: Uphold Continent’s Contribution to Human Rights. Urges Top Diplomat, allAfrica.com, July 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikkink, K. (1998). Transnational politics, international relations theory, and human rights. PS: Political Science & Politics, 31(3), 517–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikkink, K. (2020). The Hidden Face of Rights: Towards a Politics of Responsibilities New Haven. Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. (2022). R2P at the UN: The Problem of Selective History and Incomplete Narratives. Global Responsibility to Protect, 1(aop), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahn, C. (2007). Responsibility to Protect Political Rhetoric or Emerging Legal Norm? The American Journal of International Law, 101(1), 99–120 http://www.jstor.org/stable/4149826

  • Stewart, R., & Knaus, G. (2012). Can Intervention Work? W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakur, R. C. (2011). The Responsibility to Protect: Norms, Laws and the Use of Force in International Politics. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tickner, J. A. (2016). Knowledge Is Power: Challenging IR’s Eurocentric Narrative. International Studies Review, 18(1), 157–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tourinho, M., Stuenkel, O., & Brockancier, S. (2016). Responsibility While Protecting”: Reforming R2P Implementation. Global Society: Journal of Interdisciplinary International Relations, 30(1), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2015.1094452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNHCR. (2022). What’s Happening in Libya? Available at: https://www.unhcr.ca/our-work/emergencies/libya/

  • United Nations. (2011). Security Council Authorizes All Necessary Measures to Protect Civilians in Libya. UN News Global Perspective Human Stories. Available at: https://news.un.org/en/story/2011/03/369382-security-council-authorizes-all-necessary-measures-protect-civilians-libya

  • United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. (2021). Humanitarian Needs Overview: Libya, OCHA. Available at: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjT2NWwiaP2AhX2IDOIHfApAveOFnoECAgQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Freliefweb.int%2Esites%2Freliefweb.in%2Ffiles%2Fresources%2Flibyahno20226dcc21.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3ySVPcz2B17HJALZDQvfmO

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Office on Genocide Prevention and the Responsibility to Protect. (2023, November 23). United Nations Office on Genocide Prevention and the Responsibility to Protect. https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/crimes-against-humanity.shtml

  • Verdeja, E. (2019). Critical Genocide Studies and Mass Atrocity Prevention. Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal, 13(3), 10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitalis, R. (2000). The Graceful and Generous Liberal Gesture: Making Racism Invisible in American International Relations. Millennium, 29(2), 331–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298000290020701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics Reading. Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. (1973). Political Action: The Problem of Dirty Hands. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 2(2), 160–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, T. G. (2014). Military Humanitarianism: Syria Hasn’t Killed It. The Washington Quarterly, 37(1), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2014.893171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, J. M. (2016). The Responsibility to Protect at Ten: Glass Half Empty or Half Full? The International Spectator, 51(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2016.116394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, J. (2012). What a Difference a Year Makes. Canadian International Council, created 5 February 2012. http://opencanada.org/features/syria-un/

  • Welsh, J. (2019). Norm Robustness and the Responsibility to Protect. Journal of Global Security Studies, 4(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogy045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics (Vol. 67). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria

    Enemaku Umar Idachaba

Authors
  1. Enemaku Umar Idachaba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enemaku Umar Idachaba .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Research & Studies, Nigerian Institute of International Affairs (NIIA), Lagos, Nigeria

    Nicholas Idris Erameh

  2. Department of Political Studies & International Relations, Northwest University, Mafikeng, South Africa

    Victor Ojakorotu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Idachaba, E.U. (2024). The Responsibility to Protect (RtoP): Norm Institutionalisation, Issues and Challenges. In: Erameh, N.I., Ojakorotu, V. (eds) Africa's Engagement with the Responsibility to Protect in the 21st Century. Africa's Global Engagement: Perspectives from Emerging Countries. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8163-2_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation