Skip to main content

Africa’s Engagement with the Responsibility to Protect in the Twenty-First Century

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Africa's Engagement with the Responsibility to Protect in the 21st Century

Abstract

The atrocities in Rwanda and Bosnia convinced the international community that a workable framework for the protection of civilians was necessary. In this framework, the World Summit Outcome Document from 2005 embraced the Responsibility to Protect (RtoP) doctrine. Since its implementation, the RtoP has sparked passionate debate among researchers, authorities, international leaders, and even academics. Despite this ongoing argument, the RtoP has been approved in a few armed conflicts and mass murders in Africa, each of which has sparked new controversy. The purpose of this study is to revisit and consider the new and contentious issues that have plagued the RtoP conversation since its initial litmus test in Libya in an effort to identify the issues that have impeded with its institutionalization, consolidation, and mobilization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adetula, V., Bereketeab, R., & Obi, C. (2021). Regional Economic Communities and Peacebuilding in Africa: Lessons from ECOWAS and IGAD (p. 256). Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annan, N. (2014). Violent Conflicts and Civil Strife in West Africa: Causes, Challenges and Prospects. Stability: International Journal of Security and Development, 3(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulden, J. (Ed.). (2013). Responding to Conflict in Africa: The United Nations and Regional Organizations. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branch, A. (2011). The Responsibility to Protect in Africa. In P. John (Ed.), Critical Perspective of the Responsibility to Protect: Interrogating Theory and Practice (pp. 103–125). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers, J., & Schunemann, J. (2013). The Future of Intrastate Conflict in Africa-More Violence or Greater Peace? Institute for Security Studies Papers, 2013(246), 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Coning, C., Gelot, L., & Karlsrud, J. (Eds.). (2016). The Future of African Peace Operations: From the Janjaweed to Boko Haram. Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erameh, N. I. (2017). Humanitarian Intervention, Syria and the Politics of Human Rights. International Journal of Human Rights, 21(5), 517–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erameh, N. I. (2018). Cosmopolitanism, Responsibility to Protect and the Libya Intervention: A Reassessment. Indian Quarterly, Journal, 74(4), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erameh, N. I. (2019). The Practice, Pitfalls, and Prospects of the Responsibility to Protect in Africa. Genocide Studies and Prevention, 13(2), 58–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erameh, N. I. (2021). African Regional Organizations, Conflict Resolution and Peacekeeping. In I. Alumona (Eds.), Regionalism, Security and Development in Africa. Routledge Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICISS. (2001). The Responsibility to Protect: Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. International Development Research Centre for ICISS. https://www.iciss.gc.ca

  • Kaldor, M. (2012). New and Old Wars: Organised Violence in a Global Era (3rd ed.). Polity Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, M. (2013). In Defence of New Wars. Stability: International Journal of Security and Development, 2(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuwali, D. (2022). Respecting the Law of Armed Conflict in Africa. The Palgrave Handbook of Sustainable Peace and Security in Africa (pp. 461–487). Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mamdani, M. (2010). Responsibility to Protect or Right to Punish? Journal of Intervention and State Building, 4(1), 53–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. (2015). The Responsibility to Protect and the Use of Force: Remaking the Procrustean Bed? Cooperation and Conflict, 51(2), 200–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ojakorotu, V., & Erameh, N. I. (2022). Tigray Conflict and the Crisis of Nation Building in Ethiopia: The Role of African Union. Journal of Nation Building and Policy Studies (JoNPS), 2022(Special Issue), 57–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orford, A. (2013). Moral Internationalism and the Responsibility to Protect. The European Journal of International Law, 24(1), 83–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, R. (2014). The ‘Responsibility to Protect’ and the Structural Problems of Preventive Humanitarian Intervention. International Peacekeeping, 21(5), 569–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wai, Z. (2014). The Empire’s New Clothes: African, Liberal Interventionism and the Contemporary World Order. Review of African Political Economy, 41(142), 483–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. D., & Boutellis, A. (2014). Partnership Peacekeeping: Challenges and Opportunities in the United Nations-African Union Relationship. African Affairs, 113(451), 254–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. D., D’Alessandro, M., Darkwa, L., Helal, A., Machakaire, J., & Rupesinghe, N. (2018). Assessing the Effectiveness of the African Union Mission in Somalia (AMISOM). EPON Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyss, M., & Tardy, T. (Eds.). (2014). Peacekeeping in Africa: The Evolving Security Architecture. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas Idris Erameh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Erameh, N.I., Ojakorotu, V. (2024). Africa’s Engagement with the Responsibility to Protect in the Twenty-First Century. In: Erameh, N.I., Ojakorotu, V. (eds) Africa's Engagement with the Responsibility to Protect in the 21st Century. Africa's Global Engagement: Perspectives from Emerging Countries. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8163-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics