Abstract
This article analyzes the promising exertion of artificial intelligence (AI) in international human rights law area, in particular, in the refugee status determination (RSD) procedures by the UNHCR and the migration services of states. The essential issues of possibility of applying AI in legal procedures by the party making decisions on granting refugee status, as well as by the asylum seeker himself, are considered. The scope for using AI as a means of optimizing decision-making, preventing typical mistakes, as well as an additional remedy to respect the interests of the applicant, is considered. Problematic issues have been raised that require additional discussion and amendments to the legislative acts of States and international treaties for the early introduction of the possibility of AI widespread application in the legal procedures under consideration, both in the interests of UNHCR and the States providing asylum, and in order to insure the virtual protection of asylum seekers’ rights.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
UN Office of the Secretary-General’s envoy on technology. https://www.un.org/techenvoy/content/artificial-intelligence. Accessed 05 May 2023
Council of Europe European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). https://www.coe.int/en/web/cepej/cepej-tools-on-cyberjustice-and-artificial-intelligence. Accessed 05 May 2023
UNESCO AI and the rule of law: capacity building for judicial systems. https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence/rule-law/mooc-judges. Accessed 05 May 2023
AI for good. https://aiforgood.itu.int/about-ai-for-good/un-ai-actions/. Accessed 05 May 2023
Council of Europe. European ethical charter on the use of artificial intelligence in judicial systems and their environment. https://rm.coe.int/ethical-charter-en-for-publication-4-december-2018/16808f699c. Accessed 05 May 2023
AI for good. https://aiforgood.itu.int/about-ai-for-good/un-ai-actions/unhcr/. Accessed 05 May 2023
AI for good. https://aiforgood.itu.int/about-ai-for-good/un-ai-actions/ohchr/. Accessed 05 May 2023
UNHCR global website. https://www.unhcr.org/media/28185. Accessed 05 May 2023
UNHCR Refworld. https://www.refworld.org.ru/rsdproceduralstandards.html. Accessed 05 May 2023
UNHCR Refworld. https://www.refworld.org/docid/5cb474b27.html. Accessed 05 May 2023
UNHCR Refworld. https://www.refworld.org/docid/42d66dd84.html. Accessed 05 May 2023
GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/asylum-decision-making-guidance-asylum-instructions. Accessed 05 May 2023
US Department of State. https://www.state.gov/refugee-admissions/. Accessed 05 May 2023
Garant legal information system. http://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/71725840/. Accessed 05 May 2023
UNHCR Refworld. https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/527246344.pdf. Accessed 05 May 2023
UNHCR Refworld. https://www.refworld.org.ru/pdfid/51fbaff14.pdf. Accessed 05 May 2023
UNHCR. The UN refugee agency. https://www.unhcr.org/media/unhcr-manual-refugee-protection-and-echr-part-4-selected-case-law-european-court-human-rights. Accessed 05 May 2023
Kilian DM (2015) Representation in court proceedings, 5 June 2015. https://www.ccbe.eu/document/PECO_Portal/Ukraine-June2015/Slides__Matthias_Kilian.pdf. Accessed 05 May 2023
Rajan PB (n.d.) Polygraph tests—benefits and challenges. https://academicus.edu.al/nr19/Academicus-MMXIX-19-146-155.pdf. Accessed 05 May 2023
LieDetectorTest.uk homepage. https://liedetectortest.uk/lie-detector-tests-for-asylum-seekers. Accessed 05 May 2023
BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-46830373. Accessed 05 May 2023
Carney J (2015) Subject refugees to lie detector tests. The Hill, 30 Dec 2015. https://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/264457-goper-subject-refugees-to-lie-detector-test/. Accessed 05 May 2023
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/artificial-intelligence-applications-criminal-courts-overview. Accessed 05 May 2023
Redden J, Banks D, Criminal Justice Testing and Evaluation Consortium (2020) Artificial intelligence applications for criminal courts. U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs. https://cjtec.org/files/5f5f943055f95. Accessed 05 May 2023
GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/search/all?keywords=artificial+intelligence&order=relevance. Accessed 05 May 2023
GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ethics-transparency-and-accountability-framework-for-automated-decision-making. Accessed 05 May 2023
New Scientist. https://www.newscientist.com/article/2351893-ai-legal-assistant-will-help-defendant-fight-a-speeding-case-in-court/. Accessed 05 May 2023
Digital skills & jobs platform. https://digital-skills-jobs.europa.eu/en/actions/national-initiatives/national-strategies/lithuania-state-digitisation-development-programme. Accessed 05 May 2023
Migration Policy Institute. Webinar: toward a road map for digitalization in the EU humanitarian protection space. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/events/digitalization-eu-humanitarian-protection. Accessed 05 May 2023
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kshevitskii, S.A. (2024). Prospects and Problems in the Application of AI in Refugee Status Determination Procedures. In: Nagar, A.K., Jat, D.S., Mishra, D., Joshi, A. (eds) Intelligent Sustainable Systems. WorldS4 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 803. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7569-3_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7569-3_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-7568-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-7569-3
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)